[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":49,"winsA":56,"winsB":57,"relatedArticles":58,"otherComparisons":72},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$1.40\u002F$4.40","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B","NVIDIA","$0\u002F$0","Open full-duplex speech-to-speech model with ~448 ms turn-taking latency and live tool calling.",[15,19,23,29,33,36,39,42,45],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":22,"winner":18},"context","Context Window","128K",{"key":24,"label":25,"valueA":26,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$1.4","N\u002FA","a",{"key":30,"label":31,"valueA":32,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$4.4",{"key":34,"label":35,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"arena","Arena ELO",{"key":37,"label":38,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"coding","Coding",{"key":40,"label":41,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":43,"label":44,"valueA":27,"valueB":27,"winner":18},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)",{"key":46,"label":47,"valueA":48,"valueB":48,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes",[50,53],{"question":51,"answer":52},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B supports 128K.",{"question":54,"answer":55},"Is GLM-5.2 or NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B is open source.",2,0,[59,63,66,69],{"slug":60,"title":61,"language":62},"kimi-k3-vs-glm-5-2-one-endpoint-test-en","Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2: a one-endpoint test","en",{"slug":64,"title":65,"language":62},"omlx-045-dev1-glm52-minimax-m3-speedups-en","oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3",{"slug":67,"title":68,"language":62},"glm-5-2-tops-open-rankings-huawei-chips-en","GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips",{"slug":70,"title":71,"language":62},"glm-52-beats-gpt-55-coding-benchmarks-en","GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests",[73,78,83,88,93,98,103,108],{"slugA":74,"labelA":75,"slugB":76,"labelB":77},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":79,"labelA":80,"slugB":81,"labelB":82},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","llama-4-scout-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":84,"labelA":85,"slugB":86,"labelB":87},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":89,"labelA":90,"slugB":91,"labelB":92},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b-vs-qwen-36","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":94,"labelA":95,"slugB":96,"labelB":97},"glm-52-vs-kimi-k27-code","GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code","kimi-k27-code-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs Kimi K2.7 Code",{"slugA":99,"labelA":100,"slugB":101,"labelB":102},"glm-52-vs-minimax-h3","GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax H3","minimax-h3-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs MiniMax H3",{"slugA":104,"labelA":105,"slugB":106,"labelB":107},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-maverick","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick","llama-4-maverick-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs Llama 4 Maverick",{"slugA":109,"labelA":110,"slugB":111,"labelB":112},"glm-52-vs-gpt-53-codex","GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.3-Codex","gpt-53-codex-vs-nemotronlabs-voicechat-11b","NemotronLabs VoiceChat 11B vs GPT-5.3-Codex"]