[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-docker-monitoring-tools-real-budgets-en":3,"article-related-docker-monitoring-tools-real-budgets-en":40,"series-industry-3249ec56-0940-4cae-a21b-053e899ba56e":83},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":32,"views":36,"created_at":37,"published_at":38,"topic_cluster_id":39},"3249ec56-0940-4cae-a21b-053e899ba56e","docker-monitoring-tools-real-budgets-en","12 Docker monitoring tools that fit real budgets","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">This guide compares 12 \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fdocker\">Docker\u003C\u002Fa> monitoring tools by cost, depth, and operational effort.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Docker monitoring now ranges from free open source stacks to SaaS priced at $15 per host per month, so the right pick depends on how much data you need and how much ops work you can handle.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable>\u003Cthead>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Item\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Starting price\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Best for\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Fthead>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Prometheus + Grafana + cAdvisor\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Open source standard stack\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Datadog\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>$15\u002Fhost\u002Fmo\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Full-stack enterprise monitoring\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Portainer\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free CE \u002F $99\u002Fmo\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Docker management plus basic stats\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Dynatrace\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>$29\u002Fhost\u002Fmo\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>AI-assisted root cause analysis\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>New Relic\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free tier\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Usage-based pricing\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Netdata\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free \u002F $4.50\u002Fnode\u002Fmo\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Per-second metrics with little setup\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Dozzle\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Real-time log viewing\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Sysdig\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>~$20\u002Fhost\u002Fmo\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Monitoring plus security\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Elastic Observability\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free \u002F $99\u002Fmo\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Log-heavy environments\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>cAdvisor\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Lightweight metrics collection\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Zabbix\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Traditional infrastructure teams\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Uptime Kuma\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Free\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Container uptime checks\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Ch2>1. Prometheus + Grafana + cAdvisor\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The default open source stack for Docker monitoring is still \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fprometheus.io\u002F\">Prometheus\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgrafana.com\u002F\">Grafana\u003C\u002Fa>, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgoogle\u002Fcadvisor\">cAdvisor\u003C\u002Fa>. cAdvisor collects container metrics, Prometheus stores them, Grafana turns them into dashboards, and Alertmanager handles alerts.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782806590248-vm2p.png\" alt=\"12 Docker monitoring tools that fit real budgets\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>This stack is free in software terms, but it is not free in labor. You need servers to run it and enough engineering time to maintain upgrades, retention, and alert tuning. Toolradar notes that a production setup often needs 2 to 4 VMs and about 4 to 8 hours a month of maintenance.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best when you have DevOps capacity and want full control\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Strong fit for teams already using the LGTM stack\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Less ideal if you want a quick setup with little upkeep\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>2. Datadog\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.datadoghq.com\u002F\">Datadog\u003C\u002Fa> is the premium all-in-one choice for teams that want metrics, logs, traces, and security in one place. Its eBPF-based monitoring can see container behavior at kernel level, and its container visibility updates at 2-second granularity.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Pricing starts at $15 per host per month, with container limits that depend on tier. That can add up fast, but the platform can still make sense when you would otherwise stitch together several products. For 50 Docker hosts, Toolradar estimates roughly $750 to $1,350 a month before add-ons.