[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-longcat-20":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":49,"winsA":56,"winsB":57,"relatedArticles":58,"otherComparisons":69},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$1.40\u002F$4.40","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"LongCat-2.0","Meituan","$0\u002F$0","Open-sourced in recent news as a new large model release, but reliable public API pricing was not available.",[15,19,23,29,33,36,39,42,45],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":22,"winner":18},"context","Context Window","128K",{"key":24,"label":25,"valueA":26,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$1.4","N\u002FA","a",{"key":30,"label":31,"valueA":32,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$4.4",{"key":34,"label":35,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"arena","Arena ELO",{"key":37,"label":38,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"coding","Coding",{"key":40,"label":41,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":43,"label":44,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)",{"key":46,"label":47,"valueA":48,"valueB":48,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes",[50,53],{"question":51,"answer":52},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while LongCat-2.0 supports 128K.",{"question":54,"answer":55},"Is GLM-5.2 or LongCat-2.0 open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. LongCat-2.0 is open source.",2,0,[59,63,66],{"slug":60,"title":61,"language":62},"omlx-045-dev1-glm52-minimax-m3-speedups-en","oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3","en",{"slug":64,"title":65,"language":62},"glm-5-2-tops-open-rankings-huawei-chips-en","GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips",{"slug":67,"title":68,"language":62},"glm-52-beats-gpt-55-coding-benchmarks-en","GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests",[70,75,80,85,90,95,100,105],{"slugA":71,"labelA":72,"slugB":73,"labelB":74},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":76,"labelA":77,"slugB":78,"labelB":79},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","llama-4-scout-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":81,"labelA":82,"slugB":83,"labelB":84},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":86,"labelA":87,"slugB":88,"labelB":89},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":91,"labelA":92,"slugB":93,"labelB":94},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","longcat-20-vs-qwen-36","LongCat-2.0 vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":96,"labelA":97,"slugB":98,"labelB":99},"claude-fable-5-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5","claude-fable-5-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs Claude Fable 5",{"slugA":101,"labelA":102,"slugB":103,"labelB":104},"glm-52-vs-kimi-k27-code","GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code","kimi-k27-code-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code",{"slugA":106,"labelA":107,"slugB":108,"labelB":109},"deepseek-v4-flash-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash","deepseek-v4-flash-vs-longcat-20","LongCat-2.0 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash"]