[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-mistral-models-guide-turns-picking-easier-en":3,"article-related-mistral-models-guide-turns-picking-easier-en":30,"series-tools-ac744d9a-e6d0-4bef-893e-a0963d46f939":73},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"ac744d9a-e6d0-4bef-893e-a0963d46f939","mistral-models-guide-turns-picking-easier-en","Mistral Models Guide Turns Picking Easier","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">This guide turns Mistral’s lineup into a practical pick list you can copy.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve been using model guides like this for a while, and honestly, most of them read like they were written by someone who never had to ship anything. Everything is “best,” everything is “powerful,” and somehow none of it tells me what to actually put behind a production endpoint. That’s the part that always annoyed me about picking between Mistral models. You get a 7B model, a Mixtral MoE model, a Small model, a Large model, and then Codestral sitting off to the side like it belongs in a different conversation. Great. But which one do I use when I’m trying to keep costs down, stay inside EU residency rules, and not make my app feel dumb?\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>So I dug through \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpristren.com\u002Fblog\u002Fmistral-models-guide\u002F\">Pristren’s Mistral AI Models Guide\u003C\u002Fa> and pulled out the parts that actually matter. The guide is by Mahmudul Haque Qudrati at Pristren, and it’s one of the few writeups that gives concrete model choices instead of vague praise. I’m going to break down the lineup the way I wish someone had done for me: what each model is, what the tradeoff really is, and how I’d choose one in a real codebase.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Stop treating Mistral like one product\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Mistral offers distinct models for different use cases. Understanding the architecture differences matters for making the right choice.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that “Mistral” is not a single answer. It’s a menu. And if you pick from that menu like you’re ordering the same meal every time, you’ll waste money or leave quality on the table.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782079396132-wsei.png\" alt=\"Mistral Models Guide Turns Picking Easier\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>The guide starts with the big idea that I think gets missed a lot: model selection is a workload decision, not a brand decision. If I’m doing cheap classification, I do not want to pay flagship prices. If I’m doing code completion, I want a model trained for code, not a general chat model pretending it can autocomplete a Python file. If I’m handling EU customer data, I care about where requests are processed before I care about \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fbenchmark\">benchmark\u003C\u002Fa> bragging rights.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into this exact problem when I helped wire \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fllms\">LLMs\u003C\u002Fa> into a support pipeline. The team wanted “the best model,” which is usually code for “the model that makes the demo look good.” In production, though, the ticket router, the summarizer, and the coding assistant were three different jobs. One model would have been a bad fit for at least two of them.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: split your use cases first. Don’t ask “Which Mistral model is best?” Ask:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Is this a cheap, high-volume task?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Is this a general assistant task?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Is this code-heavy?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Do I need open weights or EU processing?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>Once I answer those questions, the choice gets boring in a good way.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Mistral 7B is the model I reach for when the job is simple\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Mistral 7B ... outperforms Llama 2 13B on most benchmarks despite being nearly half the size. MMLU score is approximately 63% ... Available open source (Apache 2.0 license) and cheap to self-host.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Mistral 7B is the “small but annoyingly competent” option. It’s not trying to be your everything model. It’s trying to be fast, cheap, and good enough for tasks where nuance matters less than throughput.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The Pristren guide points out the part I care about most: it’s \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fwso2-600m-sale-open-source-enterprise-software-en\">open source\u003C\u002Fa> under Apache 2.0 and cheap to self-host. That matters if you’re running on your own infra, want to avoid API spend, or need a model you can keep close to the metal. The quoted MMLU score around 63% is not frontier territory, but for a 7B model that’s respectable.