[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-redmi-note-17-battery-camera-price-breakdown-en":3,"article-related-redmi-note-17-battery-camera-price-breakdown-en":30,"series-tools-dcdffb2f-a2f3-4079-8f6c-cdb2af13cc8e":73},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"dcdffb2f-a2f3-4079-8f6c-cdb2af13cc8e","redmi-note-17-battery-camera-price-breakdown-en","Redmi Note 17 turns mid-range into battery bulk","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">Xiaomi’s Redmi Note 17 lineup turns battery-first specs into a buying framework.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve been watching mid-range phones get weird for a while now. Not “weird” in a fun way either. Weird like every launch page says the same stuff: brighter screen, faster chip, better camera, same battery life, next question. Then you open the spec sheet and realize the only real change is a slightly shinier rectangle with the same old 5,000-ish mAh cell glued inside it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>So when I hit the Redmi Note 17 write-up on \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fthe-gadgeteer.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fredmi-note-17-series\u002F\">The Gadgeteer\u003C\u002Fa>, I stopped skimming. Xiaomi didn’t just bump a number or slap on a new color. It pushed the standard model to 8,000mAh, the Pro to 9,000mAh, and the rumored Pro Max into absurd territory. That’s not a minor spec tweak. That changes how you think about charging, travel, camera tradeoffs, and even which phone should be the “cheap” one.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What I want to do here is strip the marketing fluff off the lineup and show you what actually matters if you’re choosing between the Redmi Note 17, Note 17 Pro, and the leaked Pro Max. I’m also going to turn the whole thing into a reusable template at the end, because once you see how Xiaomi is framing this family, you can apply the same logic to almost any phone launch.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Battery is the whole story here, and Xiaomi knows it\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>The headline number is the 8,000mAh battery, a big leap from the 5,800mAh cell in last year’s model.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That line from The Gadgeteer is the center of the whole article, and honestly it should be. The Redmi Note 17 is being sold on endurance first, everything else second. Xiaomi is saying, very plainly, that the boring part of a phone is now the differentiator. I’m not mad about that. I’m tired of phones pretending a 5,000mAh battery is enough just because the marketing department found a nice render.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784138630965-83b5.png\" alt=\"Redmi Note 17 turns mid-range into battery bulk\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>What this actually means is simple: the standard Redmi Note 17 is not trying to win the camera race or the chipset arms race. It’s trying to last. A 7-inch OLED panel, 120Hz refresh, and 1,200 nits of brightness are all respectable, but the battery is the reason this phone exists. The 45W wired charging is fine, and the 22.5W reverse wired charging is the little extra that makes the spec sheet feel practical instead of just large for the sake of large.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into this exact decision pattern on a recent budget phone recommendation. The buyer didn’t care about benchmarks. They cared about whether the phone would make it through a day of maps, photos, hotspot use, and music without becoming a brick by 4 p.m. That’s the audience Xiaomi is chasing here. Not enthusiasts who want the fastest silicon. People who are sick of carrying a charger like it’s part of the phone.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: when you read a phone spec sheet, put battery capacity and charging speed at the top, then ask how the rest of the device supports that choice. If the battery is huge but the screen is inefficient, that’s a red flag. If the battery is huge and the chip is modest, that’s probably intentional. The Redmi Note 17 looks like the latter.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Use the battery number to infer the phone’s real priority.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Check charging speed against battery size, not against marketing claims.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Ignore “all-day battery” language unless the cell is meaningfully larger than the norm.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The standard Note 17 is the one Xiaomi wants normal people to buy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The base model is the cleanest example of how Xiaomi is segmenting this family. It gets the 8,000mAh battery, a 7-inch OLED display, a 120Hz refresh rate, and a Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 built on 4nm. That’s not flagship language. That’s practical language. The phone also gets an optical in-display fingerprint sensor, IP65 protection, Gorilla Glass 7i, and a plastic frame to keep the price down.