[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-hbar-10-cent-zone-maps-next-breakout-en":3,"article-related-hbar-10-cent-zone-maps-next-breakout-en":30,"series-industry-05c9a725-ef5c-4df3-9416-0d96068b72c0":73},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"05c9a725-ef5c-4df3-9416-0d96068b72c0","hbar-10-cent-zone-maps-next-breakout-en","HBAR’s $0.10 zone maps the next breakout","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">HBAR is pressing into a $0.10 demand zone that could decide the next move.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve been staring at crypto charts long enough to know when a setup starts feeling too tidy. HBAR is one of those. On paper, it looks clean: a multi-year support line, a falling wedge, RSI sitting near the kind of levels traders love to call “oversold,” and a demand band around $0.10 to $0.13 that everybody wants to treat like a floor. But the market never cares about how neat your annotations are. It cares about whether buyers actually show up.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That’s the part that bugs me here. A lot of chart writeups stop at “breakout potential” and leave out the annoying part: if the level fails, the same structure that looks bullish can turn into a trap fast. I’ve watched too many altcoins bounce just enough to make people feel smart, then roll over and take out the obvious support anyway. So when I read this HBAR setup, I’m not asking “can it moon?” I’m asking which line matters, which move invalidates the idea, and what I’d do if price just keeps chopping inside the wedge.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This is the kind of setup where patience matters more than optimism. If you’re trading it, you need levels, not vibes.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The source that kicked this off is a TronWeekly market analysis by Sajjal Ali, published June 24, 2026, and it leans on chart commentary from \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Ftoken\">Token\u003C\u002Fa> Talk and MCO Global. I’m using the article at \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tronweekly.com\u002Fhbar-price-setup-signals-explosive-breakout\u002F\">TronWeekly\u003C\u002Fa> as the starting point, then I’m stripping the chart talk down into something you can actually use. The original piece does not give a clean view count, bookmark count, or anything like that, so I’m not inventing one.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Stop calling it a breakout until support survives\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“The weekly chart shows price moving into a rising trendline that has been respected since 2020.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is simple: the bullish case depends on a line that has already mattered for years. If HBAR keeps respecting that rising trendline, the broader structure stays alive. If it loses it, all the wedge talk starts looking a lot less impressive.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782626596841-xo5q.png\" alt=\"HBAR’s $0.10 zone maps the next breakout\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>I’ve seen traders get hypnotized by the word “breakout” and forget that breakouts need context. A falling wedge can be bullish, sure, but only if price actually stops making lower highs and starts reclaiming lost ground. Until then, it’s just a compressed downtrend with a nicer name.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The article says the weekly chart has been respecting a rising trendline since 2020, and that matters because long-term market participants tend to defend zones they’ve already defended before. That’s not magic. It’s just memory. People remember where price bounced, where they averaged in, and where they got trapped. Those memories become orders.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: I’d treat the trendline as the first real filter, not the final target. If you’re trading HBAR, you want to know whether price is holding above the long-term support band or merely touching it before another leg down. A valid setup needs confirmation, not hope. That means watching weekly closes, not just intraday spikes.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>There’s also a practical lesson here for anyone drawing support lines by hand. Don’t make the line fit your bias. Use the line that the market has repeatedly respected. If a chart only looks bullish when you force the angle, that’s usually your cue to back off.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Watch the weekly trendline first.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Ignore intraday noise if the higher timeframe is still intact.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Wait for price to reclaim structure before calling it a trend change.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The $0.10 to $0.13 zone is the real battleground\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“There are various technical indicators that match in this range. These include the breakout retest range, support zone from history, and the bottom of the long-term trend.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that $0.10 to $0.13 is not just “a support area.” It’s a cluster of reasons for buyers to care. Historical support, retest behavior, and the lower edge of the larger trend are all pointing to the same neighborhood. When multiple signals line up like that, the zone becomes more important than any single indicator.