[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-microsoft-agentic-ai-playbook-turns-pilots-into-scale-en":3,"article-related-microsoft-agentic-ai-playbook-turns-pilots-into-scale-en":30,"series-industry-a4511fb8-0894-4143-affa-a8048a5621bd":75},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"a4511fb8-0894-4143-affa-a8048a5621bd","microsoft-agentic-ai-playbook-turns-pilots-into-scale-en","Microsoft’s agentic AI playbook turns pilots into scale","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">A copy-ready playbook for turning \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fai-agent\">AI agent\u003C\u002Fa> experiments into governed \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fopenai-partner-network-enterprise-ai-scale-en\">enterprise scale\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I've been watching teams try to “do \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fagentic-ai\">agentic AI\u003C\u002Fa>” for a while now, and honestly, most of it feels like a demo that wandered into production without a map. The pattern is always the same: someone wires up a shiny agent, it answers a few prompts, everybody nods, and then the hard part shows up. Who owns it? What data can it touch? How do you measure whether it’s actually saving time instead of creating a new support burden? That’s where the enthusiasm starts to leak out of the room.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fmicrosoft\">Microsoft\u003C\u002Fa>’s \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fmicrosoft-build-2026-empowering-our-developers-to-adopt-agentic-ai-at-microsoft\u002F\">Inside Track post from June 2, 2026\u003C\u002Fa> is useful because it doesn’t pretend the answer is “just add agents.” It frames the problem the way real platform teams see it: governance, extensibility, adoption, and operating at enterprise scale. That’s the part I care about. Not the demo. The part after the demo.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The post is written by Lukas Velush and quotes Brian Fielder, vice president of Microsoft Digital, on Microsoft’s “Customer Zero” approach. That phrase matters here because Microsoft is describing its own internal dogfooding as the proving ground for the tooling it later sells. I can work with that. It’s concrete, and it gives us something to steal, adapt, and pressure-test.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Stop treating agents like side projects\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“We’re Customer Zero at Microsoft, which means we’re the first to deploy and use the technology and services that we later sell to our customers.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is: don’t park \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fagent\">agent\u003C\u002Fa> work in a sandbox and call it strategy. Microsoft is saying the internal org has to be the first serious user, because that’s how you find the ugly parts early. I’ve seen teams skip this and then act surprised when the first real business process exposes every missing permission check, every weird edge case, and every half-baked handoff.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782101900407-jero.png\" alt=\"Microsoft’s agentic AI playbook turns pilots into scale\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>If you’re building agents for your company, your own team should be the first customer. Not a fake customer. Not a “pilot” that nobody depends on. A real workflow with real stakes. That’s the only way you learn whether the agent is useful or just entertaining.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into this pattern while helping a team automate support triage. The prototype looked great in a demo. Then we pointed it at actual tickets and found out the taxonomy was inconsistent, the escalation rules were tribal knowledge, and nobody had bothered to define what “resolved” meant. The agent didn’t fail. The process failed. That’s the point Microsoft is making, whether they say it that bluntly or not.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Pick one internal workflow that already hurts.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Make the agent answer to that workflow, not the other way around.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Require a named owner, a rollback path, and a success metric before launch.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Use the internal deployment to surface policy, data, and support gaps.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>That last bullet matters more than people admit. Internal dogfooding is not just validation. It’s a discovery tool for the boring stuff that kills adoption later.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Governance is not the tax you pay after innovation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“We needed to rethink how we foster development, govern innovation, and operate at scale.