[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-moneygram-on-solana-turns-payments-into-rails-en":3,"article-related-moneygram-on-solana-turns-payments-into-rails-en":30,"series-blockchain-bec0b478-94e6-4757-97ad-7245b2efe5ef":76},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"bec0b478-94e6-4757-97ad-7245b2efe5ef","moneygram-on-solana-turns-payments-into-rails-en","MoneyGram on Solana turns payments into rails","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">MoneyGram’s \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fsolana\">Solana\u003C\u002Fa> move shows how enterprises can ship onchain payments without pretending blockchain is simple.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I've been watching enterprise blockchain pitches for years, and most of them feel like they were written by someone who has never had to ship a payment product at 2 a.m. The slides are always clean. The language is always confident. Then you get to the actual work and everything gets ugly fast: compliance, settlement timing, retries, custody, partner risk, regional rules, and the part nobody likes to say out loud, which is that your “blockchain strategy” is usually a mess of half-connected systems.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That’s why this MoneyGram announcement caught my attention. Not because it screams novelty. It doesn’t. It’s more practical than that, which is rarer and more useful. MoneyGram joined the \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fsolana.com\u002Fnews\u002Fmoney-gram-joins-solana-developer-platform\">Solana Developer Platform\u003C\u002Fa> as an infrastructure partner and also became an active validator on Solana. That’s not a vanity move. It says they want a seat at the protocol level, not just a logo on a partnership page.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>And honestly, that’s the part worth unpacking. When a company like MoneyGram shows up in the plumbing instead of the marketing, I pay attention. That usually means someone inside the org has stopped asking, “How do we sound innovative?” and started asking, “How do we move money faster without breaking the business?”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>MoneyGram didn’t join a buzzword. It joined the plumbing\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“Solana Foundation today announced that MoneyGram has joined Solana Developer Platform (SDP) as an infrastructure partner and has simultaneously become an active validator on the Solana network.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is simple: MoneyGram is not just experimenting with an app or a pilot. It’s participating in the network itself. Running a validator is a different kind of commitment than launching a consumer feature. It’s closer to saying, “We want this system to exist, and we want to help keep it honest.”\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782441198329-f2nt.png\" alt=\"MoneyGram on Solana turns payments into rails\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>I’ve seen a lot of enterprise crypto work stall because it lives too far from the core system. A company launches a branded wallet, a tokenized loyalty thing, or a sandbox demo, then everyone claps and nothing changes in production. Validator participation is different. It implies operational skin in the game.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The Solana announcement also frames MoneyGram as an infrastructure partner on the \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fplatform.solana.com\">Solana Developer Platform\u003C\u002Fa>, which Solana describes as an \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fapi\">API\u003C\u002Fa>-driven platform for enterprises and financial institutions. That matters because most large companies do not want to build directly against raw protocol complexity. They want a controlled path in, with APIs, compliance-friendly abstractions, and enough guardrails that the legal team doesn’t explode.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you’re evaluating an onchain strategy, separate “brand participation” from “infra participation.” Ask which parts of the stack the partner actually touches.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Are they just integrating a payment flow?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Are they operating infrastructure?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Are they validating, indexing, settling, or routing?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If the answer is only “we did a pilot,” I’d treat the announcement as marketing. If the answer includes protocol participation, now we’re talking about actual operational change.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The real signal is compliance, not crypto theater\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“We believe the future of global money movement will be built on open, interoperable stablecoin rails that anyone, anywhere can access. Building that future requires compliance, regulatory clarity and operational scale.” — Anthony Soohoo, MoneyGram Chairman and CEO\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>This is the line I would pin to the wall. Not because it sounds visionary, but because it’s annoyingly practical. Money movement does not fail because the tech demo was slow. It fails because the business can’t survive the regulatory and operational burden that comes with moving real value across borders.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>MoneyGram has been at this for a long time. The company says it has spent more than five years integrating blockchain into payment infrastructure. That’s the kind of timeline that tells me this isn’t a “we heard \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fstablecoins\">stablecoins\u003C\u002Fa> are hot” decision. It sounds more like a company that already learned the hard way that payment rails are political, messy, and full of edge cases.