Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper
Claude Opus 4.6
Faster
Claude Opus 4.6
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | uncertain |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 WIN | N/A |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 WIN | N/A |
| Arena ELO | 1561 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports uncertain.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is open source.
Related Articles
Try Claude Opus 4.7 and read its benchmarks
Claude’s security test became a real breach
Claude’s 2026 limit changes are a capacity story, not a product story
Cognizant’s Claude play turns pilots into production
Prompt engineering is overrated for Claude Code
Claude Opus 5 posts the lowest safety audit score
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax H3Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 MaverickClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-CodexDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax H3DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs GPT-5.3-Codex