[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-zhihe-a210-riscv-soc-dev-kit-breakdown-en":3,"article-related-zhihe-a210-riscv-soc-dev-kit-breakdown-en":30,"series-tools-236310a3-50e1-4125-90ba-e876091ec809":75},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"236310a3-50e1-4125-90ba-e876091ec809","zhihe-a210-riscv-soc-dev-kit-breakdown-en","Zhihe A210 turns RISC-V into a dev kit","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">I break down the Zhihe A210 docs, the A210 SODIMM V2 board, and the SDK bits you can actually use.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I've been watching \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Frisc-v\">RISC-V\u003C\u002Fa> boards for a while now, and honestly, a lot of them feel like the same song in a different key. Big spec sheet, shiny AI number, a board photo, then a pile of missing docs that makes you wonder whether anyone actually tried to boot the thing outside the lab. The Zhihe A210 was in that bucket for me. I kept seeing the name float around, but there wasn't enough concrete hardware info to do anything useful with it. So the whole thing sat in that annoying middle zone: interesting enough to track, not useful enough to plan around.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That changed when CNX Software published the A210 documentation and the A210 SODIMM V2 development kit details. Now there’s enough on the table to stop guessing and start evaluating. I can look at the CPU clusters, the NPU, the board layout, the SDK, and the usual gotchas that matter when you’re deciding whether a board is a weekend toy or something you can actually build on. The source that kicked this off is Jean-Luc Aufranc’s write-up on \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cnx-software.com\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F17\u002Fzhihe-a210-octa-core-risc-v-soc-with-12-tops-npu-powers-som-based-development-board\u002F\">CNX Software\u003C\u002Fa>, and that matters because this is one of those posts where the documentation is the real story, not the marketing slide.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>What I found useful here is not just the chip itself. It’s the shape of the platform around it: a SoM on a carrier, real SDK instructions, video and AI notes, and a board layout that looks like someone expected developers to plug in displays, cameras, storage, and networking without fighting the hardware every five minutes. That’s the part I care about.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The A210 is trying to be a real platform, not a spec dump\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Zhihe A210 specifications: Octa-core RISC-V RV64GCV processor... 12 TOPS (INT8) neural processing unit... Linux SDK with buildroot and Debian images.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Zhihe is not just shipping a chip and hoping people fill in the blanks. The A210 is being presented as a platform: SoC, SoM, carrier board, SDK, and deployment docs. That matters because most dev boards fail at the handoff between silicon and software. The chip may be fine. The board may even be decent. But if the SDK is half-baked, you end up spending your time reverse-engineering the vendor’s intentions instead of building your own thing.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782905601305-w630.png\" alt=\"Zhihe A210 turns RISC-V into a dev kit\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>The CPU split is also telling. You get four C920 cores up to 2.3 GHz and four C908 cores up to 1.9 GHz, all 64-bit RISC-V. That’s a pretty clear “big cluster plus smaller cluster” setup, which is exactly the sort of thing I’d expect from a chip that wants to do mixed workloads without burning power on every background task. The docs also mention RVA23 compliance in one place, then CNX notes a correction in the comments. That kind of inconsistency is annoying, but it’s also normal in early documentation. I don’t ignore it; I treat it as a warning label.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve been burned by this kind of thing before. A board looks polished in the announcement, then the first thing you discover is that the kernel tree, the boot flow, and the SDK examples all belong to different realities. So when I see Linux SDK, Buildroot, Debian images, and \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fdocker\">Docker\u003C\u002Fa>-based startup instructions in the same package, I stop being cynical for a second. That’s at least evidence that someone expected developers to do more than stare at a power LED.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if you’re evaluating a new RISC-V board, don’t start with TOPS or peak GHz. Start with the platform shape. Ask: is there a SoM, a carrier, an SDK, a flashing path, and enough docs to move from boot to app without spelunking through forums for three days?