[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-glm-52-vs-minimax-h3":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":51,"winsA":58,"winsB":59,"relatedArticles":60,"otherComparisons":80},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GLM-5.2","Z.ai","$1.40\u002F$4.40","Open-weights coding-focused model released in June 2026, positioned for long-horizon autonomous engineering tasks.",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"MiniMax H3","MiniMax","$0.00\u002F$0.00","An omni-modal video model that generates 15-second 2K clips with native stereo audio from text, image, video, and audio context.",[15,19,25,30,34,37,40,43,46],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":23,"winner":24},"context","Context Window","128K","uncertain","a",{"key":26,"label":27,"valueA":28,"valueB":29,"winner":24},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$1.4","N\u002FA",{"key":31,"label":32,"valueA":33,"valueB":29,"winner":24},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$4.4",{"key":35,"label":36,"valueA":29,"valueB":29,"winner":18},"arena","Arena ELO",{"key":38,"label":39,"valueA":29,"valueB":29,"winner":18},"coding","Coding",{"key":41,"label":42,"valueA":29,"valueB":29,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning",{"key":44,"label":45,"valueA":29,"valueB":29,"winner":18},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)",{"key":47,"label":48,"valueA":49,"valueB":50,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","Yes","No",[52,55],{"question":53,"answer":54},"Which has a larger context window?","GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while MiniMax H3 supports uncertain.",{"question":56,"answer":57},"Is GLM-5.2 or MiniMax H3 open source?","GLM-5.2 is open source. MiniMax H3 is proprietary.",3,0,[61,65,68,71,74,77],{"slug":62,"title":63,"language":64},"kimi-k3-vs-glm-5-2-one-endpoint-test-en","Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2: a one-endpoint test","en",{"slug":66,"title":67,"language":64},"omlx-045-dev1-glm52-minimax-m3-speedups-en","oMLX 0.4.5.dev1 speeds up GLM-5.2 and MiniMax M3",{"slug":69,"title":70,"language":64},"glm-5-2-tops-open-rankings-huawei-chips-en","GLM-5.2 tops open AI rankings on Huawei chips",{"slug":72,"title":73,"language":64},"glm-52-beats-gpt-55-coding-benchmarks-en","GLM-5.2 beats GPT-5.5 on coding tests",{"slug":75,"title":76,"language":64},"minimax-lockup-expiry-stress-test-not-red-flag-en","MiniMax’s lockup expiry is a stress test, not a red flag",{"slug":78,"title":79,"language":64},"deploy-minimax-m3-with-vllm-openai-api-en","Deploy MiniMax M3 with vLLM OpenAI API",[81,86,91,96,101,106,111,116],{"slugA":82,"labelA":83,"slugB":84,"labelB":85},"claude-opus-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":87,"labelA":88,"slugB":89,"labelB":90},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-scout","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout","llama-4-scout-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":92,"labelA":93,"slugB":94,"labelB":95},"claude-haiku-45-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":97,"labelA":98,"slugB":99,"labelB":100},"glm-52-vs-qwen-36","GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6","minimax-h3-vs-qwen-36","MiniMax H3 vs Qwen 3.6",{"slugA":102,"labelA":103,"slugB":104,"labelB":105},"glm-52-vs-kimi-k27-code","GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 Code","kimi-k27-code-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code",{"slugA":107,"labelA":108,"slugB":109,"labelB":110},"glm-52-vs-llama-4-maverick","GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick","llama-4-maverick-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs Llama 4 Maverick",{"slugA":112,"labelA":113,"slugB":114,"labelB":115},"glm-52-vs-gpt-53-codex","GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.3-Codex","gpt-53-codex-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs GPT-5.3-Codex",{"slugA":117,"labelA":118,"slugB":119,"labelB":120},"gemma-4-vs-glm-52","GLM-5.2 vs Gemma 4","gemma-4-vs-minimax-h3","MiniMax H3 vs Gemma 4"]