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That line is the heart of the post for me. Microsoft isn’t separating governance from innovation. It’s admitting they’re the same problem. If you bolt governance on after the fact, you get shadow agents, inconsistent controls, and a mess of local exceptions. I’ve watched this happen enough times to be annoyed before it even starts.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The post points to a secure, governed, extensible platform and references \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fbecoming-a-frontier-firm-a-guide-for-deploying-ai-agents-based-on-our-experience-at-microsoft\u002F\">the readiness guide for deploying AI agents at scale\u003C\u002Fa> and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fgoverning-ai-agents-at-scale-lessons-from-our-journey-at-microsoft\u002F\">governing AI agents at scale\u003C\u002Fa>. That combination tells me Microsoft is trying to standardize the boring parts: approvals, identity, policy, telemetry, and support boundaries.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that a serious agent program needs a control plane, not just a prompt and a backend. If you can’t answer who can create agents, who can approve them, what data they can access, and how they’re monitored, you don’t have a platform. You have a hobby.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Define who can build, publish, approve, and retire agents.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Classify agent types by risk: task bot, departmental agent, enterprise agent.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Put identity and permissions in the design doc, not in a later review.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Track every agent with an inventory, owner, purpose, and data scope.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>I like this framing because it keeps the conversation practical. Governance is not a legal memo. It’s the operational shape of trust.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Platform first, cleverness second\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“It’s all supported by a secure, governed, and extensible platform.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>This is where a lot of AI programs go sideways. They obsess over the cleverness of the agent and ignore the platform underneath it. Microsoft’s wording is boring in the best way. Secure. Governed. Extensible. That’s a platform checklist, not a marketing slogan.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782101898780-gyha.png\" alt=\"Microsoft’s agentic AI playbook turns pilots into scale\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>The post name-drops \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fmicrosoft-copilot\u002Fmicrosoft-copilot-studio\">Copilot Studio\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fmicrosoft-365\u002Fenterprise\u002Fagent-365\">Agent 365\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fazure.microsoft.com\u002F\">Azure\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Flearn.microsoft.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fazure\u002Fdevops\u002F\">Azure DevOps\u003C\u002Fa>, and the \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fmodelcontextprotocol.io\u002F\">Model Context Protocol\u003C\u002Fa>. That list matters because it shows the stack isn’t one product. It’s a chain of capabilities: creation, orchestration, controls, deployment, and integration.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that agentic AI at scale is an architecture problem. You need a place to build, a place to govern, a place to observe, and a place to connect to enterprise systems. If those pieces are scattered, every team invents its own version and your platform team spends the next year cleaning up the wreckage.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen this exact failure mode with workflow automation stacks. One team used low-code tools, another used custom services, a third used scripts with no inventory. Every one of them was “successful” until security asked for a simple answer about data flow. Then everyone started pointing at each other.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Choose a canonical path for agent creation and publishing.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Standardize connectors and integration patterns.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Expose telemetry so teams can measure usage and failure rates.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Document what belongs in the platform and what must stay custom.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If you want adoption, make the platform the easiest path, not the most bureaucratic one. People will tolerate rules. They won’t tolerate friction with no payoff.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Move from productivity toys to business systems\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Empowering our developers to build intelligent agents that can automate workflows, streamline operations, and create new business value.