[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-gpt-54":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":55,"winsA":68,"winsB":69,"relatedArticles":70,"otherComparisons":90},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$3\u002F$80","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"GPT-5.4","OpenAI","$3\u002F$15","Unifies Codex + GPT; 1M context; built-in computer use",[15,19,25,29,34,39,43,46,50],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":23,"winner":24},"context","Context Window","128K","1M","b",{"key":26,"label":27,"valueA":28,"valueB":28,"winner":18},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$3",{"key":30,"label":31,"valueA":32,"valueB":33,"winner":24},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$80","$15",{"key":35,"label":36,"valueA":37,"valueB":38,"winner":24},"arena","Arena ELO","N\u002FA","1560",{"key":40,"label":41,"valueA":37,"valueB":42,"winner":18},"coding","Coding","unknown",{"key":44,"label":45,"valueA":37,"valueB":42,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":47,"label":48,"valueA":37,"valueB":49,"winner":24},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)","~50 t\u002Fs",{"key":51,"label":52,"valueA":53,"valueB":54,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes","No",[56,59,62,65],{"question":57,"answer":58},"Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4?","GPT-5.4 is approximately 78% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.",{"question":60,"answer":61},"Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4?","GLM-5.2 scores N\u002FA on coding benchmarks, while GPT-5.4 scores unknown.",{"question":63,"answer":64},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while GPT-5.4 supports 1M.",{"question":66,"answer":67},"Is GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4 open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. GPT-5.4 is proprietary.",0,4,[71,75,78,81,84,87],{"slug":72,"title":73,"language":74},"glm-5-2-open-source-1m-context-long-tasks-en","GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务","en",{"slug":76,"title":77,"language":74},"glm-52-open-frontier-ai-for-developers-en","GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具",{"slug":79,"title":80,"language":74},"gpt-5-4-thinkng-pro-mini-nano-release-en","GPT-5.4 lands with Pro, Thinking, mini, nano",{"slug":82,"title":83,"language":74},"openai-gpt-54-cyber-security-access-en","OpenAI pushes GPT-5.4-Cyber into security work",{"slug":85,"title":86,"language":74},"openai-limits-gpt-54-cyber-trusted-firms-en","OpenAI Limits GPT-5.4-Cyber to Trusted Firms",{"slug":88,"title":89,"language":74},"openai-launches-gpt-54-cyber-defense-work-en","OpenAI launches GPT-5.4-Cyber for defense work",[91,96,101,106,111,116,121,126],{"slugA":92,"labelA":93,"slugB":94,"labelB":95},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-gpt-54","GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":97,"labelA":98,"slugB":99,"labelB":100},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","gpt-54-vs-llama-4-scout","GPT-5.4 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":102,"labelA":103,"slugB":104,"labelB":105},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-gpt-54","GPT-5.4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":107,"labelA":108,"slugB":109,"labelB":110},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-gpt-54","GPT-5.4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":112,"labelA":113,"slugB":114,"labelB":115},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","gpt-54-vs-qwen-36","GPT-5.4 vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":117,"labelA":118,"slugB":119,"labelB":120},"glm-52-vs-gpt-4o","GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o","gpt-4o-vs-gpt-54","GPT-5.4 vs GPT-4o",{"slugA":122,"labelA":123,"slugB":124,"labelB":125},"deepseek-r1-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1","deepseek-r1-vs-gpt-54","GPT-5.4 vs DeepSeek R1",{"slugA":127,"labelA":128,"slugB":129,"labelB":130},"claude-opus-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6","claude-opus-46-vs-gpt-54","GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.6"]