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Xiaomi is making a value phone that doesn’t feel stripped bare. The frame being plastic is not a surprise, and I don’t think it’s the insult people make it out to be. If the tradeoff buys you battery capacity and keeps the phone from drifting into mid-premium pricing, I can live with it. I’d rather have a plastic frame and a battery I don’t think about than a metal sandwich that needs a power bank by dinner.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen this mistake in product planning a hundred times: teams keep adding premium-feeling materials to budget devices and then act shocked when the final price creeps up and the thing stops making sense. Xiaomi is doing the opposite here. It’s putting the money where users will feel it every day. Battery. Display. Durability. The camera is just “good enough” at 50MP, which is probably the right call for this tier.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you’re comparing budget phones, separate “daily feel” features from “spec sheet ego” features. Daily feel is battery, brightness, refresh rate, and basic durability. Ego features are the stuff that sounds impressive in a launch post but doesn’t change your actual week. The Redmi Note 17 base model is built around daily feel.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Good budget phones should prioritize endurance over thinness.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Plastic frames are acceptable when they protect battery and price.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Camera megapixels matter less than whether the phone survives your day.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The Pro model is where Xiaomi stops being polite\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The Redmi Note 17 Pro is the one I’d actually pause on. It jumps to a 6.83-inch flat 1.5K OLED display, claims 3,500 nits of peak brightness, and uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2. Then Xiaomi goes bigger on battery again: 9,000mAh with 67W wired charging and 22.5W reverse wired charging. That’s a ridiculous amount of battery for a phone that’s still supposed to live in the mid-range.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784138621224-w5v1.png\" alt=\"Redmi Note 17 turns mid-range into battery bulk\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Xiaomi is trying to create a “sweet spot” model that feels overbuilt in the best way. The 200MP main camera is the obvious attention-grabber, but the battery warranty is the detail I care about. Xiaomi has said it will replace the battery for free if health drops below 80 percent during the coverage window, which reporting says is roughly four to five years. The exact terms may vary by region, so I’d still read the official listing before buying, but the idea is smart. It tells me Xiaomi knows battery anxiety is a real selling point now.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into a similar issue with a laptop lineup a while back. The middle model was the one with the least annoying tradeoffs: not too expensive, not too compromised, and just enough headroom that you didn’t feel punished for not buying the top tier. That’s what the Note 17 Pro is trying to be. The base model is the sensible one. The Pro is the one that makes you think, “Okay, this is probably enough phone for years.”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: when a manufacturer offers a middle tier, don’t ask whether it is “worth the extra money” in the abstract. Ask which pain it removes. In this case, the Pro removes battery anxiety, improves camera hardware, and boosts display quality. That’s a real package, not just a spec bump.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>If you’re buying for yourself, the Pro is the model to compare against your current phone’s frustrations. If your current device dies early, gets too dim outdoors, or makes you compromise on camera quality, this is the tier that matters.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>200MP cameras are only useful if the rest of the phone keeps up\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The Redmi Note 17 Pro’s 200MP main sensor sounds loud, and Xiaomi clearly wants it to sound loud. But I’ve been around enough phone launches to know megapixels are the easiest thing to oversell. A bigger number can mean more detail, sure, but it can also just mean more marketing copy. If the sensor, image processing, lens quality, and storage behavior don’t line up, the number is mostly decoration.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Xiaomi is using the 200MP camera as a signal, not just a spec. It’s saying this isn’t a throwaway mid-range camera anymore. Pair that with a 32MP selfie camera and the company is trying to make the phone feel more complete for people who shoot a lot of social content, portraits, and quick everyday photos.