[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-amds-ai-stack-turns-silicon-into-platform-choice-en":3,"article-related-amds-ai-stack-turns-silicon-into-platform-choice-en":30,"series-industry-2448d7a5-4a62-40e8-82ad-ec831d6245d5":79},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"2448d7a5-4a62-40e8-82ad-ec831d6245d5","amds-ai-stack-turns-silicon-into-platform-choice-en","AMD’s AI stack turns silicon into platform choice","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">AMD’s \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fenterprise-ai\">enterprise AI\u003C\u002Fa> push turns hardware, software, and governance into a single platform choice.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I've been building around \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fai-infrastructure\">AI infrastructure\u003C\u002Fa> long enough to know when a vendor pitch is really just a chip pitch in a nicer jacket. Lately, that’s been the annoying part of enterprise AI: everyone wants to talk about the model, the demo, the agent, the slick UI. Then you get into production and suddenly it’s power, orchestration, CPU\u002FGPU balance, governance, and who gets blamed when the thing burns money at 3 a.m.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That’s why AMD’s current message caught my attention. It’s not just “we have faster silicon.” It’s AMD trying to stitch together EPYC, Instinct, ROCm, enterprise software, and partner platforms into something that looks more like an operating model than a product sheet. I’ve seen too many AI programs stall because the stack was assembled like a weekend IKEA project. The pieces were expensive. The instructions were vague. And nobody owned the whole thing.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The interesting part here is not the event hype. It’s the direction: open ecosystems, hybrid compute, governed deployment, and a lot less magical thinking about what it takes to run \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fagentic-ai\">agentic AI\u003C\u002Fa> in a real company.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>My anchor for this breakdown is SiliconANGLE’s July 7, 2026 piece, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fsiliconangle.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Famd-advancing-ai-enterprise-ai-infrastructure-amdadvancingai\u002F\">“AMD Advancing AI highlights enterprise AI infrastructure”\u003C\u002Fa>. It pulls together comments from AMD executives, Nutanix, Rackspace, and theCUBE Research, and it includes one number worth paying attention to: Paul Nashawaty says \u003Cstrong>64%\u003C\u002Fstrong> of organizations identify data and infrastructure bottlenecks, not model availability, as the biggest obstacle to AI deployment.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>AMD is not selling a GPU story anymore\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Enterprise artificial intelligence infrastructure has become as critical to AI success as the models themselves.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is simple: if I only buy the model narrative, I miss the part that decides whether anything ships. AMD is framing AI as a systems problem. That includes compute, software, orchestration, and the boring-but-expensive stuff like power envelopes and deployment fit.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783733597995-rcvk.png\" alt=\"AMD’s AI stack turns silicon into platform choice\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>I’ve run into this exact failure mode before. Teams buy into the model first, then discover the infrastructure can’t support the workload shape. \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Finference\">Inference\u003C\u002Fa> is one thing. Agentic workflows are another. When you add planning, tool calls, retries, state, and governance, the hardware conversation gets very real very fast.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>AMD’s move here is to stop acting like the only question is “which accelerator?” and start asking “what does the whole operating stack look like?” That’s a better question. It’s also harder to answer, which is probably why so many vendors avoid it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: when I evaluate an AI platform now, I don’t start with \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fbenchmark\">benchmark\u003C\u002Fa> screenshots. I start with a stack map.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>What runs on CPU?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>What runs on GPU?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>What is orchestrated serially?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>What is governed centrally?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>What is locked to one vendor?