[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-kimi-k2":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":55,"winsA":68,"winsB":69,"relatedArticles":70,"otherComparisons":90},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$3\u002F$80","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"Kimi K2","Moonshot","$0.55\u002F$2.2","1T params; Agent Swarm (100 agents); Modified MIT",[15,19,23,29,34,39,43,47,51],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":22,"winner":18},"context","Context Window","128K",{"key":24,"label":25,"valueA":26,"valueB":27,"winner":28},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$3","$0.55","b",{"key":30,"label":31,"valueA":32,"valueB":33,"winner":28},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$80","$2.2",{"key":35,"label":36,"valueA":37,"valueB":38,"winner":28},"arena","Arena ELO","N\u002FA","1380",{"key":40,"label":41,"valueA":37,"valueB":42,"winner":18},"coding","Coding","65.8% SWE-bench",{"key":44,"label":45,"valueA":37,"valueB":46,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning","60.2% BrowseComp",{"key":48,"label":49,"valueA":37,"valueB":50,"winner":28},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)","~50 t\u002Fs",{"key":52,"label":53,"valueA":54,"valueB":54,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes",[56,59,62,65],{"question":57,"answer":58},"Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2?","Kimi K2 is approximately 97% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.",{"question":60,"answer":61},"Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2?","GLM-5.2 scores N\u002FA on coding benchmarks, while Kimi K2 scores 65.8% SWE-bench.",{"question":63,"answer":64},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Kimi K2 supports 128K.",{"question":66,"answer":67},"Is GLM-5.2 or Kimi K2 open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. Kimi K2 is open source.",0,4,[71,75,78,81,84,87],{"slug":72,"title":73,"language":74},"glm-5-2-open-source-1m-context-long-tasks-en","GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务","en",{"slug":76,"title":77,"language":74},"kimi-k2-6-turns-agents-into-a-swarm-en","Kimi K2.6 turns agents into a swarm",{"slug":79,"title":80,"language":74},"moonshot-ai-kimi-models-growth-en","Moonshot AI’s Kimi models are getting bigger fast",{"slug":82,"title":83,"language":74},"kimi-k27-code-highspeed-mode-skips-benchmarks-en","Kimi K2.7-Code Adds HighSpeed Mode, Skips Benchmarks",{"slug":85,"title":86,"language":74},"kimi-k27-whats-new-and-how-to-run-it-en","Kimi K2.7: What Changed and How to Run It",{"slug":88,"title":89,"language":74},"kimi-k2-7-code-api-kimi-code-first-en","Kimi K2.7 Code 该优先上 API 和 Kimi Code，而不是等生态成熟",[91,96,101,106,111,116,121,126],{"slugA":92,"labelA":93,"slugB":94,"labelB":95},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-kimi-k2","Kimi K2 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":97,"labelA":98,"slugB":99,"labelB":100},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","kimi-k2-vs-llama-4-scout","Kimi K2 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":102,"labelA":103,"slugB":104,"labelB":105},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-kimi-k2","Kimi K2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":107,"labelA":108,"slugB":109,"labelB":110},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-kimi-k2","Kimi K2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":112,"labelA":113,"slugB":114,"labelB":115},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","kimi-k2-vs-qwen-36","Kimi K2 vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":117,"labelA":118,"slugB":119,"labelB":120},"glm-52-vs-gpt-4o","GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o","gpt-4o-vs-kimi-k2","Kimi K2 vs GPT-4o",{"slugA":122,"labelA":123,"slugB":124,"labelB":125},"deepseek-r1-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1","deepseek-r1-vs-kimi-k2","Kimi K2 vs DeepSeek R1",{"slugA":127,"labelA":128,"slugB":129,"labelB":130},"claude-opus-46-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6","claude-opus-46-vs-kimi-k2","Kimi K2 vs Claude Opus 4.6"]