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve lost count of how many phones I’ve tested where the camera app looked impressive on paper and then fell apart the moment lighting got messy. That’s why I care less about the headline resolution and more about whether the rest of the phone suggests confidence. A big battery helps. A bright display helps. Better protection helps. Those are the signs that the camera isn’t being treated like an afterthought.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: treat megapixels like a starting point, not a conclusion. Ask whether the phone has the battery, display, and durability to support heavier photo use. If a device is clearly built for long sessions and outdoor use, the camera upgrade is more likely to matter in practice.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Megapixels matter less than the whole imaging pipeline.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Battery and brightness affect how often you’ll actually use the camera.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Mid-range phones with strong cameras need balanced hardware elsewhere.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The leaked Pro Max is Xiaomi flexing, not Xiaomi explaining\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The Pro Max is where the story gets messy. The Gadgeteer clearly labels several details as leaked, and that matters. The claims are big: a 10,000mAh-or-more battery, 100W charging, a 200MP Samsung ISOCELL HP5 sensor, an 8MP ultrawide, a 32MP front camera, and a roughly 7-inch display. Processor reporting is also split, with one leak pointing to a MediaTek Dimensity 7500.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the Pro Max is not something I’d treat as confirmed product reality yet. It’s a rumor-shaped promise. But even rumors tell you where a company wants the conversation to go. Xiaomi wants people talking about battery size that sounds borderline ridiculous for a mainstream phone. That alone says a lot about where the market is headed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen this play before: brands leak the outrageous model to make the confirmed models feel more reasonable. If the Pro Max has a 10,000mAh battery, then the 9,000mAh Pro suddenly looks restrained. If the Pro looks restrained, then the 8,000mAh base model feels downright normal. It’s a ladder, and it’s intentional.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: when a spec is still a leak, don’t build your buying decision around it. Use it to understand the company’s direction instead. In this case, the direction is obvious: bigger batteries are becoming the new status symbol, especially in mid-range phones where people are tired of charging compromises.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For reference, if you want to compare Xiaomi’s claims against the broader ecosystem, it helps to look at Qualcomm’s Snapdragon pages at \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.qualcomm.com\u002Fproducts\u002Fmobile\u002Fsnapdragon\">qualcomm.com\u003C\u002Fa>, MediaTek’s Dimensity lineup at \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.mediatek.com\u002Fproducts\u002Fsmartphones\">mediatek.com\u003C\u002Fa>, and Corning’s Gorilla Glass materials at \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.corning.com\u002Fgorillaglass\u002Fworldwide\u002Fen.html\">corning.com\u003C\u002Fa>. Those are the kinds of sources that help you separate chip and durability marketing from the actual device story.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Pricing is where the whole thing either works or collapses\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Xiaomi’s official China pricing gives the base Redmi Note 17 a starting price of CNY 1,299 and the Pro at CNY 1,599. The Gadgeteer notes that the Pro Max has not been officially priced yet. That’s the only part of the story that really matters now, because the battery and camera numbers only become meaningful if Xiaomi keeps the price in range.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the Redmi Note 17 series lives or dies on value math. If the global pricing lands too high, the whole “big battery mid-range” pitch gets awkward fast. If Xiaomi keeps the spread sensible, the lineup could be very hard to ignore, especially in markets where battery life is a daily pain point and power banks are a permanent accessory.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve watched too many phones get praised in launch coverage and then quietly disappear because the global price turned them into bad deals. That’s why I don’t get too excited until I see regional pricing. Chinese launch pricing is real, but it is not the same thing as the number your local market will pay after taxes, logistics, and whatever regional markup gets stapled on top.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: always convert a launch story into three questions. What is the home-market price? What is the likely global price band? And what competing phones does that put it against? If Xiaomi keeps the Redmi Note 17 Pro near true mid-range money, it has a shot. If not, the battery story starts losing force.