Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3 235B

Qwen 3 235B leads in 4 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Qwen 3 235B

Cheaper

Qwen 3 235B

Faster

Qwen 3 235B

Detailed Comparison

Category	Gemma 4	Qwen 3 235B
Provider	Google	Alibaba
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	$0.86 WIN
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	$2 WIN
Arena ELO	N/A	1422 WIN
Coding	N/A	70.7% LiveCodeBench
Reasoning	N/A	2056 CodeForces ELO
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	~65 t/s WIN
Open Source	Yes	Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 or Qwen 3 235B?

Gemma 4 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.

Which has a larger context window?

Gemma 4 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.

Is Gemma 4 or Qwen 3 235B open source?

Gemma 4 is open source. Qwen 3 235B is open source.

Related Articles

DiffusionGemma’s transparency problem, measured

Gemma 4 brings 256K context to open models

Gemma 4 12B: Specs, Benchmarks & How to Run It Locally

QwenPaw Rebrands as a Personal AI Assistant

Gemma 4 assistant models get faster draft tokens

Kimi K2.6 and Qwen 3.6 Narrow the Gap

More Comparisons

Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemma 4 vs Llama 4 Scout Gemma 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemma 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.2 Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.6 Gemma 4 vs GPT-4o Gemma 4 vs DeepSeek R1 Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5 Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen 3 235B vs GLM-5.2 Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6 Qwen 3 235B vs GPT-4o Qwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek R1