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If a vendor can’t answer those without hand-waving, I already know where the pain is going to show up.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Open beats closed when the workload keeps changing\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Through our partnership with Nutanix, we’re building a scalable, full-stack AI platform rooted in openness, designed to give enterprises and service providers the flexibility to innovate, extend and grow AI deployments across enterprises.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That quote from Dan McNamara is doing a lot of work, and honestly, it should. The core idea is that enterprise AI won’t stay static. Models change. Tooling changes. Compliance changes. Workloads change. If the stack is too closed, every change becomes a negotiation.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The AMD-Nutanix angle matters because Nutanix already has a reputation for abstracting infrastructure complexity in enterprise environments. Pairing that with AMD’s ROCm, EPYC, and Instinct story is basically a bet that customers want choice without having to assemble every layer themselves.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I like this direction because I’ve watched proprietary AI stacks create a different kind of lock-in. At first, the platform feels easy. Then you realize the “easy” part was just the onboarding. The real cost shows up later when you want to move workloads, swap models, or change the deployment topology.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: ask vendors whether their platform supports these three things without a rewrite.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Model portability\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Infrastructure portability\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Policy portability\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If the answer is “sort of” or “with our services team,” I’d treat that as a no.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Also, I’d look at the ecosystem, not just the logo. AMD links to \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.amd.com\u002Fen\u002Fproducts\u002Fsoftware\u002Frocm.html\">ROCm\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.amd.com\u002Fen\u002Fproducts\u002Fprocessors\u002Fepyc.html\">EPYC\u003C\u002Fa>, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.amd.com\u002Fen\u002Fproducts\u002Faccelerators\u002Finstinct.html\">Instinct\u003C\u002Fa>. That matters because enterprise buyers need a path, not a promise.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Agentic AI changes the CPU versus GPU argument\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“In the agentic flow, where you’re running multi-system agents, the first step you do when an agent request comes in [is] you need to start planning … that’s a combination of CPU and GPU.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>This is where the article gets more useful than the usual event recap. Suresh Andani is basically saying something I’ve seen in production too: agentic systems are not just giant parallel math machines. They have a control plane problem.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783733600717-2dqr.png\" alt=\"AMD’s AI stack turns silicon into platform choice\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>Planning, routing, tool execution, retries, orchestration, and state management are often serial or coordination-heavy. GPUs are great when you can keep them busy with parallel work. They are a terrible place to waste cycles on orchestration logic. If you do that, you pay premium compute prices for tasks that should have stayed on the CPU side.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve had teams proudly tell me they “moved everything to GPU” and then wonder why costs got ugly. That’s usually because they confused acceleration with architecture. AMD’s point here is that good AI infrastructure respects workload shape. It doesn’t just throw accelerators at every problem.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: split your agent stack into three buckets.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Planning\u002Fcontrol:\u003C\u002Fstrong> usually CPU-heavy\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Model execution:\u003C\u002Fstrong> often GPU-heavy\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Tooling\u002Forchestration:\u003C\u002Fstrong> depends, but rarely belongs entirely on GPU\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>Then map cost and latency to each bucket. If your architecture can’t explain where the expensive compute actually goes, you’re probably overpaying somewhere.