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into this same problem when I helped teams think through cross-border payout flows. Everyone starts with speed and cost. Then the conversation shifts to KYC, sanctions screening, local settlement partners, treasury exposure, and what happens when one corridor works and another corridor gets blocked. That’s where most clean architecture diagrams die.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Solana’s framing is that SDP gives enterprises a unified, API-based gateway to build on Solana from day one, abstracting away blockchain complexity while connecting directly to protocol capabilities. That’s the pitch enterprise buyers actually want to hear. They don’t want to become chain experts. They want to ship a compliant product without rebuilding their org chart.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you’re writing an enterprise blockchain proposal, make compliance and operations first-class sections, not footnotes.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>List the regulatory constraints before the chain choice.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Map the operational owners for settlement, treasury, and reconciliation.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Define which parts are onchain and which stay offchain.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If you skip that work, you’re not designing a payment system. You’re writing a demo.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>MoneyGram is betting on interoperability, not one more silo\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“MoneyGram’s engagement with Solana represents another step in enabling interoperability between traditional payment rails and blockchain rails.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That sentence is doing a lot of work, but it’s the right work. Interoperability is the actual prize here. Nobody serious wants a future where blockchain lives in a fenced garden and payment networks live somewhere else, with a dozen brittle integrations duct-taped between them.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782441199748-2154.png\" alt=\"MoneyGram on Solana turns payments into rails\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>MoneyGram’s network is huge by any normal standard. Solana’s announcement says the company has been built over 85 years, serves more than 60 million active customers, and reaches nearly half a million retail locations plus billions of digital endpoints. Those numbers matter because they explain why this partnership isn’t just about “going onchain.” It’s about meeting users where money already moves.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That’s the part people miss when they talk about stablecoins like they’re a separate universe. Stablecoins are useful when they connect to existing distribution, not when they sit in a vacuum. If you can’t bridge the old rails and the new rails, you haven’t solved anything. You’ve just added one more place for value to get stuck.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen teams obsess over whether a chain is fast enough while ignoring the actual route the money takes. That’s backwards. The route is the product. The chain is just one piece of it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: draw the full money path before you choose your stack.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Where does the user start?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Where does the value settle?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Which systems need to reconcile?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>What happens when the onchain and offchain states disagree?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If your diagram ends at “send transaction,” it’s incomplete. The hard part starts after that.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>SDP is basically the enterprise wrapper people kept asking for\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“SDP gives enterprises like MoneyGram a unified, API-based gateway to build on Solana from day one, abstracting away blockchain complexity while connecting directly to Solana’s protocol capabilities.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That’s the sentence that explains why this announcement matters beyond MoneyGram. Solana is clearly trying to package the chain for enterprise use without making the chain feel fake. That balance is hard. Go too raw and enterprises bounce. Hide too much and developers hate you because the abstraction leaks everywhere.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Solana is also positioning SDP alongside names like \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mastercard.com\">Mastercard\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.worldpay.com\">Worldpay\u003C\u002Fa>, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.westernunion.com\">Western Union\u003C\u002Fa>. I’m not going to pretend those logos magically prove anything, but they do tell a story: the institutions that already move money at scale are looking for a way into Solana that doesn’t require them to become protocol nerds overnight.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>From a developer perspective, this is basically an invitation to build with fewer excuses. If the platform can handle enterprise onboarding, then the burden shifts from “can we understand the chain?” to “can we design a product that actually solves a payment problem?” That’s a much better question.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve been in enough architecture reviews to know that abstraction is not the enemy. Bad abstraction is. Good abstraction lets teams move faster without hiding the parts they’ll need later. If SDP is doing its job, it should let a payments team start with APIs and only drop down into protocol details when the business case is real.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: when you evaluate a platform layer, test for three things.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Can a product team start without chain specialists?