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve used small models like this for routing, tagging, and basic extraction. The mistake people make is asking them to write polished long-form answers. That’s where you start getting mushy output, hallucinated details, and a lot of “best effort” language. But for constrained tasks, 7B can be plenty.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: use Mistral 7B when the output format is tight and the task is narrow. Think classification, intent detection, simple extraction, lightweight summarization, or local \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Finference\">inference\u003C\u002Fa> where latency and cost matter more than perfect reasoning. If you need consistent structure, pair it with a schema validator and reject malformed output instead of hoping for magic.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>One practical note: if you’re self-hosting, don’t just look at parameter count. Look at memory footprint, batching behavior, and whether your serving stack actually handles the model efficiently. A “small” model that thrashes your GPU is not small in practice.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Mixtral 8x7B is where the weird economics start making sense\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Mixtral 8x7B ... uses 8 expert networks of 7B parameters each. At inference time, only 2 experts activate per token, meaning you get ~13B active parameters while benefiting from 47B total parameters of capacity.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Mixtral gives you a big-model feel without paying dense-model costs on every \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Ftoken\">token\u003C\u002Fa>. That’s the whole trick. It’s a mixture-of-experts model, so only part of the network wakes up for each token. You get more capacity than a dense model of similar active size, but you’re not dragging the whole thing through every inference step.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782079391922-h01s.png\" alt=\"Mistral Models Guide Turns Picking Easier\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>The guide says Mixtral 8x7B lands around MMLU 70%, which is a meaningful jump from Mistral 7B. It also says the model is open source and widely available on \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Follama.com\u002F\">Ollama\u003C\u002Fa> and cloud providers. That makes it easier to test than a lot of “open” models that are technically available but annoying to actually run.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I like MoE models for inference-heavy workloads because the economics usually make sense. The catch is that they’re not always the easiest thing to fine-tune, and they still need all expert weights in memory. So yes, you save compute per token. No, you don’t magically get a tiny deployment.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: use Mixtral when you want better quality than a small dense model but you still care about cost and latency. I’d put it in the middle of the stack for chat support, document processing, and general assistant tasks where I want better language quality than 7B but don’t need flagship pricing. If you’re doing training or aggressive fine-tuning, test carefully before committing. MoE can be a little fussy, and I’ve had enough “why is this so slow on this hardware” moments to be suspicious of easy promises.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Good fit: inference-first production workloads\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Less good: heavy fine-tuning pipelines\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Watch out for: memory pressure and serving complexity\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>Mistral Small is the one I’d use when the spreadsheet is yelling at me\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Mistral Small ... priced at $0.20\u002F$0.60 per 1M tokens (input\u002Foutput). Good balance of quality and cost for classification, extraction, and summarization tasks that do not require frontier capabilities.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Mistral Small is the practical budget option for production work that still needs decent output. It’s not the cheapest thing you can possibly run, but it’s the kind of model you can put in front of real traffic without feeling like every request is a tiny financial mistake.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The pricing in the guide is the part that jumps off the page: $0.20 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens. That is a very different conversation from flagship pricing. If your app does a lot of repetitive classification or summarization, the savings stack up fast.