[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-kimi-k3":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":51,"winsA":61,"winsB":62,"relatedArticles":63,"otherComparisons":83},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$1.40\u002F$4.40","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"Kimi K3","Moonshot AI","$0.60\u002F$2.50","A newly released 2.8T-parameter open-source frontier model positioned as a top-tier competitor to leading U.S. systems.",[15,19,23,29,34,38,41,44,47],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":22,"winner":18},"context","Context Window","128K",{"key":24,"label":25,"valueA":26,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$1.4","$0.6","b",{"key":30,"label":31,"valueA":32,"valueB":33,"winner":28},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$4.4","$2.5",{"key":35,"label":36,"valueA":37,"valueB":37,"winner":18},"arena","Arena ELO","N\u002FA",{"key":39,"label":40,"valueA":37,"valueB":37,"winner":18},"coding","Coding",{"key":42,"label":43,"valueA":37,"valueB":37,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":45,"label":46,"valueA":37,"valueB":37,"winner":18},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)",{"key":48,"label":49,"valueA":50,"valueB":50,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes",[52,55,58],{"question":53,"answer":54},"Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Kimi K3?","Kimi K3 is approximately 47% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.",{"question":56,"answer":57},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Kimi K3 supports 128K.",{"question":59,"answer":60},"Is GLM-5.2 or Kimi K3 open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. Kimi K3 is open source.",0,2,[64,68,71,74,77,80],{"slug":65,"title":66,"language":67},"kimi-k3-benchmark-evaluation-guide-coding-agents-en","Kimi K3 Benchmark Evaluation Guide for Coding Agents","en",{"slug":69,"title":70,"language":67},"kimi-k3-intelligence-performance-price-analysis-en","Kimi K3 Proves Intelligence Still Costs Too Much",{"slug":72,"title":73,"language":67},"kimi-k3-pressure-middle-tier-ai-models-en","Kimi K3 could pressure the middle tier of AI models",{"slug":75,"title":76,"language":67},"kimi-k3-model-hype-into-harness-work-en","Kimi K3 turns model hype into harness work",{"slug":78,"title":79,"language":67},"kimi-api-quickstart-k27-code-highspeed-en","Kimi API quickstart adds K2.7 Code and Highspeed",{"slug":81,"title":82,"language":67},"kimi-k26-turns-prompt-into-brand-sites-en","Kimi K2.6 turns a prompt into brand sites",[84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119],{"slugA":85,"labelA":86,"slugB":87,"labelB":88},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-kimi-k3","Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":90,"labelA":91,"slugB":92,"labelB":93},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","kimi-k3-vs-llama-4-scout","Kimi K3 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":95,"labelA":96,"slugB":97,"labelB":98},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-kimi-k3","Kimi K3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":100,"labelA":101,"slugB":102,"labelB":103},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","kimi-k3-vs-qwen-36","Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":105,"labelA":106,"slugB":107,"labelB":108},"glm-52-vs-kimi-k27-code","GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code","kimi-k27-code-vs-kimi-k3","Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code",{"slugA":110,"labelA":111,"slugB":112,"labelB":113},"deepseek-v4-flash-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash","deepseek-v4-flash-vs-kimi-k3","Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash",{"slugA":115,"labelA":116,"slugB":117,"labelB":118},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-kimi-k3","Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":120,"labelA":121,"slugB":122,"labelB":123},"claude-fable-5-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5","claude-fable-5-vs-kimi-k3","Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5"]