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>This is the part that separates a serious program from a novelty phase. Microsoft is not stopping at “make developers faster,” even though that’s where a lot of AI stories begin. The post explicitly pushes toward workflow automation, operational efficiency, and business value. That’s the real \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fbenchmark\">benchmark\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that an agent should have a job description. Not “be helpful.” A job. Triage incidents. Draft release notes. Route access requests. Summarize telemetry. Trigger approvals. If the agent can’t be tied to a measurable workflow, it’s just a chat layer with extra steps.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The Microsoft Digital examples in the broader story set point toward \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Freclaiming-engineering-time-with-ai-in-azure-devops-at-microsoft\u002F\">engineering time in Azure DevOps\u003C\u002Fa> and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fpowering-ai-value-with-microsoft-365-copilot-extensibility-at-microsoft\u002F\">Microsoft 365 Copilot extensibility\u003C\u002Fa>. That’s the kind of move I respect because it targets actual work queues, not abstract “innovation.”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into a similar shift when a team wanted an internal assistant for engineering docs. The first version answered questions. Fine. The second version started creating pull request summaries, opening tickets, and routing approvals. That’s when people stopped calling it a toy and started asking how to get it into the release process. Different conversation entirely.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Map every agent to one business outcome and one owner.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Measure cycle time, deflection, throughput, or error reduction.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Kill agents that are “used” but don’t change the workflow.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Promote the ones that remove a repeated human handoff.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>That last point is the one I’d underline twice. Real value usually shows up when an agent removes a handoff nobody wanted to own in the first place.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Adoption fails when support is an afterthought\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Translate experimentation into impact.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>This sounds simple, but it’s where most AI programs quietly die. Experimentation is easy to celebrate. Impact is harder because it forces support, training, measurement, and change management into the same room. Microsoft’s wording is blunt enough to be useful: the point is translation, not accumulation.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that an agent program needs an adoption plan the same way a product launch does. If people don’t know how to request an agent, how to trust it, how to report bad behavior, or how to get help when it breaks, usage will stall. Then leadership will blame the technology, which is always convenient and usually wrong.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The post links to a \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fbecoming-a-frontier-firm-a-guide-for-deploying-ai-agents-based-on-our-experience-at-microsoft\u002F\">guide for deploying AI agents based on Microsoft’s experience\u003C\u002Fa>. That’s the right move because deployment is not just technical rollout. It’s social rollout. People need reasons to change habits.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Create a short intake path for new agent requests.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Publish a support model: who fixes what, and in what SLA.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Train users on limits as well as features.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Review adoption monthly, not just launch week.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>I’m opinionated about this because I’ve watched “successful” launches collapse after the first weird edge case. Adoption is what happens after novelty wears off. If you don’t plan for that, you’re not scaling anything.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Connect the stack or watch every team reinvent it\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Connect tools, platforms, and workflows.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>This line is doing a lot of work. Microsoft is basically saying the value is not in isolated agent wins. It’s in the connections between the tools people already use, the platforms that govern them, and the workflows that move work forward. That’s the difference between a demo and an operating model.