\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The CPU split tells me what workloads the board is for\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>4x 64-bit RISC-V C920 cores @ up to 2.3 GHz... 4x 64-bit RISC-V C908 cores @ up to 1.9 GHz... 1 MB L2 cache... 512 KB L2 cache.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the A210 is built for a mixed-performance profile, not just raw \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fbenchmark\">benchmark\u003C\u002Fa> bragging. The bigger C920 cluster is where you’d expect heavier user-space work, while the C908 cluster likely handles lighter tasks or background services. That sort of arrangement can be useful in embedded Linux systems where you want responsiveness without wasting the whole chip on idle threads.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The cache sizes matter too. They’re not glamorous, but they tell you a lot about how the chip is intended to behave under load. A 1 MB L2 on one cluster and 512 KB on the other suggests the design is trying to balance throughput and efficiency rather than just throwing cores at the problem. If you’re used to Arm SoCs, this will feel familiar. If you’re newer to RISC-V, it’s worth noticing that the ecosystem is starting to look less like “experimental CPU” and more like “actual product architecture.”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I ran into the same pattern while testing other embedded Linux boards: the CPU specs only become meaningful once you map them to real tasks. A browser kiosk, a camera pipeline, a local \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Finference\">inference\u003C\u002Fa> app, and a storage-heavy service all stress the chip differently. On paper, the A210 looks like it could handle a respectable mix of those, but I’d still want to see thermal behavior, scheduler tuning, and mainline kernel support before I got too comfortable.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: match the CPU layout to your workload. If you’re building a media box, AI edge node, or multi-service gateway, the split-core design is useful. If you just need a tiny controller with Linux on top, this is probably overkill and more expensive than it needs to be.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Check whether the vendor documents core clustering and power management clearly.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Look for kernel patches or BSP notes that explain CPU frequency scaling.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Ask whether the smaller cluster can actually keep background services responsive under load.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The NPU is the part everyone will talk about, and I’d still read the fine print\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>12 TOPS (INT8) neural processing unit with supports for INT4, INT8, INT16, FP8, FP16 and BF16... DeepSeek-7B can reach 8 tokens\u002Fs; “4-die multi-chip cascading DeepSeek-7B can reach 25 tokens\u002Fs”.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the A210 is being positioned as an edge AI chip, not just a general-purpose SoC with a \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Ftoken\">token\u003C\u002Fa> NPU attached for marketing. Twelve TOPS is enough to get attention, but I care more about the software path than the headline number. The support list is broad: INT4 through BF16, plus TensorFlow, Caffe, HuggingFace, and ONNX. That tells me the vendor wants to cover both older model pipelines and the current wave of transformer deployment.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782905601059-gg9h.png\" alt=\"Zhihe A210 turns RISC-V into a dev kit\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>Still, I’m immediately suspicious of any AI number that’s presented without a lot of context. “DeepSeek-7B can reach 8 tokens\u002Fs” sounds useful until you ask the obvious questions: at what precision, with what memory setup, with what batching, and under what thermal limits? The “4-die multi-chip cascading” claim is even more of a systems question than a chip question. It may be real, but it’s not the number I’d use to decide whether a single board is useful.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I’ve seen this movie before with edge AI parts. The demo works, the model converts, the benchmark runs, and then your actual application has a different input size, a different pre\u002Fpost-processing chain, and a different latency budget. Suddenly the “12 TOPS” doesn’t translate into anything you can ship. So yes, the NPU matters. But the tooling matters more.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: treat the NPU as a deployment target, not a promise. Before you buy in, check for model conversion docs, runtime examples, quantization support, and whether the vendor’s SDK explains failure modes instead of just showing a happy-path demo.