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Good for large teams that want one vendor\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Useful when logs, APM, and security matter together\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Expensive if you only need basic container metrics\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>3. Portainer\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.portainer.io\u002F\">Portainer\u003C\u002Fa> is more of a Docker management GUI than a monitoring suite, but many teams use it as the first window into their containers. It \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fopd-distillation-skills-without-bruteforce-rl-en\">lets you\u003C\u002Fa> start, stop, and restart containers, view logs, and check basic CPU and memory stats from a clean dashboard.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782806586970-p7pg.png\" alt=\"12 Docker monitoring tools that fit real budgets\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>Its Community Edition is free and open source, while paid plans start at $99 per month. The important limit is scope: Portainer is great for hands-on administration, but it does not store long-term history or provide serious alerting. It works best beside a real monitoring system.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best for operators who need a web UI for Docker\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Helpful for RBAC and governance in shared environments\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Should be paired with Prometheus, Grafana, or Netdata\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>4. Dynatrace\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.dynatrace.com\u002F\">Dynatrace\u003C\u002Fa> is built for teams that want AI-driven diagnosis rather than raw dashboards. Its Davis AI can connect a CPU spike to the query or deploy that caused it, which is useful when container issues are symptoms of a wider service problem.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Toolradar lists Infrastructure Monitoring at $29 per host per month and Full-Stack at $58 per host for 8 GiB hosts. Dynatrace is one of the pricier options, but it can save time in complex microservice setups where manual root-cause work takes too long.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Strong for large, interconnected systems\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Useful when you want automatic service discovery\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Better for diagnosis than for hobbyist budgets\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>5. New Relic\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fnewrelic.com\u002F\">New Relic\u003C\u002Fa> uses a usage-based model instead of charging by host. That matters for teams with many containers on a small number of machines, because cost follows data ingestion rather than machine count.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Its free tier includes 100 GB per month of ingest, one Full Platform user, and unlimited Basic users. For startups or small teams, that is a generous entry point. The Docker integration auto-discovers containers and collects CPU, memory, network, and I\u002FO metrics through the Infrastructure \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fagent\">agent\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Good when you want a free starting point\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Can be cheaper than per-host tools in dense environments\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Best if you are comfortable managing ingest volume\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>6. Netdata\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.netdata.cloud\u002F\">Netdata\u003C\u002Fa> is the fastest path from install to useful metrics. One command gets you per-second visibility into containers, processes, and system resources, with automatic dashboards and anomaly detection built in.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That speed comes with a clear tradeoff: it is optimized for immediate insight, not deep historical analysis. Toolradar lists a free Community plan for up to 5 nodes, a $90 per year Homelab plan, and a Business tier at $4.50 per node per month. For small and mid-size teams, that is far cheaper than most SaaS rivals.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best for teams that want near-instant setup\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Great for catching short spikes that slower scrapes miss\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Useful when you want cloud aggregation without running Prometheus yourself\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>7. Dozzle\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fdozzle.dev\u002F\">Dozzle\u003C\u002Fa> focuses on one job: showing Docker logs in real time. It runs as a small container, connects to the Docker socket, and streams logs in a web UI that is easy to read and quick to deploy.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Dozzle is free and open source, and version 10.0 added webhook support, alert shortcuts, and a redesigned notifications page. It is not a full logging platform because it has no persistent storage or long-term search, but it is excellent when you need to see what a container is doing right now.