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Governance is becoming part of the hardware conversation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Enterprises in regulated industries need AI infrastructure that is governed from the ground up, with one operator accountable for business outcomes, not a collection of vendors each owning a piece.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That came from Gajen Kandiah at Rackspace, and I think it’s one of the clearest lines in the whole piece. The old enterprise model was already messy enough. Now we’ve got AI stacks where one vendor handles the model, another handles inference, another handles storage, another handles security, and nobody wants the pager.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Governance used to be something teams bolted on after deployment. That doesn’t really work anymore. If an AI system is making decisions, summarizing regulated content, or triggering actions across business systems, governance has to be part of the architecture from day one.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Rackspace’s role in this story is interesting because it frames AMD as a silicon-layer partner inside a governed stack. That’s a different conversation than “we support AI workloads.” It says the operating model matters as much as the compute.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen regulated teams waste months trying to retrofit auditability into a stack that was never designed for it. It’s painful, and usually expensive. The better pattern is to define accountability before you define accelerator count.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: for any AI deployment, write down who owns these five things.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Model behavior\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Infrastructure uptime\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Data access policy\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Audit logging\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Business outcome\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If the same answer is “the vendor” for all five, I’d keep digging. That’s usually where responsibility disappears.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For the enterprise angle, Rackspace’s own AI positioning is worth reading too: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.rackspace.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fsolutions\u002Fai\">Rackspace AI solutions\u003C\u002Fa>. I’m not endorsing the stack, just pointing out that governance is now part of the buying conversation, not a later add-on.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Choice is the real product, not the chip\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“I think that the story is all about choice.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>John Hampton’s line is blunt, and I appreciate that. Enterprise buyers don’t actually wake up wanting another accelerator vendor. They want room to make tradeoffs without getting trapped. Choice means they can fit AI into existing power, existing procurement, existing security, and existing ops models.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That sounds boring until you’ve tried to deploy AI in a real company. Then boring becomes beautiful. Most organizations are not starting from scratch. They have data centers, cloud commitments, compliance rules, and teams that already know how to run certain systems. A good AI infrastructure strategy works with that reality instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>AMD’s pitch here is not “replace everything.” It’s “adapt the stack to the workload.” That’s a more mature message, and frankly, it’s one enterprise buyers should demand from everyone in this market.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve found the best vendor conversations are the ones where we talk about constraints first. Power. Latency. Budget. Skills. Data gravity. If a platform can’t fit those constraints, it doesn’t matter how pretty the demo is.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: run every AI platform through a constraint checklist.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Can it fit current power and cooling limits?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Can it work with existing identity and policy systems?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Can it support mixed CPU\u002FGPU workloads?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Can it run across on-prem and cloud environments?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Can we change vendors later without a full rewrite?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If the answer set is weak, the platform is not flexible. It’s just packaged differently.