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Verify ONNX import and export paths with one of your own models.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Look for sample code that includes preprocessing and postprocessing, not just inference calls.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Confirm whether the runtime supports your precision target without a hidden fallback to CPU.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>The multimedia block is more practical than the AI headline\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Up to 4Kp120 H.265\u002FHEVC, H.264\u002FAVC, AV1... HDMI 1.4\u002F2.0 up to 4Kp60... 4-lane MIPI DSI... DisplayPort up to 4Kp60... 4-lane MIPI CSI2 D-PHY interface.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the A210 is not just trying to be an inference box. It’s trying to be a proper embedded media platform. Video decode support up to 4Kp120 for several codecs, plus encode at 4Kp60 for H.265 and H.264, is the sort of thing that makes a board useful for kiosks, cameras, signage, and local processing appliances.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This is where I usually get more interested than I do in AI claims. A board with good video plumbing can be used in a lot of boring, profitable ways. And boring is good. If you can get HDMI, DSI, CSI, and DP into the same design, you can prototype a camera-to-display pipeline, a monitoring system, or a compact multimedia appliance without bolting on half a dozen adapters.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The board docs also mention flexible camera lane configurations and a 12 MP ISP. That combination tells me the vendor expects camera-heavy use cases, not just desktop-style dev work. If I were planning an actual product, I’d want to know whether the ISP pipeline is documented well enough to avoid weird color, exposure, or frame-drop issues. Vendor camera stacks love to be fragile.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: if your project needs video in, video out, or both, read this section before the AI section. Media support often determines whether a board is genuinely useful. The inference engine can be great, but if the display path is flaky or the camera stack is a mess, you’ll hate your life anyway.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The SoM and carrier board layout is the part I’d actually build around\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>A210 SODIMM V2 board specifications: 260-pin SO-DIMM edge connector... 2x Gigabit Ethernet PHY... HDMI 2.0... DisplayPort via USB-C... Mini PCIe socket... M.2 Key-B SATA port... Wi-Fi and Bluetooth V5.0 \u002F4.2 support.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that the A210 isn’t being sold as a bare chip story. It’s a modular developer setup, and that’s the \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fdow-agent-network-military-ai-right-move-en\">right move\u003C\u002Fa>. The SoM hides the messy high-speed routing and memory integration, while the carrier board exposes the stuff that matters to developers: Ethernet, USB, display, camera, storage, and expansion.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>I like this approach because it lowers the number of ways you can accidentally ruin a prototype. High-speed DDR, SoC power rails, and dense BGA escape routing are the vendor’s problem. My problem is whether I can get a board into the lab, flash it, connect a display, and start poking at peripherals. The 260-pin SO-DIMM connector is a very familiar sign that the platform is meant to be reused.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The carrier board’s mix is sensible: dual Gigabit Ethernet, USB-C with DisplayPort Alt Mode, HDMI 2.0, CSI connectors, audio, Mini PCIe, and M.2 Key-B SATA. That’s a lot of options without feeling random. If the docs are decent, this board could be a solid base for gateways, media appliances, or AI edge prototypes that need more than one network port and one storage path.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: when you’re reading a board page, separate the SoM from the carrier. Ask what’s on the module, what’s on the carrier, and what’s left to your design. That’s the difference between a board you can extend and a board you can only admire.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The SDK is the difference between “interesting” and “usable”\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>The system-on-module and development board are supported by a Linux SDK with buildroot and Debian images... basic instructions to get started with the SDK using a Docker image.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>What this actually means is that Zhihe is trying to make the first boot less painful. I care a lot about this because the first hour with a board usually decides whether I keep going. If the vendor gives me a Docker-based SDK path, Buildroot, Debian images, and tutorials for multimedia and model deployment, I’m more willing to spend time on the hardware.