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This is the part I’d pay attention to if I were actually managing a position. A lot of traders obsess over one level, then get blindsided because they never asked what happens inside the zone. A demand area is not a single price. It’s a range where buyers may step in, fail, or simply absorb supply before getting run over again.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The article also ties this band to prior accumulation in 2022 and 2023, which is exactly the kind of context that matters. If price spent a long time building a base there before, then participants who bought that area may be back in the market defending it. Or they may be waiting to escape breakeven. Either way, that range is loaded.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: I’d map the zone as a decision area, not as a guaranteed floor. If HBAR tags $0.13 and shows strength, that’s one thing. If it bleeds through $0.10 and can’t recover, then the “demand zone” is just a place where sellers were willing to keep pressing. That distinction matters more than people admit.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>When I trade setups like this, I prefer to mark three things: the top of the zone, the middle, and the failure point below it. That keeps me from pretending the whole band is one clean line. Markets don’t move in clean lines. They move in messy negotiations.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Top of zone: where a bounce should start showing.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Middle of zone: where chop is normal.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Failure point: where the setup stops being bullish.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>RSI in the mid-30s is not a buy signal by itself\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“The RSI had fallen into the mid-30s region, a level where there has been a history of signals for a possible recovery in the past.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that momentum is weak enough to make a rebound plausible, but not weak enough to guarantee one. RSI in the mid-30s can support a reversal thesis, yet it can also stay depressed while price keeps drifting lower. I’ve been burned by that more than once.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782626593867-18s1.png\" alt=\"HBAR’s $0.10 zone maps the next breakout\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>People love to treat RSI like a vending machine. Push it into a certain level, get a bounce. That’s not how it works. RSI helps you understand whether momentum is stretched, not whether buyers have committed to a new trend.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The TronWeekly piece says HBAR has historically shown recovery signals around similar RSI levels. Fine. That’s useful, but only as a backdrop. If price is still making lower highs under a downtrend line, the oscillator alone won’t rescue the chart. It just tells you the move may be maturing.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into this exact problem on other altcoin charts where RSI looked “washed out” for days. The bounce came later than people expected, and the first bounce failed because the market still hadn’t reclaimed structure. The indicator was right about exhaustion, but wrong about timing. That’s the annoying part.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: use RSI as a timing aid, not a trigger. If HBAR is sitting in the demand zone and RSI starts curling up, that’s more interesting than RSI sitting low by itself. If price is still losing the zone, then low RSI just means the market is tired while it continues to fall. Tired markets can still fall.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>If you want a cleaner read, pair RSI with price acceptance. Did the market hold the zone? Did it reclaim a key intraday or weekly level? If not, I’d stop pretending the oscillator is enough.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The upside targets only matter after the first reclaim\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Assuming that the buyers will defend the current level, then HBAR may attempt a recovery back to the range of $0.18-$0.20 initially.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the first upside target is not the moonshot. It’s the proof-of-life move. If HBAR can’t get back into the $0.18 to $0.20 area, then the market has not really confirmed anything.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I like this framing because it keeps the trade honest. Too many posts jump straight from support to some huge target and skip the part where the market has to earn the next leg. First reclaim. Then acceptance. Then continuation. Without that sequence, you’re just narrating a wish.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The article later points to $0.25 to $0.30 as the next resistance band if price sustains above the initial recovery range. That makes sense structurally. Prior resistance often becomes the place where rallies stall, especially when the asset has spent a long time repairing damage from a bigger drawdown.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you’re planning around this setup, separate the trade into checkpoints. First, does HBAR defend the demand zone? Second, can it reclaim $0.18 to $0.20? Third, can it hold above that area without immediately getting rejected? Only after those steps do I care about the higher band.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’d also remind myself that a successful bounce can still be a bad trade if you entered too early and risked too much. The market can be directionally right and still punish sloppy positioning. That’s why I care about levels more than narratives.