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Can engineering still reach protocol-level controls when needed?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Does the abstraction help compliance, or just rename complexity?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>If the answer to all three is yes, you’ve got something worth building on. If not, it’s just a prettier dashboard.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Validator status is a trust move, not a side quest\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>“MoneyGram’s entry into the Solana ecosystem is their latest step in more than five years of deliberate investment in blockchain-native infrastructure.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>Becoming a validator is the part of this announcement that feels most serious to me. A lot of companies say they care about decentralization, resilience, or network health. Fewer of them actually run the infrastructure. That’s where the rhetoric meets reality.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Validator participation changes the relationship. You’re no longer only consuming the network. You’re helping sustain it. For a financial institution, that can be a strategic signal to partners, regulators, and internal teams that the blockchain layer is not an experiment sitting in the corner. It’s part of the operating model.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen enterprises underestimate how much internal confidence matters. If procurement, risk, or compliance sees the company running a validator, the conversation shifts. It becomes less about “why are we touching crypto?” and more about “what operational role are we playing in this system?” That’s a better conversation to have.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Still, I wouldn’t romanticize it. Running a validator does not magically make a company decentralized or aligned with every community value. It just means they’re participating in the network in a more meaningful way than a surface-level integration.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you’re planning a protocol partnership, decide what level of participation matches your goals.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Consumer integration only?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Enterprise infra partner?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Validator or node operator?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Liquidity, settlement, or treasury participation?\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>Pick the smallest participation level that actually supports your business case. Anything bigger should have a clear reason, not just a better press line.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>What I’d copy from this if I were building an enterprise payment playbook\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Here’s the part I’d steal, and I mean that in the best possible way. MoneyGram and Solana are not selling a vague “future of finance” story. They’re building a layered approach: protocol participation, enterprise abstraction, compliance framing, and a real distribution network already in place.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That’s a much stronger model than chasing a one-off pilot. It gives you a way to explain why the chain matters, why the company matters, and why the customer should care. Most blockchain announcements fail because they only answer one of those questions.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>From a product standpoint, the lesson is straightforward. If you want enterprises to adopt onchain rails, stop leading with the chain and start leading with the operating constraints. Show how the chain reduces friction inside a regulated workflow. Show who owns the risk. Show how the money gets from A to B without turning your ops team into archaeologists.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>And if you’re on the vendor side, don’t sell “decentralization” as a vibe. Sell integration paths, compliance controls, and operational clarity. That’s what gets budget signed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># Enterprise onchain payments strategy template\n\n## Goal\nWe are using blockchain rails to improve [cross-border payouts \u002F treasury \u002F settlement \u002F merchant payments] while keeping compliance and operations intact.\n\n## Why this now\n- Existing rails create friction in [speed \u002F cost \u002F reconciliation \u002F reach].\n- Our current workflow depends on [banks \u002F processors \u002F intermediaries] that add delay or complexity.\n- We need a model that supports both fiat and stablecoin movement.\n\n## Network role\nWe will participate as one of the following:\n- Consumer integration partner\n- Enterprise infrastructure partner\n- Node \u002F validator operator\n- Settlement \u002F treasury participant\n\n## What stays offchain\n- KYC \u002F KYB checks\n- Sanctions screening\n- Customer support workflows\n- Internal approvals\n- Core accounting system\n\n## What goes onchain\n- Value transfer\n- Settlement events\n- Programmatic routing\n- Treasury movement where appropriate\n\n## Platform requirements\n- API-based integration\n- Compliance controls\n- Audit logs\n- Retry \u002F reconciliation support\n- Clear operational ownership\n- Ability to expand from pilot to production\n\n## Risk checklist\n- Regulatory approval path\n- Counterparty risk\n- Liquidity management\n- Regional restrictions\n- Reconciliation failure handling\n- Incident response ownership\n\n## Success metrics\n- Settlement time\n- Cost per transfer\n- Reconciliation accuracy\n- Corridor coverage\n- Operational overhead\n- Production uptime\n\n## Launch plan\n1. Pick one corridor or product line.\n2. Define the offchain and onchain boundaries.\n3. Map compliance and treasury owners.\n4. Ship a controlled production pilot.\n5. Expand only after reconciliation and support are stable.