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That doesn’t mean the software is good. It means the vendor understands that a board without a usable onboarding path is dead on arrival for most developers. I’ve lost count of how many boards looked promising until I had to assemble the toolchain, patch the kernel, and guess the flashing procedure from one screenshot and a forum reply. I’m too old for that nonsense.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The docs also mention TORQ-Toolkit for model conversion and deployment. That’s useful if it’s documented properly. If it isn’t, it becomes one more vendor-specific layer you need to work around. But the fact that they bothered to include it in the getting-started path suggests they’re trying to cover the full lifecycle, not just initial boot.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>How to apply it: before you buy, read the SDK docs like you’re going to use them immediately. If the install path, image build, flashing, and demo apps are all documented in a sane order, the board is probably worth your time. If the docs assume you already know the vendor’s internal process, walk away.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>One more practical note: CNX Software says the board is listed on AliExpress at $334.33 in an 8GB\u002F64GB configuration, but also notes that the seller often marks up the price. That’s the sort of detail I actually pay attention to. A chip is only part of the cost. The early-adopter tax is real, and it can turn a promising board into an expensive curiosity fast.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The template you can copy\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># RISC-V SoM evaluation template\n\n## What I’m checking\n- SoC architecture and core mix\n- NPU or accelerator claims\n- Video, camera, and display paths\n- Storage and networking options\n- SDK quality and first-boot path\n- Carrier board expansion options\n\n## Questions I ask before buying\n1. Is there a real SDK with build instructions?\n2. Are there Debian or Buildroot images I can flash immediately?\n3. Does the vendor document camera, display, and video encode\u002Fdecode paths?\n4. Can I verify NPU model conversion with my own model?\n5. Is the board modular, with a SoM and carrier, or is everything fixed?\n6. Are the docs specific enough to avoid forum archaeology?\n\n## My quick scoring rubric\n- Boot and flashing docs: \u002F5\n- SDK clarity: \u002F5\n- Linux support: \u002F5\n- Media pipeline usefulness: \u002F5\n- AI deployment practicality: \u002F5\n- Expansion and I\u002FO: \u002F5\n\n## Copy-paste board intake notes\n**Board name:** \n**Vendor:** \n**SoC:** \n**CPU cores:** \n**NPU\u002FTOPS:** \n**RAM options:** \n**Storage options:** \n**Display outputs:** \n**Camera inputs:** \n**Networking:** \n**USB\u002FPCIe\u002FM.2:** \n**SDK link:** \n**Kernel support:** \n**Known gaps:** \n**My verdict:** \n\n## What I want from the vendor\n- One clean getting-started guide\n- One flashing guide\n- One multimedia demo\n- One AI model conversion example\n- One peripheral reference table\n- One honest list of unsupported features\n\n## Decision rule\nIf the board has good docs, a sane SDK, and one or two real use cases I can name immediately, I keep it.\nIf the board only has a flashy spec sheet, I skip it.\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>My take on the A210 is simple: it finally looks like a RISC-V platform I could evaluate without inventing half the process myself. That’s a low bar, but in this market, it’s still worth something. The SoM form factor, the multimedia stack, the NPU, and the SDK path make it more than just another headline chip.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Source attribution: the original material is Jean-Luc Aufranc’s CNX Software post at \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cnx-software.com\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F17\u002Fzhihe-a210-octa-core-risc-v-soc-with-12-tops-npu-powers-som-based-development-board\u002F\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cnx-software.com\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F17\u002Fzhihe-a210-octa-core-risc-v-soc-with-12-tops-npu-powers-som-based-development-board\u002F\u003C\u002Fa>. I’ve broken it down and added my own developer-facing interpretation, but the hardware facts and quoted specs come from that source.