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that agentic AI has to sit inside the systems of record and the systems of action. If it can’t talk to identity, data, ticketing, source control, or collaboration tools, it will become yet another surface people check out of curiosity and then ignore.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen teams build beautiful agents that lived in a browser tab nobody opened twice. The fix was never “make the model smarter.” It was “put the agent where the work already happens.” Microsoft’s references to \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fmicrosoft-365\u002Fmicrosoft-365-copilot\">Microsoft 365 Copilot\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Flearn.microsoft.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fazure\u002Fdevops\u002F\">Azure DevOps\u003C\u002Fa>, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Fen-us\u002Fmicrosoft-copilot\u002Fmicrosoft-copilot-studio\">Copilot Studio\u003C\u002Fa> all point in that direction.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Embed agents in the tools your teams already use daily.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Use shared identity and policy layers across tools.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Prefer workflow integration over standalone agent portals.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Make cross-system tracing part of the design from day one.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>That integration layer is where a lot of the real engineering work sits. It’s not flashy, but it’s where adoption gets decided.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># Enterprise agentic AI rollout template\n\n## 1) Customer Zero\n- Internal team: [name]\n- Workflow to automate: [workflow]\n- Why this workflow hurts today: [pain]\n- Success metric: [cycle time \u002F deflection \u002F throughput \u002F error reduction]\n\n## 2) Agent scope\n- Agent name: [name]\n- Job to be done: [one sentence]\n- Allowed actions: [list]\n- Forbidden actions: [list]\n- Human approval points: [where humans must confirm]\n\n## 3) Governance\n- Owner: [name]\n- Approver: [name]\n- Data classes allowed: [list]\n- Identity model: [service account \u002F delegated user \u002F other]\n- Audit logging: [where logs live]\n- Review cadence: [weekly \u002F monthly]\n\n## 4) Platform\n- Build surface: [Copilot Studio \u002F custom app \u002F other]\n- Orchestration layer: [tool]\n- Integration points: [identity, ticketing, source control, docs, chat]\n- Telemetry: [usage, failures, latency, escalation rate]\n- Rollback plan: [how to disable safely]\n\n## 5) Adoption\n- Primary users: [group]\n- Training format: [doc \u002F demo \u002F office hours]\n- Support owner: [team]\n- Intake process for new requests: [process]\n- Feedback channel: [channel]\n\n## 6) Measurement\n- Baseline before launch: [number]\n- Target after 30 days: [number]\n- Target after 90 days: [number]\n- Qualitative signals: [trust, ease of use, support burden]\n- Decision rule: [scale \u002F revise \u002F retire]\n\n## 7) Scale decision\n- Expand if: [criteria]\n- Pause if: [criteria]\n- Retire if: [criteria]\n\n## 8) Operating notes\n- Known failure modes: [list]\n- Security review completed: [yes\u002Fno]\n- Compliance review completed: [yes\u002Fno]\n- Next review date: [date]\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>Here’s how I’d use this: fill it out for one real workflow, not a hypothetical one. If you can’t name the owner, the metric, and the rollback plan, you’re not ready to scale. If you can, you’ve got the start of an actual program instead of a pile of AI enthusiasm.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The Microsoft post is useful because it keeps repeating the same idea from different angles: internal proof, platform discipline, governance, and measurable outcomes. That’s not sexy. It is, however, how these things stop being theater.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For more context, I’d read the source post itself, then cross-reference Microsoft’s related Inside Track pieces on \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fbecoming-a-frontier-firm-a-guide-for-deploying-ai-agents-based-on-our-experience-at-microsoft\u002F\">deploying AI agents\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fgoverning-ai-agents-at-scale-lessons-from-our-journey-at-microsoft\u002F\">governance\u003C\u002Fa>, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fhow-work-iq-is-supercharging-our-ai-usage-at-microsoft\u002F\">Work IQ\u003C\u002Fa>. I’m not claiming this template is Microsoft’s. It’s my distillation of the playbook they’re describing, turned into something you can actually use.