Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemma 4
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper
Claude Opus 4.6
Faster
Claude Opus 4.6
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemma 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 WIN | N/A |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 WIN | N/A |
| Arena ELO | 1549 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 4?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Gemma 4 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while Gemma 4 supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemma 4 open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. Gemma 4 is open source.
Related Articles
91 Anthropic GitHub repos showcase Claude Code push
Claude Design turns assets into a team design system
Claude vs GPT vs Gemini: Coding Benchmark Leaderboard
Claude Partner Program turns Anthropic into a channel
Anthropic pushes Claude deeper into enterprise data
Three multimodal models now work in Claude Code
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4oClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R1Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5Gemma 4 vs Llama 4 ScoutGemma 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Gemma 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.2Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.6Gemma 4 vs GPT-4oGemma 4 vs DeepSeek R1