\u003C\u002Fp>","I break down the Zhihe A210 docs, the A210 SODIMM V2 board, and the SDK bits you can actually use.","www.cnx-software.com","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cnx-software.com\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F17\u002Fzhihe-a210-octa-core-risc-v-soc-with-12-tops-npu-powers-som-based-development-board\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782905601305-w630.png","tools","en","2fb45a80-d9a5-4758-b2c1-3765e2fe63b1",[17,18,19,20,21],"RISC-V","SoM","edge AI","NPU","development board",[23,24,25],"The A210 matters because the docs finally make it evaluable, not just interesting.","The SoM plus carrier board setup is more useful than a bare-chip announcement.","The SDK and media pipeline will decide whether this board is practical.",1,"2026-07-01T11:32:58.099197+00:00","2026-07-01T11:32:58.085+00:00","a7343b93-37cc-4634-a2bc-707f6275bdb6",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":34,"relatedPosts":38},[32],{"name":17,"slug":33},"risc-v",{"id":15,"slug":35,"title":36,"language":37},"zhihe-a210-risc-v-soc-dev-kit-breakdown-zh","Zhihe A210 把 RISC-V 變成開發板","zh",[39,45,51,57,63,69],{"id":40,"slug":41,"title":42,"cover_image":43,"image_url":43,"created_at":44,"category":13},"c4ae7d55-663c-4ad6-846d-da941d934571","9-cursor-alternatives-that-beat-lock-in-en","9 Cursor alternatives that beat lock-in","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782914599832-agyf.png","2026-07-01T14:02:57.008648+00:00",{"id":46,"slug":47,"title":48,"cover_image":49,"image_url":49,"created_at":50,"category":13},"3c1791f8-1d25-4e81-b0ac-caa096636b77","ai-video-tools-full-pipeline-wins-en","AI视频生成工具的胜负手，已经不是单次生成而是全流程生产","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782912776582-364i.png","2026-07-01T13:32:24.270244+00:00",{"id":52,"slug":53,"title":54,"cover_image":55,"image_url":55,"created_at":56,"category":13},"60c9b34d-281c-48f1-a389-b30f95af74b9","go-makes-backend-scale-easier-in-production-en","Go makes backend scale easier in production","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782910120371-yueu.png","2026-07-01T12:48:17.148443+00:00",{"id":58,"slug":59,"title":60,"cover_image":61,"image_url":61,"created_at":62,"category":13},"870ef5aa-ccd4-49f6-88e8-7bf52f68577b","boot-dev-go-playground-teaching-tool-en","Boot.dev’s Go Playground is a better teaching tool than a full IDE","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782909173250-xa75.png","2026-07-01T12:32:25.122224+00:00",{"id":64,"slug":65,"title":66,"cover_image":67,"image_url":67,"created_at":68,"category":13},"78d52a1f-a6d7-437b-a937-2738422cd02c","meta-opens-astryx-agent-readable-ui-work-en","Meta opens Astryx for agent-readable UI work","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782894771028-3j1k.png","2026-07-01T08:32:28.240241+00:00",{"id":70,"slug":71,"title":72,"cover_image":73,"image_url":73,"created_at":74,"category":13},"03ce5f66-9735-4e9d-b40a-326e93de73a1","awesome-agent-memory-llm-memory-map-en","Awesome-Agent-Memory maps the field of LLM memory","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1782892092221-n17t.png","2026-07-01T07:47:40.463289+00:00",[76,81,86,91,96,101,106,111,116,121],{"id":77,"slug":78,"title":79,"created_at":80},"8008f1a9-7a00-4bad-88c9-3eedc9c6b4b1","surepath-ai-mcp-policy-controls-en","SurePath AI's New MCP Policy Controls Enhance AI Security","2026-03-26T01:26:52.222015+00:00",{"id":82,"slug":83,"title":84,"created_at":85},"27e39a8f-b65d-4f7b-a875-859e2b210156","mcp-standard-ai-tools-2026-en","MCP Standard in 2026: Integrating AI Tools","2026-03-26T01:27:43.127519+00:00",{"id":87,"slug":88,"title":89,"created_at":90},"165f9a19-c92d-46ba-b3f0-7125f662921d","rag-2026-transforming-enterprise-ai-en","How RAG in 2026 is Transforming Enterprise AI","2026-03-26T01:28:11.485236+00:00",{"id":92,"slug":93,"title":94,"created_at":95},"6a2a8e6e-b956-49d8-be12-cc47bdc132b2","mastering-ai-prompts-2026-guide-en","Mastering AI Prompts: A 2026 Guide for Developers","2026-03-26T01:29:07.835148+00:00",{"id":97,"slug":98,"title":99,"created_at":100},"3ab2c67e-4664-4c67-a013-687a2f605814","garry-tan-open-sources-claude-code-toolkit-en","Garry Tan Open-Sources a Claude Code Toolkit","2026-03-26T08:26:20.245934+00:00",{"id":102,"slug":103,"title":104,"created_at":105},"66a7cbf8-7e76-41d4-9bbf-eaca9761bf69","github-ai-projects-to-watch-in-2026-en","20 GitHub AI Projects to Watch in 2026","2026-03-26T08:28:09.752027+00:00",{"id":107,"slug":108,"title":109,"created_at":110},"9f332fda-eace-448a-a292-2283951eee71","practical-github-guide-learning-ml-2026-en","A Practical GitHub Guide to Learning ML in 2026","2026-03-27T01:16:50.125678+00:00",{"id":112,"slug":113,"title":114,"created_at":115},"1b1f637d-0f4d-42bd-974b-07b53829144d","aiml-2026-student-ai-ml-lab-repo-review-en","AIML-2026 Is a Bare-Bones Student Lab Repo","2026-03-27T01:21:51.661231+00:00",{"id":117,"slug":118,"title":119,"created_at":120},"6d1bf3f6-e191-4d30-b55b-8a0722fa6afe","ai-trending-github-repos-and-research-feeds-en","AI Trending Tracks Repos and Research Feeds","2026-03-27T01:31:35.709532+00:00",{"id":122,"slug":123,"title":124,"created_at":125},"010539a1-4c3a-4bd3-937a-26616422ee0d","awesome-ai-for-science-research-tools-map-en","Awesome AI for Science Is Becoming a Real Research Map","2026-03-27T01:46:50.89513+00:00"]