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best for live log troubleshooting\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Very light to deploy and maintain\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Not a replacement for Loki or ELK\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>8. Sysdig\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fsysdig.com\u002F\">Sysdig\u003C\u002Fa> combines monitoring and security in one eBPF-based platform. It builds on open source projects like Sysdig CLI and Falco, then adds runtime threat detection, vulnerability scanning, and Prometheus-compatible metrics.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Toolradar lists Sysdig Monitor at about $20 per host per month and Secure at about $60 per host per month. If your container program needs both observability and runtime security, Sysdig can reduce tool sprawl. If security is not part of the brief, a simpler monitoring stack will cost less.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Strong for compliance and threat detection\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Useful when security teams need runtime visibility\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Overkill for pure metrics monitoring\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>9. Elastic Observability\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.elastic.co\u002Fobservability\">Elastic Observability\u003C\u002Fa> is the best fit when logs are the center of the problem. The Elasticsearch query engine is built for complex searches across large volumes of data, and the platform extends into APM, metrics, and synthetic checks.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Self-managed Basic is free, while Elastic Cloud starts at $99 per month. That makes it attractive for log-heavy environments where audit trails, incident forensics, or security events matter more than polished container dashboards. If your team already knows the ELK stack, the learning curve is smaller.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best for deep log analysis\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Good for audit and security workflows\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Less focused on simple container health views\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>10. cAdvisor\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgoogle\u002Fcadvisor\">cAdvisor\u003C\u002Fa> is the lightweight metrics collector that often sits under Prometheus. It auto-discovers Docker containers and exposes CPU, memory, network, and filesystem metrics through a Prometheus endpoint.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>It is free and open source, but it is not a complete monitoring product. There is no alerting, no long-term storage, and no real dashboarding beyond a basic web UI. Think of it as the data source, not the finished monitoring layer.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best as a collector inside a larger stack\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Very small and easy to run\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Already built into the Kubernetes kubelet\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>11. Zabbix\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zabbix.com\u002F\">Zabbix\u003C\u002Fa> is the classic monitoring workhorse for teams that already watch servers, networks, and applications in one system. Docker support comes through Zabbix Agent 2 and templates that auto-discover containers and feed them into Zabbix alerts and reports.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>It is free and open source, with revenue coming from support and training. For greenfield container monitoring, Prometheus and Grafana are usually a better fit. For organizations already standardized on Zabbix, though, adding Docker can be straightforward.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best for legacy IT shops with existing Zabbix use\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Convenient if you want one alerting system\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Less native to container workflows than newer tools\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>12. Uptime Kuma\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flouislam\u002Fuptime-kuma\">Uptime Kuma\u003C\u002Fa> checks whether containers are up, not how well they are performing. It watches container status through the Docker socket and sends alerts through Slack, Discord, Telegram, email, and many other services.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That narrow focus is the point. If you need a friendly uptime checker with public or private status pages, it is hard to beat. If you need CPU, memory, and trend analysis, you will need a separate monitoring stack.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Best for uptime alerts and status pages\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Very easy to understand and deploy\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Not a performance monitoring tool\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>How to decide\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>If you want the lowest-ops path to useful metrics, Netdata is the easiest start. If you want full control and no license cost, Prometheus plus Grafana plus cAdvisor is the standard. If you need one platform for logs, traces, security, and containers, Datadog, Dynatrace, or Sysdig make more sense.