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Why this matters for agentic AI specifically\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“The event will feature conversations with AMD executives, customers, developers and partners focused on enterprise AI infrastructure, open ecosystems and AI deployment.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>Agentic AI is where a lot of infrastructure fantasies run into reality. A single chat demo can hide a lot of mess. A multi-step agent workflow cannot. Once agents start planning, calling tools, checking results, and escalating decisions, the stack needs better scheduling, better isolation, better observability, and better cost control.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That’s why AMD’s emphasis on full-stack infrastructure matters more here than it would for a simple model demo. Agentic systems are sensitive to the seams between layers. If the model runtime, orchestration layer, and policy layer don’t fit together cleanly, the whole thing gets brittle fast.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I think this is also why the open ecosystem message matters. Agentic AI is still changing too quickly for most teams to bet everything on one closed path. The ability to swap pieces, test alternatives, and keep governance intact is not a nice-to-have. It is the difference between a pilot and a platform.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: before you call something an “agent platform,” verify it can do these things in production.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Trace tool calls end to end\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Separate planning from execution\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Enforce policy at runtime\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Measure cost per task, not just cost per token\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>That last one matters more than people admit. Token cost is only one slice of the bill.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># Enterprise AI infrastructure decision memo\n\n## Goal\nBuild an open, governed AI platform that can support agentic workloads without forcing a full infrastructure rewrite.\n\n## What we are solving\n- Data and infrastructure bottlenecks\n- Excess GPU spend on serial orchestration tasks\n- Vendor lock-in from closed AI stacks\n- Weak governance and unclear accountability\n\n## Workload split\n### CPU-heavy tasks\n- Agent planning\n- Tool orchestration\n- Policy checks\n- Routing and control-plane logic\n\n### GPU-heavy tasks\n- Model inference\n- Batch embedding generation\n- Parallel scoring and generation\n- High-throughput acceleration workloads\n\n## Platform requirements\n- Open ecosystem support\n- Mixed CPU\u002FGPU deployment\n- Works with current power and cooling limits\n- Audit logging and policy enforcement\n- Model portability\n- Infrastructure portability\n- Clear ownership for business outcomes\n\n## Vendor evaluation questions\n1. Where does planning run?\n2. Where does orchestration run?\n3. Can we move models without rewriting the app?\n4. Can we swap infrastructure layers later?\n5. Who owns uptime, policy, and auditability?\n6. What is the cost per task, not just cost per token?\n7. Can this run inside our current operating model?\n\n## Decision rule\nIf the platform cannot explain CPU\u002FGPU workload split, governance, and portability in plain language, do not proceed.\n\n## Pilot scope\n- One business workflow\n- One agentic use case\n- One governance owner\n- One cost baseline\n- One rollback plan\n\n## Success metrics\n- Lower infrastructure bottlenecks\n- Lower wasted GPU time\n- Clear audit trail\n- Stable latency\n- No forced vendor lock-in\n\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>This template is mine, not AMD’s. I built it from the ideas in the SiliconANGLE piece and from the ugly reality of shipping AI in enterprises. Use it as a starting point, then make it fit your environment.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Original source: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fsiliconangle.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Famd-advancing-ai-enterprise-ai-infrastructure-amdadvancingai\u002F\">SiliconANGLE\u003C\u002Fa>. My breakdown is derivative of that reporting, but the checklist and memo template above are original and meant for practical reuse.\u003C\u002Fp>","A practical breakdown of AMD’s enterprise AI push, plus a copy-ready template for open, governed AI infrastructure planning.","siliconangle.com","https:\u002F\u002Fsiliconangle.