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For readers who want the original source context, the launch coverage is on \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fthe-gadgeteer.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fredmi-note-17-series\u002F\">The Gadgeteer\u003C\u002Fa>. Xiaomi’s own product pages and regional announcements are the only places I’d trust for final availability, especially outside China.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>How I’d actually choose between the three models\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>If I were buying one of these, I’d ignore the hype order and rank them by pain solved. The base Redmi Note 17 is for people who want the cheapest path to absurd battery life. The Pro is for people who want a balanced phone that still feels overbuilt. The Pro Max, if it exists as leaked, is for the person who wants to stop thinking about charging almost entirely and doesn’t mind waiting for official confirmation.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the lineup is less about “best” and more about “which annoyance are you paying to remove.” That’s the cleanest way I know to read a phone family. It keeps you from chasing the wrong spec and helps you notice when a manufacturer is quietly solving a real problem instead of just stuffing in a bigger number.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’d personally start with the Pro because it looks like the least compromised option. The base model is probably the smarter budget buy, but the Pro adds enough battery, brightness, and camera muscle that it feels like the one Xiaomi expects people to keep for a long time. That matters more to me than a flashy top-tier rumor.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Buy the base model if battery life is your only priority.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Buy the Pro if you want the best balance of display, battery, and camera.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Wait on the Pro Max until Xiaomi confirms the full spec sheet.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># How I read a phone launch without getting fooled by the spec sheet\n\n## 1) Start with the pain point\n- What problem is this phone trying to remove?\n- Battery anxiety\n- Camera disappointment\n- Outdoor visibility\n- Charging speed\n\n## 2) Identify the headline spec\n- Battery capacity\n- Camera resolution\n- Display brightness\n- Charging wattage\n\n## 3) Check the supporting hardware\n- Chipset class\n- Display technology\n- Durability rating\n- Frame material\n- Storage and memory tier\n\n## 4) Separate confirmed facts from leaks\n- Confirmed: official brand announcement, product page, launch event\n- Unconfirmed: leak, rumor, report, render\n- Do not base a purchase on unconfirmed specs\n\n## 5) Translate the numbers into daily use\n- Bigger battery = fewer charging stops\n- Faster charging = shorter plug-in time\n- Brighter display = easier outdoor use\n- Better camera spec = more room for good processing\n\n## 6) Compare the middle model first\n- Base model = cheapest entry\n- Pro model = best balance\n- Top model = only worth it if the extra feature solves a real problem\n\n## 7) Ask the one question that matters\n- Which annoyance am I paying to remove?\n\n## Copy-ready buying framework\n- If battery life is your top priority, rank battery capacity first.\n- If camera quality matters, check sensor size, processing, and storage behavior.\n- If you use the phone outdoors, prioritize brightness and glass protection.\n- If a top-tier model is still leaked, wait for official confirmation.\n- If the price rises too close to premium phones, compare it against flagship alternatives instead of assuming it is still mid-range.\n\n## Quick verdict template\n- Best for endurance: [model]\n- Best balance: [model]\n- Best value: [model]\n- Wait for confirmation: [leaked model]\n\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>The framework above is mine, but the facts it reacts to come from The Gadgeteer’s Redmi Note 17 series coverage. I’m using their reporting as the source and turning it into a practical decision template you can reuse on any phone launch.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Source: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fthe-gadgeteer.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fredmi-note-17-series\u002F\">https:\u002F\u002Fthe-gadgeteer.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fredmi-note-17-series\u002F\u003C\u002Fa>. Everything about the Redmi Note 17 lineup, battery claims, camera specs, and pricing in this piece is derived from that article, with my own analysis layered on top.