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For narrow jobs, pick the specialist: Dozzle for live logs, Uptime Kuma for uptime checks, Portainer for container management, and Elastic for log search. The right Docker monitoring tool is the one that matches your team’s budget, staffing, and tolerance for maintenance.\u003C\u002Fp>","12 Docker monitoring tools, from free open source stacks to enterprise SaaS, matched to budgets, scale, and security needs.","toolradar.com","https:\u002F\u002Ftoolradar.com\u002Fblog\u002Fdocker-container-monitoring-tools",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782806590248-vm2p.png","industry","en","3ccd4bc9-8220-44ca-8792-8cacd6b3c714",[17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31],"Docker monitoring","container monitoring","Prometheus","Grafana","Datadog","Portainer","Dynatrace","New Relic","Netdata","Dozzle","Sysdig","Elastic Observability","cAdvisor","Zabbix","Uptime Kuma",[33,34,35],"Prometheus, Grafana, and cAdvisor are the default open source Docker stack.","Datadog, Dynatrace, and Sysdig suit teams that want broader observability or security.","Netdata, Dozzle, Portainer, and Uptime Kuma are best when you need a focused, low-friction tool.",0,"2026-06-30T08:02:42.276141+00:00","2026-06-30T08:02:42.264+00:00","3f379a7e-5604-48c5-9d11-ae773458ce1a",{"tags":41,"relatedLang":42,"relatedPosts":46},[],{"id":15,"slug":43,"title":44,"language":45},"docker-monitoring-tools-real-budgets-zh","12 款 Docker 監控工具，按預算挑最省","zh",[47,53,59,65,71,77],{"id":48,"slug":49,"title":50,"cover_image":51,"image_url":51,"created_at":52,"category":13},"952734bd-be94-4603-8606-810ff75c4be2","rwa-tokenization-new-default-ownership-2026-en","RWA tokenization is becoming the new default for ownership","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782819166578-u7f2.png","2026-06-30T11:32:22.166351+00:00",{"id":54,"slug":55,"title":56,"cover_image":57,"image_url":57,"created_at":58,"category":13},"3f89e362-9464-415b-8522-202e8189e004","e-estate-leads-2026-real-estate-tokenization-en","E-Estate leads 2026 real estate tokenization","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782818270114-lhqn.png","2026-06-30T11:17:26.585416+00:00",{"id":60,"slug":61,"title":62,"cover_image":63,"image_url":63,"created_at":64,"category":13},"fef2f5ea-52e6-4c17-a94a-0dc993387fe0","base-sequencer-outage-single-sequencer-fragile-en","Base's sequencer outage proves single-sequencer design is too fragile","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782804765811-mseo.png","2026-06-30T07:32:20.844193+00:00",{"id":66,"slug":67,"title":68,"cover_image":69,"image_url":69,"created_at":70,"category":13},"a3c39608-b95a-4f2a-bb94-ffd552a45080","google-ai-talent-outflow-anthropic-week-en","Google AI 人才外流，Anthropic 赢得一周","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782803871739-wh2b.png","2026-06-30T07:17:23.793427+00:00",{"id":72,"slug":73,"title":74,"cover_image":75,"image_url":75,"created_at":76,"category":13},"96546546-c8c3-4687-863a-91af4f974e94","cloudflare-ai-code-review-ci-orchestration-en","Cloudflare把AI代码审查做成了CI编排系统","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782795770938-ts94.png","2026-06-30T05:02:23.865963+00:00",{"id":78,"slug":79,"title":80,"cover_image":81,"image_url":81,"created_at":82,"category":13},"047bf180-ba3f-452f-97b3-3c1b4cf14bd4","stablecoin-payments-faster-but-fees-lag-en","Stablecoin Payments Are Faster, But Fees Lag","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782792167457-mamh.png","2026-06-30T04:02:26.182566+00:00",[84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119,124,129],{"id":85,"slug":86,"title":87,"created_at":88},"d35a1bd9-e709-412e-a2df-392df1dc572a","ai-impact-2026-developments-market-en","AI's Impact in 2026: Key Developments and Market Shifts","2026-03-25T16:20:33.205823+00:00",{"id":90,"slug":91,"title":92,"created_at":93},"5ed27921-5fd6-492e-8c59-78393bf37710","trumps-ai-legislative-framework-en","Trump's AI Legislative Framework: What's Inside?","2026-03-25T16:22:20.005325+00:00",{"id":95,"slug":96,"title":97,"created_at":98},"e454a642-f03c-4794-b185-5f651aebbaca","nvidia-gtc-2026-key-highlights-innovations-en","NVIDIA GTC 2026: Key Highlights and Innovations","2026-03-25T16:22:47.882615+00:00",{"id":100,"slug":101,"title":102,"created_at":103},"0ebb5b16-774a-4922-945d-5f2ce1df5a6d","claude-usage-diversifies-learning-curves-en","Claude Usage Diversifies, Learning Curves Emerge","2026-03-25T16:25:50.770376+00:00",{"id":105,"slug":106,"title":107,"created_at":108},"69934e86-2fc5-4280-8223-7b917a48ace8","openclaw-ai-commoditization-concerns-en","OpenClaw's Rise Raises Concerns of AI Model Commoditization","2026-03-25T16:26:30.582047+00:00",{"id":110,"slug":111,"title":112,"created_at":113},"b4b2575b-2ac8-46b2-b90e-ab1d7c060797","google-gemini-ai-rollout-2026-en","Google's Gemini AI Rollout Extended to 2026","2026-03-25T16:28:14.808842+00:00",{"id":115,"slug":116,"title":117,"created_at":118},"6e18bc65-42ae-4ad0-b564-67d7f66b979e","meta-llama4-fabricated-results-scandal-en","Meta's Llama 4 Scandal: Fabricated AI Test Results Unveiled","2026-03-25T16:29:15.482836+00:00",{"id":120,"slug":121,"title":122,"created_at":123},"bf888e9d-08be-4f47-996c-7b24b5ab3500","accenture-mistral-ai-deployment-en","Accenture and Mistral AI Team Up for AI Deployment","2026-03-25T16:31:01.894655+00:00",{"id":125,"slug":126,"title":127,"created_at":128},"5382b536-fad2-49c6-ac85-9eb2bae49f35","mistral-ai-high-stakes-2026-en","Mistral AI: Facing High Stakes in 2026","2026-03-25T16:31:39.941974+00:00",{"id":130,"slug":131,"title":132,"created_at":133},"9da3d2d6-b669-4971-ba1d-17fdb3548ed5","cursors-meteoric-rise-pressures-en","Cursor's Meteoric Rise Faces Industry Pressures","2026-03-25T16:32:21.899217+00:00"]