[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-grok-45":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":50,"winsA":57,"winsB":58,"relatedArticles":59,"otherComparisons":79},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$1.40\u002F$4.40","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"Grok 4.5","xAI","$0\u002F$0","Reportedly entered private beta with a much larger parameter count and new training data, but public API pricing is not yet confirmed.",[15,19,23,29,33,36,39,42,45],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":22,"winner":18},"context","Context Window","128K",{"key":24,"label":25,"valueA":26,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$1.4","N\u002FA","a",{"key":30,"label":31,"valueA":32,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$4.4",{"key":34,"label":35,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"arena","Arena ELO",{"key":37,"label":38,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"coding","Coding",{"key":40,"label":41,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":43,"label":44,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)",{"key":46,"label":47,"valueA":48,"valueB":49,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes","No",[51,54],{"question":52,"answer":53},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Grok 4.5 supports 128K.",{"question":55,"answer":56},"Is GLM-5.2 or Grok 4.5 open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. Grok 4.5 is proprietary.",2,0,[60,64,67,70,73,76],{"slug":61,"title":62,"language":63},"omlx-045-dev1-glm52-minimax-m3-speedups-en","oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3","en",{"slug":65,"title":66,"language":63},"grok-45-private-beta-tesla-spacex-en","Grok 4.5 enters private beta at Tesla and SpaceX",{"slug":68,"title":69,"language":63},"glm-5-2-tops-open-rankings-huawei-chips-en","GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips",{"slug":71,"title":72,"language":63},"glm-52-beats-gpt-55-coding-benchmarks-en","GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests",{"slug":74,"title":75,"language":63},"grok-imagine-1-5-turns-prompts-into-720p-video-en","Grok Imagine 1.5 turns prompts into 720p video",{"slug":77,"title":78,"language":63},"grok-ai-price-surge-liquidity-warning-en","Grok AI’s price surge is a liquidity warning, not a thesis",[80,85,90,95,100,105,110,115],{"slugA":81,"labelA":82,"slugB":83,"labelB":84},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-grok-45","Grok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":86,"labelA":87,"slugB":88,"labelB":89},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","grok-45-vs-llama-4-scout","Grok 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":91,"labelA":92,"slugB":93,"labelB":94},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-grok-45","Grok 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":96,"labelA":97,"slugB":98,"labelB":99},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-grok-45","Grok 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":101,"labelA":102,"slugB":103,"labelB":104},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","grok-45-vs-qwen-36","Grok 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":106,"labelA":107,"slugB":108,"labelB":109},"claude-fable-5-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5","claude-fable-5-vs-grok-45","Grok 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5",{"slugA":111,"labelA":112,"slugB":113,"labelB":114},"glm-52-vs-kimi-k27-code","GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code","grok-45-vs-kimi-k27-code","Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code",{"slugA":116,"labelA":117,"slugB":118,"labelB":119},"deepseek-v4-flash-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash","deepseek-v4-flash-vs-grok-45","Grok 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash"]