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F07\u002Famd-advancing-ai-enterprise-ai-infrastructure-amdadvancingai\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783733597995-rcvk.png","industry","en","3423a7e8-a179-4463-b477-b3ba264b30b6",[17,18,19,20,21],"AMD","enterprise AI","agentic AI","ROCm","infrastructure",[23,24,25],"AMD is framing enterprise AI as a full-stack infrastructure problem, not just a silicon upgrade.","Open ecosystems and workload-aware CPU\u002FGPU splits matter more once agentic workflows hit production.","Governance and accountability are now core design requirements, not add-ons.",1,"2026-07-11T01:32:52.877953+00:00","2026-07-11T01:32:52.871+00:00","a1c158f8-b98b-4d99-aa84-35523d1f1876",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":38,"relatedPosts":42},[32,34,36],{"name":17,"slug":33},"amd",{"name":18,"slug":35},"enterprise-ai",{"name":19,"slug":37},"agentic-ai",{"id":15,"slug":39,"title":40,"language":41},"amds-ai-stack-turns-silicon-into-platform-choice-zh","AMD 讓 AI 堆疊變平台選擇","zh",[43,49,55,61,67,73],{"id":44,"slug":45,"title":46,"cover_image":47,"image_url":47,"created_at":48,"category":13},"ed1a612f-9be1-4de6-928c-c59a6d1c9960","claude-code-backdoor-scare-real-risks-en","Claude Code’s backdoor scare points to 4 real risks","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783771379288-oo7v.png","2026-07-11T12:02:32.598738+00:00",{"id":50,"slug":51,"title":52,"cover_image":53,"image_url":53,"created_at":54,"category":13},"4924361d-5a66-48d2-832a-46e3940d6186","ai-infrastructure-spending-durable-through-2027-en","AI infrastructure spending is still the trade to own through 2027","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783731759030-khfp.png","2026-07-11T01:02:20.89398+00:00",{"id":56,"slug":57,"title":58,"cover_image":59,"image_url":59,"created_at":60,"category":13},"8f92b8ee-963c-47cc-9427-9142b36cc166","ais-next-bottleneck-is-data-center-cooling-en","AI’s next bottleneck is data-center cooling","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783730002745-81zc.png","2026-07-11T00:33:01.0827+00:00",{"id":62,"slug":63,"title":64,"cover_image":65,"image_url":65,"created_at":66,"category":13},"b488a62f-d028-4ff5-8627-0f3cb79b5d89","six-layer-stablecoin-stack-turns-chaos-into-a-map-en","Six-layer stablecoin stack turns chaos into a map","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783708414239-rmjp.png","2026-07-10T18:33:06.978224+00:00",{"id":68,"slug":69,"title":70,"cover_image":71,"image_url":71,"created_at":72,"category":13},"1900612c-f077-464f-a119-fc5ed1e797da","openai-gov-partnerships-access-policy-en","OpenAI's gov partnerships turn access into policy","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783685002710-nclw.png","2026-07-10T12:02:54.103624+00:00",{"id":74,"slug":75,"title":76,"cover_image":77,"image_url":77,"created_at":78,"category":13},"bb07f0e8-3428-48f1-9cd0-b3a7aaa7320b","kubernetes-ai-assisted-maintainership-rules-en","Kubernetes sets rules for AI-assisted maintainership","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1783672388097-3f4c.png","2026-07-10T08:32:42.594785+00:00",[80,85,90,95,100,105,110,115,120,125],{"id":81,"slug":82,"title":83,"created_at":84},"d35a1bd9-e709-412e-a2df-392df1dc572a","ai-impact-2026-developments-market-en","AI's Impact in 2026: Key Developments and Market Shifts","2026-03-25T16:20:33.205823+00:00",{"id":86,"slug":87,"title":88,"created_at":89},"5ed27921-5fd6-492e-8c59-78393bf37710","trumps-ai-legislative-framework-en","Trump's AI Legislative Framework: What's Inside?","2026-03-25T16:22:20.005325+00:00",{"id":91,"slug":92,"title":93,"created_at":94},"e454a642-f03c-4794-b185-5f651aebbaca","nvidia-gtc-2026-key-highlights-innovations-en","NVIDIA GTC 2026: Key Highlights and Innovations","2026-03-25T16:22:47.882615+00:00",{"id":96,"slug":97,"title":98,"created_at":99},"0ebb5b16-774a-4922-945d-5f2ce1df5a6d","claude-usage-diversifies-learning-curves-en","Claude Usage Diversifies, Learning Curves Emerge","2026-03-25T16:25:50.770376+00:00",{"id":101,"slug":102,"title":103,"created_at":104},"69934e86-2fc5-4280-8223-7b917a48ace8","openclaw-ai-commoditization-concerns-en","OpenClaw's Rise Raises Concerns of AI Model Commoditization","2026-03-25T16:26:30.582047+00:00",{"id":106,"slug":107,"title":108,"created_at":109},"b4b2575b-2ac8-46b2-b90e-ab1d7c060797","google-gemini-ai-rollout-2026-en","Google's Gemini AI Rollout Extended to 2026","2026-03-25T16:28:14.808842+00:00",{"id":111,"slug":112,"title":113,"created_at":114},"6e18bc65-42ae-4ad0-b564-67d7f66b979e","meta-llama4-fabricated-results-scandal-en","Meta's Llama 4 Scandal: Fabricated AI Test Results Unveiled","2026-03-25T16:29:15.482836+00:00",{"id":116,"slug":117,"title":118,"created_at":119},"bf888e9d-08be-4f47-996c-7b24b5ab3500","accenture-mistral-ai-deployment-en","Accenture and Mistral AI Team Up for AI Deployment","2026-03-25T16:31:01.894655+00:00",{"id":121,"slug":122,"title":123,"created_at":124},"5382b536-fad2-49c6-ac85-9eb2bae49f35","mistral-ai-high-stakes-2026-en","Mistral AI: Facing High Stakes in 2026","2026-03-25T16:31:39.941974+00:00",{"id":126,"slug":127,"title":128,"created_at":129},"9da3d2d6-b669-4971-ba1d-17fdb3548ed5","cursors-meteoric-rise-pressures-en","Cursor's Meteoric Rise Faces Industry Pressures","2026-03-25T16:32:21.899217+00:00"]