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Checkpoint 1: defend the demand zone.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Checkpoint 2: reclaim $0.18 to $0.20.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Checkpoint 3: hold above reclaim without fast rejection.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The bearish path is still very much alive\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Failure to break through the region and decline below $0.072-$0.073 could be a sign that the downtrend is entering wave (3).”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the downside case is not some remote disaster scenario. It’s the alternate path sitting right next to the bullish one. If HBAR can’t clear resistance and instead loses the lower support band around $0.072 to $0.073, the chart can get a lot uglier fast.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This is where the MCO Global view matters. They’re framing the short-term move as a bearish Elliott Wave structure, with sellers still in control under a long-term downtrend line. I don’t care whether every trader uses Elliott Wave the same way. I do care that the short-term structure is still being read as corrective until proven otherwise.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That lower band is important because it’s the line between a messy consolidation and a more aggressive continuation lower. The TronWeekly article says a failure there could open a move toward $0.05 to $0.045. That’s not a casual dip. That’s a deeper repricing.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: don’t build a bullish position as if the bearish path doesn’t exist. If the market loses the lower support, the trade thesis changes. I’d want to see whether price can recover above $0.102 to $0.11 to invalidate the current decline. If it can’t, the downtrend stays in charge.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>In other words, this isn’t a setup where you marry the bull case and ignore the rest. It’s a range where both sides are still active. The market hasn’t picked a winner yet.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Here’s the part most traders skip: invalidation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“The bearish outlook is still relevant unless the HBAR price goes up above $0.102-$0.11.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the chart has a clear line where the short-term bearish read starts to weaken. That’s the number I’d keep in front of me, because any good setup needs a point where the story stops making sense.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve learned the hard way that without invalidation, every chart looks tradable. That’s a problem. You need a place where you admit the idea was wrong. Otherwise you end up averaging into a thesis instead of trading a setup.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The article gives us that line: above $0.102 to $0.11, the current decline is undermined. Below it, sellers keep the upper hand. That’s useful because it turns a vague market opinion into something actionable. You can plan around it. You can size around it. You can stop pretending every bounce is meaningful.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: decide before entry what confirms the move and what kills it. If price reclaims the invalidation zone, the bearish thesis weakens. If it fails there and rolls back over, the trend remains intact. This is basic, but people still skip it because they want to be early.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’d rather be late and right than early and trapped. Especially in crypto, where “early” often means “stuck watching a 20% move against you.”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># HBAR trade map template\n\n## Bias\n- Base case: HBAR is testing the $0.10–$0.13 demand zone.\n- Bullish only if price holds the zone and reclaims structure.\n- Bearish if price loses lower support and keeps rejecting resistance.\n\n## Key levels\n- Demand zone: $0.10–$0.13\n- Near-term reclaim: $0.102–$0.11\n- First upside target: $0.18–$0.20\n- Secondary resistance: $0.25–$0.30\n- Breakdown trigger: $0.072–$0.073\n- Lower downside target: $0.05–$0.045\n\n## What I want to see\n1. Weekly support holds above the long-term trendline.\n2. RSI stabilizes and starts curling up from the mid-30s.\n3. Price reclaims $0.102–$0.11 with follow-through.\n4. Price accepts above $0.18–$0.20 before I treat the bounce as real.\n\n## What invalidates the bullish case\n- Clean break below $0.072–$0.073.\n- Failure to reclaim $0.102–$0.11 after a bounce.\n- Rejection from the demand zone with expanding downside volume.\n\n## How I’d phrase the setup\nHBAR is sitting in a long-term demand zone, but I’m only interested in the long side if price holds support and reclaims the short-term invalidation band. Until then, it’s just a chart under pressure.\n\n## Trading note\n- Don’t confuse a bounce with a trend change.\n- Don’t size the position as if the support cannot fail.\n- Treat every reclaim as a checkpoint, not a victory lap.\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>The template above is my version of the setup, not the original article’s wording. I’ve translated the chart commentary into a checklist you can reuse on your own chart review. That’s the whole point: less chart poetry, more decision-making.