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen teams overbuy here constantly. They drop a flagship model into extraction jobs because they want “accuracy,” then wonder why their monthly bill looks like a ransom note. For structured tasks, a smaller model plus validation often beats a bigger model that’s being used lazily.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: use Mistral Small for high-volume tasks where the answer is bounded. Examples: support ticket categorization, metadata extraction, short summaries, content moderation, and field normalization. The pattern I like is small model first, then fallback to a stronger model only when confidence is low or the output fails validation. That gives you a much cleaner cost curve.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>If you’re building internal tools, this is probably the first model I’d benchmark. A lot of “good enough” workflows are actually “good enough with guardrails,” and Mistral Small fits that shape well.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Mistral Large is the model for when you want one strong default\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Mistral Large ... competitive with GPT-4o. MMLU approximately 81.2% ... Priced at $2\u002F$6 per 1M input\u002Foutput tokens, slightly below GPT-4o's $2.50\u002F$10.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Mistral Large is the flagship option you pick when you want a serious general-purpose model and you don’t want to pay \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fopenai\">OpenAI\u003C\u002Fa>’s top-end output price. The guide’s comparison is pretty blunt: Mistral Large is close enough to GPT-4o on most benchmarks, but cheaper.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This is the model I’d use if I needed a single default for mixed workloads and I didn’t want to maintain a dozen routing rules. It’s the “just make it good” option. The 128k context window also matters, because once you start feeding long docs, chat history, or multi-file context into a model, the practical differences show up fast.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The guide also calls out strong multilingual performance, especially across European languages. That’s not a throwaway detail. If your product lives in French, German, Spanish, Italian, or Portuguese, model quality can vary more than benchmark charts suggest.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: use Mistral Large when quality matters across a broad set of tasks and you want a simpler ops story than building a multi-model stack. It’s a good default for assistants, document analysis, synthesis, and higher-stakes workflows where Small or Mixtral starts feeling a little too casual.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’d still benchmark against your own data. I know that sounds obvious, but I keep seeing teams trust public scores and then act surprised when their domain-specific prompts behave differently. Benchmarks are a starting point, not a purchase order.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Codestral is not a side quest if code is your product\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Codestral ... trained specifically on code with strong performance on HumanEval and code completion tasks. Fills 32k context for code files.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Codestral exists because general models are often “okay” at code and “annoying” at code. If your product is code generation, completion, or developer assistance, a code-specialized model is worth testing directly instead of assuming the general model will be close enough.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The guide mentions HumanEval and 32k context for code files. That’s the kind of detail I care about because code workflows are long-context workflows. You’re not just generating a snippet. You’re dealing with imports, surrounding functions, tests, and sometimes an entire repo slice.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve made the mistake of using a general chat model for coding tasks because I wanted one API everywhere. It works until you need consistent syntax, project-aware completions, or a model that doesn’t get weird about code formatting. Then the cleanup cost starts eating the convenience.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: benchmark Codestral against GPT-4o or whatever your current coding model is, but only on your actual coding tasks. Don’t compare it on generic chat prompts and call it done. Test completion quality, edit distance, test pass rates, and how often the model respects your repo conventions.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>If your product is developer-facing, this is one of the few places where specialization can matter more than raw general intelligence. Code is picky. Models need to be picky too.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>EU residency is a business requirement, not a footnote\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Mistral AI is a French company and stores data in European data centers. For companies under GDPR or with EU data residency requirements, this is a meaningful compliance advantage over American providers.