\n\n## Decision rule\nIf the blockchain layer does not reduce cost, delay, or operational friction in a measurable way, we do not ship it.\n\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>This is my honest read: the MoneyGram announcement is less about hype and more about maturity. It shows a company that already knows the ugly parts of payments and is trying to build with them, not around them.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Original source: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fsolana.com\u002Fnews\u002Fmoney-gram-joins-solana-developer-platform\">solana.com\u002Fnews\u002Fmoney-gram-joins-solana-developer-platform\u003C\u002Fa>. My breakdown is original commentary built from that announcement, plus practical implementation advice based on how enterprise payment systems usually fail in the real world.\u003C\u002Fp>","I break down MoneyGram’s Solana move and give you a copy-ready template for enterprise onchain payment strategy.","solana.com","https:\u002F\u002Fsolana.com\u002Fnews\u002Fmoney-gram-joins-solana-developer-platform",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782441198329-f2nt.png","blockchain","en","1de337be-1a1b-46a0-b33e-03f4a9f5ed22",[17,18,19,20,21],"Solana","MoneyGram","payments","stablecoins","enterprise blockchain",[23,24,25],"MoneyGram’s move is about protocol-level participation, not a surface partnership.","The useful signal is compliance-first infrastructure, not crypto branding.","A good enterprise onchain plan needs explicit offchain\u002Fonchain boundaries.",0,"2026-06-26T02:32:49.137458+00:00","2026-06-26T02:32:49.122+00:00","add0aee4-2377-4e26-96e8-e3e1219cdd7e",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":35,"relatedPosts":39},[32,34],{"name":17,"slug":33},"solana",{"name":20,"slug":20},{"id":15,"slug":36,"title":37,"language":38},"moneygram-on-solana-turns-payments-into-rails-zh","MoneyGram 讓支付變成 rails","zh",[40,46,52,58,64,70],{"id":41,"slug":42,"title":43,"cover_image":44,"image_url":44,"created_at":45,"category":13},"82150981-4082-4674-8bee-7197012688f5","moneygram-solana-validator-infrastructure-not-marketing-en","MoneyGram’s Solana validator move is infrastructure, not marketing","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782442064988-tjfn.png","2026-06-26T02:47:20.361399+00:00",{"id":47,"slug":48,"title":49,"cover_image":50,"image_url":50,"created_at":51,"category":13},"0d2a2c06-01b6-4bfe-a955-ca9d7e83bac0","cryptojobslist-remote-web3-jobs-guide-en","CryptoJobsList turns 353 remote roles into a job map","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782388106338-k9zt.png","2026-06-25T11:47:57.087511+00:00",{"id":53,"slug":54,"title":55,"cover_image":56,"image_url":56,"created_at":57,"category":13},"89b47f11-7228-41e8-99c6-e3673a5968f9","web3-jobs-hiring-june-2026-en","4 Web3 jobs that are hiring now in June 2026","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782387169930-smnu.png","2026-06-25T11:32:25.359949+00:00",{"id":59,"slug":60,"title":61,"cover_image":62,"image_url":62,"created_at":63,"category":13},"0b30b200-b1f5-4ca8-8d70-ff8eb5564bce","grok-ai-price-surge-liquidity-warning-en","Grok AI’s price surge is a liquidity warning, not a thesis","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782375471245-fpap.png","2026-06-25T08:17:25.177026+00:00",{"id":65,"slug":66,"title":67,"cover_image":68,"image_url":68,"created_at":69,"category":13},"7d11570c-307c-4ed6-ae8c-bab4e21825bd","cuomo-blockchain-lower-banking-fees-en","Cuomo says blockchain can lower banking fees","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782358377250-9v5u.png","2026-06-25T03:32:31.607731+00:00",{"id":71,"slug":72,"title":73,"cover_image":74,"image_url":74,"created_at":75,"category":13},"2d1e7ec9-289a-43ae-a94f-eccf137a0d27","jumpbit-solana-token-creator-60-seconds-en","Jumpbit’s Solana token creator cuts launch time to 60s","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782281884683-mea7.png","2026-06-24T06:17:38.111857+00:00",[77,82,87,92,97,102,107,112,117,122],{"id":78,"slug":79,"title":80,"created_at":81},"cdf2780b-1da6-4aca-a87b-f0974b815b03","moonpay-open-wallet-standard-ai-payments-en","MoonPay's Open Wallet Standard Targets AI Payments","2026-03-28T03:08:33.547032+00:00",{"id":83,"slug":84,"title":85,"created_at":86},"f06da3a4-3b15-4c7b-a250-6077505f5119","next-gen-crypto-simulators-ai-web3-training-en","Next-Gen Crypto Simulators Are Getting Smarter","2026-04-01T09:36:34.200192+00:00",{"id":88,"slug":89,"title":90,"created_at":91},"0794f597-b908-402a-b660-729034ffdbf6","rtk-cuts-claude-code-token-spend-en","RTK cuts Claude Code token spend fast","2026-04-01T10:24:29.50277+00:00",{"id":93,"slug":94,"title":95,"created_at":96},"5101ffbf-7ea9-4baa-b5e2-64729ff55b20","openclaw-flaw-exposes-ai-admin-hijack-risk-en","Openclaw Flaw Exposes AI Admin Hijack Risk","2026-04-01T13:12:33.481569+00:00",{"id":98,"slug":99,"title":100,"created_at":101},"fadea65e-f7c8-41b0-a186-809d21787b4c","how-web3-marketing-changed-in-2026-en","How Web3 Marketing Changed in 2026","2026-04-02T01:36:36.504086+00:00",{"id":103,"slug":104,"title":105,"created_at":106},"88f88741-ff27-41d1-8151-776d0afb9508","ai-agentic-defi-web3-grants-march-2026-en","AI, Agentic DeFi, and Web3 Grants to Watch","2026-04-02T05:51:37.696422+00:00",{"id":108,"slug":109,"title":110,"created_at":111},"43fafe43-772e-48c8-bb95-da8d64cf60e3","why-crypto-is-fixated-on-ai-agents-en","Why Crypto Is Fixated on AI Agents","2026-04-02T05:54:29.121481+00:00",{"id":113,"slug":114,"title":115,"created_at":116},"320ef5e4-fe56-47ab-9a92-290d6fbd3f60","web3-explained-what-it-is-why-it-matters-en","Web3 Explained: What It Is and Why It Matters","2026-04-02T06:15:33.001112+00:00",{"id":118,"slug":119,"title":120,"created_at":121},"f49cffaf-2c57-4f48-9486-7062cca91ba0","trust-wallet-ai-trading-agents-220m-users-en","Trust Wallet Adds AI Trading Agents for 220M Users","2026-04-02T06:24:28.043029+00:00",{"id":123,"slug":124,"title":125,"created_at":126},"2b8501e2-39af-4de3-ade1-29616a58e9fb","trust-wallet-agent-kit-ai-trade-25-chains-en","Trust Wallet's Agent Kit Lets AI Trade on 25+ Chains","2026-04-02T06:27:33.425312+00:00"]