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Source attribution: the original reporting and technical framing came from \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tronweekly.com\u002Fhbar-price-setup-signals-explosive-breakout\u002F\">TronWeekly\u003C\u002Fa>. I’ve added my own breakdown, commentary, and trading workflow around it. The chart levels and scenario descriptions are derivative of that source, while the template and application notes are mine.\u003C\u002Fp>","A plain-English breakdown of HBAR’s $0.10 demand zone, wedge setup, and the levels I’d watch before calling a breakout.","www.tronweekly.com","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tronweekly.com\u002Fhbar-price-setup-signals-explosive-breakout\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782626596841-xo5q.png","industry","en","c85ab624-2ae3-481c-9737-a822fe278d1a",[17,18,19,20,21],"HBAR","price analysis","technical analysis","falling wedge","support zone",[23,24,25],"HBAR’s bullish case depends on defending the $0.10–$0.13 demand zone.","The first real confirmation is a reclaim of $0.102–$0.11, not just a bounce.","If $0.072–$0.073 fails, the chart can open a much deeper downside path.",0,"2026-06-28T06:02:53.041312+00:00","2026-06-28T06:02:53.023+00:00","50ad070c-8891-4ccc-a7ee-038aa8918c86",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":32,"relatedPosts":36},[],{"id":15,"slug":33,"title":34,"language":35},"hbar-10-cent-zone-maps-next-breakout-zh","HBAR 讓你先看支撐再談突破","zh",[37,43,49,55,61,67],{"id":38,"slug":39,"title":40,"cover_image":41,"image_url":41,"created_at":42,"category":13},"1334df83-1b4b-4c5f-9707-e020fe64f521","openclaw-openai-realtime-paid-api-not-subscription-perk-en","OpenClaw should treat OpenAI Realtime as a paid API, not a subscripti…","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782674272037-c6qm.png","2026-06-28T19:17:24.994296+00:00",{"id":44,"slug":45,"title":46,"cover_image":47,"image_url":47,"created_at":48,"category":13},"04cdbad0-ca9e-4794-b2fd-79125566e019","krea-2-two-second-image-generation-teams-en","Krea 2 brings 2-second image generation to teams","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782673372571-q3g0.png","2026-06-28T19:02:22.91619+00:00",{"id":50,"slug":51,"title":52,"cover_image":53,"image_url":53,"created_at":54,"category":13},"6622fa0c-3619-4bc2-adf1-7e3813fd5174","us-model-curbs-security-deals-not-bans-en","US model curbs should be lifted through security deals, not blanket b…","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782658965406-pysv.png","2026-06-28T15:02:20.414547+00:00",{"id":56,"slug":57,"title":58,"cover_image":59,"image_url":59,"created_at":60,"category":13},"042e3873-18ef-472c-9e34-e5e0e3995e1e","metas-moderation-shift-shows-where-ai-cuts-costs-en","Meta’s moderation shift shows where AI cuts costs","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782654472664-zyid.png","2026-06-28T13:47:23.092521+00:00",{"id":62,"slug":63,"title":64,"cover_image":65,"image_url":65,"created_at":66,"category":13},"ed5f0914-640e-4fe1-af0c-ead6acc6403a","meta-replacing-moderators-with-ai-to-cut-costs-en","Meta is replacing moderators with AI to cut costs","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782653573805-ro1p.png","2026-06-28T13:32:30.212298+00:00",{"id":68,"slug":69,"title":70,"cover_image":71,"image_url":71,"created_at":72,"category":13},"679d7344-8847-4cae-8b8f-01f6a065aba6","metas-ai-moderation-push-is-the-wrong-tradeoff-en","Meta’s AI moderation push is the wrong tradeoff","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782652668263-q22a.png","2026-06-28T13:17:22.301423+00:00",[74,79,84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119],{"id":75,"slug":76,"title":77,"created_at":78},"d35a1bd9-e709-412e-a2df-392df1dc572a","ai-impact-2026-developments-market-en","AI's Impact in 2026: Key Developments and Market Shifts","2026-03-25T16:20:33.205823+00:00",{"id":80,"slug":81,"title":82,"created_at":83},"5ed27921-5fd6-492e-8c59-78393bf37710","trumps-ai-legislative-framework-en","Trump's AI Legislative Framework: What's Inside?","2026-03-25T16:22:20.005325+00:00",{"id":85,"slug":86,"title":87,"created_at":88},"e454a642-f03c-4794-b185-5f651aebbaca","nvidia-gtc-2026-key-highlights-innovations-en","NVIDIA GTC 2026: Key Highlights and Innovations","2026-03-25T16:22:47.882615+00:00",{"id":90,"slug":91,"title":92,"created_at":93},"0ebb5b16-774a-4922-945d-5f2ce1df5a6d","claude-usage-diversifies-learning-curves-en","Claude Usage Diversifies, Learning Curves Emerge","2026-03-25T16:25:50.770376+00:00",{"id":95,"slug":96,"title":97,"created_at":98},"69934e86-2fc5-4280-8223-7b917a48ace8","openclaw-ai-commoditization-concerns-en","OpenClaw's Rise Raises Concerns of AI Model Commoditization","2026-03-25T16:26:30.582047+00:00",{"id":100,"slug":101,"title":102,"created_at":103},"b4b2575b-2ac8-46b2-b90e-ab1d7c060797","google-gemini-ai-rollout-2026-en","Google's Gemini AI Rollout Extended to 2026","2026-03-25T16:28:14.808842+00:00",{"id":105,"slug":106,"title":107,"created_at":108},"6e18bc65-42ae-4ad0-b564-67d7f66b979e","meta-llama4-fabricated-results-scandal-en","Meta's Llama 4 Scandal: Fabricated AI Test Results Unveiled","2026-03-25T16:29:15.482836+00:00",{"id":110,"slug":111,"title":112,"created_at":113},"bf888e9d-08be-4f47-996c-7b24b5ab3500","accenture-mistral-ai-deployment-en","Accenture and Mistral AI Team Up for AI Deployment","2026-03-25T16:31:01.894655+00:00",{"id":115,"slug":116,"title":117,"created_at":118},"5382b536-fad2-49c6-ac85-9eb2bae49f35","mistral-ai-high-stakes-2026-en","Mistral AI: Facing High Stakes in 2026","2026-03-25T16:31:39.941974+00:00",{"id":120,"slug":121,"title":122,"created_at":123},"9da3d2d6-b669-4971-ba1d-17fdb3548ed5","cursors-meteoric-rise-pressures-en","Cursor's Meteoric Rise Faces Industry Pressures","2026-03-25T16:32:21.899217+00:00"]