\u003C\u002Fp>","I break down Microsoft’s Customer Zero agentic AI playbook and turn it into a copy-ready template for governed enterprise adoption.","www.microsoft.com","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.microsoft.com\u002Finsidetrack\u002Fblog\u002Fmicrosoft-build-2026-empowering-our-developers-to-adopt-agentic-ai-at-microsoft\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782101900407-jero.png","industry","en","330f23bd-e3a1-406d-95a0-68a6e483a4a1",[17,18,19,20,21],"agentic AI","enterprise governance","Customer Zero","AI adoption","platform engineering",[23,24,25],"Treat internal teams as the first serious customer for agents.","Put governance, identity, and telemetry in the platform from day one.","Measure agent success by workflow impact, not demo quality.",0,"2026-06-22T04:17:55.929939+00:00","2026-06-22T04:17:55.921+00:00","d19fc184-5852-4c4d-9ec0-db0c4841ac17",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":34,"relatedPosts":38},[32],{"name":17,"slug":33},"agentic-ai",{"id":15,"slug":35,"title":36,"language":37},"microsoft-agentic-ai-playbook-turns-pilots-into-scale-zh","Microsoft 的 agent 模板把試點變規模","zh",[39,45,51,57,63,69],{"id":40,"slug":41,"title":42,"cover_image":43,"image_url":43,"created_at":44,"category":13},"9ed0f345-10c0-4986-ab66-c9e4efdc1366","microsoft-ai-discovery-needs-measurement-not-impressions-en","Microsoft is right: AI discovery needs measurement, not just more imp…","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782102774814-ch0j.png","2026-06-22T04:32:29.563532+00:00",{"id":46,"slug":47,"title":48,"cover_image":49,"image_url":49,"created_at":50,"category":13},"e0d3f187-d49c-4228-bb7e-e97ac94cefce","ai-weekly-2026-w26-en","AI Weekly: 2026-06-15 ~ 2026-06-22","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782101899235-uk0m.png","2026-06-22T04:00:29.937018+00:00",{"id":52,"slug":53,"title":54,"cover_image":55,"image_url":55,"created_at":56,"category":13},"057070db-3fd3-4ba2-97d1-e9aca34edb09","prompt-engineering-pay-gets-real-when-you-ship-systems-en","Prompt engineering pay gets real when you ship systems","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782099200096-noc5.png","2026-06-22T03:32:52.595927+00:00",{"id":58,"slug":59,"title":60,"cover_image":61,"image_url":61,"created_at":62,"category":13},"67c9cca2-c6a9-4bcf-a469-07af89e371f4","aps-iran-talks-bump-turns-diplomacy-into-checklist-en","AP’s Iran talks bump turns diplomacy into a checklist","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782094696143-lrx6.png","2026-06-22T02:17:54.702332+00:00",{"id":64,"slug":65,"title":66,"cover_image":67,"image_url":67,"created_at":68,"category":13},"530095b6-595e-418e-9fd8-8a1eea283597","clawx-openclaw-desktop-app-en","ClawX turns OpenClaw agents into a desktop app","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782091968391-7lbw.png","2026-06-22T01:32:20.647769+00:00",{"id":70,"slug":71,"title":72,"cover_image":73,"image_url":73,"created_at":74,"category":13},"a52f125a-8d93-4b32-b07a-f652d113742c","south-korea-anthropic-ai-safety-cybersecurity-mou-en","South Korea and Anthropic deepen AI safety ties","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782090187963-j9j8.png","2026-06-22T01:02:26.649074+00:00",[76,81,86,91,96,101,106,111,116,121],{"id":77,"slug":78,"title":79,"created_at":80},"d35a1bd9-e709-412e-a2df-392df1dc572a","ai-impact-2026-developments-market-en","AI's Impact in 2026: Key Developments and Market Shifts","2026-03-25T16:20:33.205823+00:00",{"id":82,"slug":83,"title":84,"created_at":85},"5ed27921-5fd6-492e-8c59-78393bf37710","trumps-ai-legislative-framework-en","Trump's AI Legislative Framework: What's Inside?","2026-03-25T16:22:20.005325+00:00",{"id":87,"slug":88,"title":89,"created_at":90},"e454a642-f03c-4794-b185-5f651aebbaca","nvidia-gtc-2026-key-highlights-innovations-en","NVIDIA GTC 2026: Key Highlights and Innovations","2026-03-25T16:22:47.882615+00:00",{"id":92,"slug":93,"title":94,"created_at":95},"0ebb5b16-774a-4922-945d-5f2ce1df5a6d","claude-usage-diversifies-learning-curves-en","Claude Usage Diversifies, Learning Curves Emerge","2026-03-25T16:25:50.770376+00:00",{"id":97,"slug":98,"title":99,"created_at":100},"69934e86-2fc5-4280-8223-7b917a48ace8","openclaw-ai-commoditization-concerns-en","OpenClaw's Rise Raises Concerns of AI Model Commoditization","2026-03-25T16:26:30.582047+00:00",{"id":102,"slug":103,"title":104,"created_at":105},"b4b2575b-2ac8-46b2-b90e-ab1d7c060797","google-gemini-ai-rollout-2026-en","Google's Gemini AI Rollout Extended to 2026","2026-03-25T16:28:14.808842+00:00",{"id":107,"slug":108,"title":109,"created_at":110},"6e18bc65-42ae-4ad0-b564-67d7f66b979e","meta-llama4-fabricated-results-scandal-en","Meta's Llama 4 Scandal: Fabricated AI Test Results Unveiled","2026-03-25T16:29:15.482836+00:00",{"id":112,"slug":113,"title":114,"created_at":115},"bf888e9d-08be-4f47-996c-7b24b5ab3500","accenture-mistral-ai-deployment-en","Accenture and Mistral AI Team Up for AI Deployment","2026-03-25T16:31:01.894655+00:00",{"id":117,"slug":118,"title":119,"created_at":120},"5382b536-fad2-49c6-ac85-9eb2bae49f35","mistral-ai-high-stakes-2026-en","Mistral AI: Facing High Stakes in 2026","2026-03-25T16:31:39.941974+00:00",{"id":122,"slug":123,"title":124,"created_at":125},"9da3d2d6-b669-4971-ba1d-17fdb3548ed5","cursors-meteoric-rise-pressures-en","Cursor's Meteoric Rise Faces Industry Pressures","2026-03-25T16:32:21.899217+00:00"]