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Mistral can solve a procurement or compliance problem before it becomes an engineering problem. That’s a big deal. Sometimes the best model is the one legal will approve without a week of back-and-forth.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The guide says Mistral explicitly offers EU-based processing, and that’s one of the strongest reasons to choose it. If you’re dealing with regulated data, enterprise procurement, or customers who care where data is processed, this changes the conversation immediately.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve watched teams get blocked not because the model was bad, but because the deployment story was messy. The engineering team wanted one thing, the compliance team wanted another, and the provider’s region story was vague enough to cause pain. If Mistral’s residency story fits your requirements, that can save a lot of grief.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you have EU residency requirements, make this part of the selection criteria before you compare benchmark charts. Ask where data is processed, what the DPA says, and whether the region setup matches your policy. Don’t bury this under “we’ll figure it out later.” Later is when projects stall.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Use Mistral if EU processing is a hard requirement\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Use Mistral if you want a provider with a clearer residency story\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Don’t assume benchmark winners also solve compliance\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode>## Mistral model selection cheat sheet\n\nUse this decision rule:\n\n- Mistral 7B: narrow tasks, local inference, cheap self-hosting, fast classification, simple extraction\n- Mixtral 8x7B: mid-tier quality, inference-heavy production, better than small dense models, open weights\n- Mistral Small: high-volume production tasks, summaries, extraction, classification, cost-sensitive workflows\n- Mistral Large: general-purpose assistant, document analysis, multilingual apps, one strong default model\n- Codestral: code generation, completion, repo-aware developer tooling, coding benchmarks\n\n## My routing policy\n\n1. If the task is code-specific, try Codestral first.\n2. If the task is high-volume and structured, try Mistral Small first.\n3. If the task needs better reasoning or broader language quality, try Mixtral 8x7B.\n4. If the task is general assistant work or mixed document analysis, use Mistral Large.\n5. If EU data residency is required, keep Mistral on the shortlist before anything else.\n\n## Production pattern\n\n- Start with the cheapest model that can pass your acceptance tests.\n- Validate output with schemas or rules.\n- Escalate to a larger model only when confidence is low or validation fails.\n- Benchmark on your own prompts, not just public scores.\n\n## OpenAI-compatible Mistral client\n\nts\nimport OpenAI from \"openai\";\n\nconst client = new OpenAI({\n  apiKey: process.env.MISTRAL_API_KEY,\n  baseURL: \"https:\u002F\u002Fapi.mistral.ai\u002Fv1\",\n});\n\nconst response = await client.chat.completions.create({\n  model: \"mistral-large-latest\",\n  messages: [\n    { role: \"user\", content: \"Your prompt here\" }\n  ],\n});\n\n\n## Quick selection checklist\n\n- Need cheapest acceptable model? Start with Mistral Small.\n- Need open weights? Look at Mistral 7B or Mixtral 8x7B.\n- Need flagship quality with lower cost than GPT-4o? Use Mistral Large.\n- Need coding specialization? Use Codestral.\n- Need EU processing? Verify Mistral’s region and DPA first.\n\n## What I’d actually do\n\nFor most teams, I’d run a small A\u002FB test like this:\n\n- 50 real prompts from production\n- 2 candidate models\n- 1 scoring rubric for accuracy, format compliance, and latency\n- 1 cost estimate per 1M requests\n\nPick the model that wins on your actual workload, not the one that wins the blog post.\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>The nice thing about this template is that it forces the decision to stay practical. No model worship, no hand-wavy “best overall” nonsense. Just task, cost, and fit.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>One last thing: the original Pristren post is a solid starting point, but the numbers and pricing will change. I’d treat the guide as a snapshot and confirm current docs before you lock anything into production. Original source: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpristren.com\u002Fblog\u002Fmistral-models-guide\u002F\">https:\u002F\u002Fpristren.com\u002Fblog\u002Fmistral-models-guide\u002F\u003C\u002Fa>. The structure and wording here are my own breakdown of that source, not a copy of it.