[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-gemma-4-vs-llama-4-scout":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":52,"winsA":62,"winsB":63,"relatedArticles":64,"otherComparisons":84},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"Gemma 4","Google","$0.00\u002F$0.00","Google’s latest open model family entry surfaced in 2026 benchmark roundups for self-hosted use.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"Llama 4 Scout","Meta","$0.08\u002F$0.3","10M context industry record; 109B MoE (17B active)",[15,19,25,30,34,37,41,44,48],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":23,"winner":24},"context","Context Window","128K","10M","b",{"key":26,"label":27,"valueA":28,"valueB":29,"winner":24},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","N\u002FA","$0.08",{"key":31,"label":32,"valueA":28,"valueB":33,"winner":24},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$0.3",{"key":35,"label":36,"valueA":28,"valueB":28,"winner":18},"arena","Arena ELO",{"key":38,"label":39,"valueA":28,"valueB":40,"winner":18},"coding","Coding","unknown",{"key":42,"label":43,"valueA":28,"valueB":40,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":45,"label":46,"valueA":28,"valueB":47,"winner":24},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)","~90 t\u002Fs",{"key":49,"label":50,"valueA":51,"valueB":51,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes",[53,56,59],{"question":54,"answer":55},"Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 or Llama 4 Scout?","Gemma 4 scores N\u002FA on coding benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout scores unknown.",{"question":57,"answer":58},"Which has a larger context window?","Gemma 4 supports 128K context, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M.",{"question":60,"answer":61},"Is Gemma 4 or Llama 4 Scout open source?","Gemma 4 is open source. Llama 4 Scout is open source.",0,4,[65,69,72,75,78,81],{"slug":66,"title":67,"language":68},"llama-cpp-vs-vllm-choosing-the-right-local-llm-engine-en","llama.cpp vs vLLM: Choosing the right local LLM engine","en",{"slug":70,"title":71,"language":68},"rootly-benchmark-llama-4-trails-coding-models-en","Rootly benchmark: Llama 4 trails coding models",{"slug":73,"title":74,"language":68},"diffusiongemma-transparency-measured-en","DiffusionGemma’s transparency problem, measured",{"slug":76,"title":77,"language":68},"gemma-4-256k-context-open-models-en","Gemma 4 brings 256K context to open models",{"slug":79,"title":80,"language":68},"llama-cpp-release-kernel-tuning-over-features-en","llama.cpp’s latest release proves the project still wins by tightenin…",{"slug":82,"title":83,"language":68},"ollama-default-local-ai-layer-en","Ollama is becoming the default local AI layer",[85,90,95,100,105,110,115,120],{"slugA":86,"labelA":87,"slugB":88,"labelB":89},"claude-opus-45-vs-gemma-4","Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":91,"labelA":92,"slugB":93,"labelB":94},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-gemma-4","Gemma 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":96,"labelA":97,"slugB":98,"labelB":99},"claude-haiku-45-vs-gemma-4","Gemma 4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":101,"labelA":102,"slugB":103,"labelB":104},"gemma-4-vs-glm-52","Gemma 4 vs GLM-5.2","glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs GLM-5.2",{"slugA":106,"labelA":107,"slugB":108,"labelB":109},"gemma-4-vs-qwen-36","Gemma 4 vs Qwen 3.6","llama-4-scout-vs-qwen-36","Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":111,"labelA":112,"slugB":113,"labelB":114},"gemma-4-vs-gpt-4o","Gemma 4 vs GPT-4o","gpt-4o-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4o",{"slugA":116,"labelA":117,"slugB":118,"labelB":119},"deepseek-r1-vs-gemma-4","Gemma 4 vs DeepSeek R1","deepseek-r1-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek R1",{"slugA":121,"labelA":122,"slugB":123,"labelB":124},"claude-opus-46-vs-gemma-4","Gemma 4 vs Claude Opus 4.6","claude-opus-46-vs-llama-4-scout","Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.6"]