\u003C\u002Fp>","I break down Xiaomi’s Redmi Note 17 lineup and turn the specs into a copy-ready buying framework.","the-gadgeteer.com","https:\u002F\u002Fthe-gadgeteer.com\u002F2026\u002F07\u002F14\u002Fredmi-note-17-series\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784138630965-83b5.png","tools","en","10ad3ee2-3f02-479a-8c97-afa911c02a28",[17,18,19,20,21],"Redmi Note 17","Xiaomi","battery life","mid-range phones","camera specs",[23,24,25],"The Redmi Note 17 series is built around battery life first, not thinness or raw performance.","The Pro model looks like the real sweet spot because it pairs a huge battery with stronger cameras and display specs.","The leaked Pro Max should be treated as direction, not fact, until Xiaomi confirms the final sheet.",0,"2026-07-15T18:03:19.453561+00:00","2026-07-15T18:03:19.438+00:00","3f0c9412-cb8d-47ac-bd47-5780ddffb336",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":32,"relatedPosts":36},[],{"id":15,"slug":33,"title":34,"language":35},"redmi-note-17-battery-camera-price-breakdown-zh","Redmi Note 17 把電量變主角","zh",[37,43,49,55,61,67],{"id":38,"slug":39,"title":40,"cover_image":41,"image_url":41,"created_at":42,"category":13},"6f7ab80c-abc0-4a66-90a8-52755a624481","databricks-query-foundation-models-guide-en","Databricks lets you query foundation models","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784144058128-58rk.png","2026-07-15T19:33:45.40417+00:00",{"id":44,"slug":45,"title":46,"cover_image":47,"image_url":47,"created_at":48,"category":13},"1a0db5c8-1638-496a-82c2-3c8953ac207a","sglang-inference-is-the-product-en","SGLang is winning because inference is the product","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784140363231-i2js.png","2026-07-15T18:32:19.539863+00:00",{"id":50,"slug":51,"title":52,"cover_image":53,"image_url":53,"created_at":54,"category":13},"be61d518-74a6-4482-986f-cd0d3bcae472","github-copilot-sdk-lets-apps-run-agents-en","GitHub Copilot SDK lets apps run agents","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784122406117-28v5.png","2026-07-15T13:32:56.664571+00:00",{"id":56,"slug":57,"title":58,"cover_image":59,"image_url":59,"created_at":60,"category":13},"60938346-4517-4a62-a8c0-ca6db24ed5d6","foundry-ship-agents-without-rewrites-en","Foundry lets you ship agents without rewrites","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784120662308-flld.png","2026-07-15T13:03:49.567537+00:00",{"id":62,"slug":63,"title":64,"cover_image":65,"image_url":65,"created_at":66,"category":13},"b821ec63-b837-4634-99f0-3b359d3c892f","kimi-k26-turns-prompt-into-brand-sites-en","Kimi K2.6 turns a prompt into brand sites","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784053990583-sulp.png","2026-07-14T18:32:49.279795+00:00",{"id":68,"slug":69,"title":70,"cover_image":71,"image_url":71,"created_at":72,"category":13},"4d4694ff-c317-4c1b-8564-4c310ca8d41b","cloudflare-one-partner-program-ai-security-rollout-en","Cloudflare One partner program speeds AI security rollout","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1784037810533-69nw.png","2026-07-14T14:02:57.550961+00:00",[74,79,84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119],{"id":75,"slug":76,"title":77,"created_at":78},"8008f1a9-7a00-4bad-88c9-3eedc9c6b4b1","surepath-ai-mcp-policy-controls-en","SurePath AI's New MCP Policy Controls Enhance AI Security","2026-03-26T01:26:52.222015+00:00",{"id":80,"slug":81,"title":82,"created_at":83},"27e39a8f-b65d-4f7b-a875-859e2b210156","mcp-standard-ai-tools-2026-en","MCP Standard in 2026: Integrating AI Tools","2026-03-26T01:27:43.127519+00:00",{"id":85,"slug":86,"title":87,"created_at":88},"165f9a19-c92d-46ba-b3f0-7125f662921d","rag-2026-transforming-enterprise-ai-en","How RAG in 2026 is Transforming Enterprise AI","2026-03-26T01:28:11.485236+00:00",{"id":90,"slug":91,"title":92,"created_at":93},"6a2a8e6e-b956-49d8-be12-cc47bdc132b2","mastering-ai-prompts-2026-guide-en","Mastering AI Prompts: A 2026 Guide for Developers","2026-03-26T01:29:07.835148+00:00",{"id":95,"slug":96,"title":97,"created_at":98},"3ab2c67e-4664-4c67-a013-687a2f605814","garry-tan-open-sources-claude-code-toolkit-en","Garry Tan Open-Sources a Claude Code Toolkit","2026-03-26T08:26:20.245934+00:00",{"id":100,"slug":101,"title":102,"created_at":103},"66a7cbf8-7e76-41d4-9bbf-eaca9761bf69","github-ai-projects-to-watch-in-2026-en","20 GitHub AI Projects to Watch in 2026","2026-03-26T08:28:09.752027+00:00",{"id":105,"slug":106,"title":107,"created_at":108},"9f332fda-eace-448a-a292-2283951eee71","practical-github-guide-learning-ml-2026-en","A Practical GitHub Guide to Learning ML in 2026","2026-03-27T01:16:50.125678+00:00",{"id":110,"slug":111,"title":112,"created_at":113},"1b1f637d-0f4d-42bd-974b-07b53829144d","aiml-2026-student-ai-ml-lab-repo-review-en","AIML-2026 Is a Bare-Bones Student Lab Repo","2026-03-27T01:21:51.661231+00:00",{"id":115,"slug":116,"title":117,"created_at":118},"6d1bf3f6-e191-4d30-b55b-8a0722fa6afe","ai-trending-github-repos-and-research-feeds-en","AI Trending Tracks Repos and Research Feeds","2026-03-27T01:31:35.709532+00:00",{"id":120,"slug":121,"title":122,"created_at":123},"010539a1-4c3a-4bd3-937a-26616422ee0d","awesome-ai-for-science-research-tools-map-en","Awesome AI for Science Is Becoming a Real Research Map","2026-03-27T01:46:50.89513+00:00"]