\u003C\u002Fp>","A practical breakdown of Mistral’s model lineup, pricing, and when I’d pick each one over OpenAI.","pristren.com","https:\u002F\u002Fpristren.com\u002Fblog\u002Fmistral-models-guide\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782079396132-wsei.png","tools","en","bb58f74c-edbb-47d8-b59a-c6be2ee9fa77",[17,18,19,20,21],"Mistral AI","Mixtral","LLM comparison","MoE","OpenAI-compatible",[23,24,25],"Pick Mistral Small for structured, high-volume tasks where cost matters most.","Use Mixtral 8x7B when you want better quality than a small dense model without jumping to flagship pricing.","Choose Mistral Large for one strong general-purpose model, and Codestral when code is the main workload.",0,"2026-06-21T22:02:51.767694+00:00","2026-06-21T22:02:51.755+00:00","b8a0aab4-7d3b-4162-b83a-af99c553f040",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":11,"relatedPosts":36},[32,34],{"name":17,"slug":33},"mistral-ai",{"name":20,"slug":35},"moe",[37,43,49,55,61,67],{"id":38,"slug":39,"title":40,"cover_image":41,"image_url":41,"created_at":42,"category":13},"6dc55ef5-7d20-4012-8eef-c4795a7ea38b","googles-99-speaker-turns-home-into-gemini-chat-en","Google’s $99 speaker turns home into Gemini chat","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782122605293-a634.png","2026-06-22T10:03:02.737417+00:00",{"id":44,"slug":45,"title":46,"cover_image":47,"image_url":47,"created_at":48,"category":13},"573d2a49-84d8-4017-9118-55bc5586dab9","install-openclaw-windows-powershell-wsl2-en","Install OpenClaw on Windows with PowerShell","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782093770144-gllk.png","2026-06-22T02:02:28.698991+00:00",{"id":50,"slug":51,"title":52,"cover_image":53,"image_url":53,"created_at":54,"category":13},"cd0c44d6-1db4-4050-beba-6c3dfc74112a","anthropic-github-repositories-claude-code-push-en","91 Anthropic GitHub repos showcase Claude Code push","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782082971121-zlxw.png","2026-06-21T23:02:28.93858+00:00",{"id":56,"slug":57,"title":58,"cover_image":59,"image_url":59,"created_at":60,"category":13},"decd40da-6ddd-45f0-835f-7981d0f45111","cudf-turns-pandas-code-into-gpu-runs-en","cuDF turns pandas code into GPU runs","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782058729869-s0tn.png","2026-06-21T16:18:27.628499+00:00",{"id":62,"slug":63,"title":64,"cover_image":65,"image_url":65,"created_at":66,"category":13},"a0d9f17c-ff77-49c2-bf56-d78cebffc801","bigquery-vectorized-python-udfs-arrow-en","BigQuery vectorized Python UDFs with Arrow","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782027164452-1u37.png","2026-06-21T07:32:20.57785+00:00",{"id":68,"slug":69,"title":70,"cover_image":71,"image_url":71,"created_at":72,"category":13},"e3deb33e-ba49-4722-aeaf-eb85c71d6338","apples-gemini-powered-siri-seo-stakes-en","Apple’s Gemini-Powered Siri Raises SEO Stakes","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782011872881-96h8.png","2026-06-21T03:17:28.996623+00:00",[74,79,84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119],{"id":75,"slug":76,"title":77,"created_at":78},"8008f1a9-7a00-4bad-88c9-3eedc9c6b4b1","surepath-ai-mcp-policy-controls-en","SurePath AI's New MCP Policy Controls Enhance AI Security","2026-03-26T01:26:52.222015+00:00",{"id":80,"slug":81,"title":82,"created_at":83},"27e39a8f-b65d-4f7b-a875-859e2b210156","mcp-standard-ai-tools-2026-en","MCP Standard in 2026: Integrating AI Tools","2026-03-26T01:27:43.127519+00:00",{"id":85,"slug":86,"title":87,"created_at":88},"165f9a19-c92d-46ba-b3f0-7125f662921d","rag-2026-transforming-enterprise-ai-en","How RAG in 2026 is Transforming Enterprise AI","2026-03-26T01:28:11.485236+00:00",{"id":90,"slug":91,"title":92,"created_at":93},"6a2a8e6e-b956-49d8-be12-cc47bdc132b2","mastering-ai-prompts-2026-guide-en","Mastering AI Prompts: A 2026 Guide for Developers","2026-03-26T01:29:07.835148+00:00",{"id":95,"slug":96,"title":97,"created_at":98},"3ab2c67e-4664-4c67-a013-687a2f605814","garry-tan-open-sources-claude-code-toolkit-en","Garry Tan Open-Sources a Claude Code Toolkit","2026-03-26T08:26:20.245934+00:00",{"id":100,"slug":101,"title":102,"created_at":103},"66a7cbf8-7e76-41d4-9bbf-eaca9761bf69","github-ai-projects-to-watch-in-2026-en","20 GitHub AI Projects to Watch in 2026","2026-03-26T08:28:09.752027+00:00",{"id":105,"slug":106,"title":107,"created_at":108},"9f332fda-eace-448a-a292-2283951eee71","practical-github-guide-learning-ml-2026-en","A Practical GitHub Guide to Learning ML in 2026","2026-03-27T01:16:50.125678+00:00",{"id":110,"slug":111,"title":112,"created_at":113},"1b1f637d-0f4d-42bd-974b-07b53829144d","aiml-2026-student-ai-ml-lab-repo-review-en","AIML-2026 Is a Bare-Bones Student Lab Repo","2026-03-27T01:21:51.661231+00:00",{"id":115,"slug":116,"title":117,"created_at":118},"6d1bf3f6-e191-4d30-b55b-8a0722fa6afe","ai-trending-github-repos-and-research-feeds-en","AI Trending Tracks Repos and Research Feeds","2026-03-27T01:31:35.709532+00:00",{"id":120,"slug":121,"title":122,"created_at":123},"010539a1-4c3a-4bd3-937a-26616422ee0d","awesome-ai-for-science-research-tools-map-en","Awesome AI for Science Is Becoming a Real Research Map","2026-03-27T01:46:50.89513+00:00"]