[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"compare-gpt-4o-vs-minimax-m3":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":9,"categories":14,"faq":56,"winsA":66,"winsB":67,"relatedArticles":68,"otherComparisons":88},{"name":5,"provider":6,"pricing":7,"highlights":8},"GPT-4o","OpenAI","$2.5\u002F$10","Legacy but still available; superseded by GPT-5 family",{"name":10,"provider":11,"pricing":12,"highlights":13},"MiniMax M3","MiniMax",null,"Open-weight multimodal model with a one-million-token context window and strong coding performance.",[15,19,25,31,35,39,43,47,51],{"key":16,"label":17,"valueA":6,"valueB":11,"winner":18},"provider","Provider","tie",{"key":20,"label":21,"valueA":22,"valueB":23,"winner":24},"context","Context Window","128K","1M","b",{"key":26,"label":27,"valueA":28,"valueB":29,"winner":30},"pricingInput","Input Price ($\u002F1M)","$2.5","N\u002FA","a",{"key":32,"label":33,"valueA":34,"valueB":29,"winner":30},"pricingOutput","Output Price ($\u002F1M)","$10",{"key":36,"label":37,"valueA":38,"valueB":29,"winner":30},"arena","Arena ELO","1285",{"key":40,"label":41,"valueA":42,"valueB":29,"winner":18},"coding","Coding","30.8% SWE-bench",{"key":44,"label":45,"valueA":46,"valueB":29,"winner":18},"reasoning","Reasoning","unknown",{"key":48,"label":49,"valueA":50,"valueB":29,"winner":30},"speed","Speed (tokens\u002Fsec)","~100 t\u002Fs",{"key":52,"label":53,"valueA":54,"valueB":55,"winner":18},"openSource","Open Source","No","Yes",[57,60,63],{"question":58,"answer":59},"Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or MiniMax M3?","GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while MiniMax M3 scores N\u002FA.",{"question":61,"answer":62},"Which has a larger context window?","GPT-4o supports 128K context, while MiniMax M3 supports 1M.",{"question":64,"answer":65},"Is GPT-4o or MiniMax M3 open source?","GPT-4o is proprietary. MiniMax M3 is open source.",4,1,[69,73,76,79,82,85],{"slug":70,"title":71,"language":72},"minimax-m3-open-weight-coding-win-en","MiniMax M3 Proves Open-Weight Can Still Win on Coding","en",{"slug":74,"title":75,"language":72},"minimax-m3-triple-capability-open-model-en","MiniMax M3: 中国首个三合一开源模型",{"slug":77,"title":78,"language":72},"why-minimax-m3-matters-long-context-model-en","Why MiniMax M3 matters more than another long-context model",{"slug":80,"title":81,"language":72},"minimax-m3-engineer-workflow-agent-en","MiniMax M3 让工程师工作流更像代理",{"slug":83,"title":84,"language":72},"7-minimax-models-for-agentic-apps-en","7 MiniMax models for agentic apps",{"slug":86,"title":87,"language":72},"minimax-m27-turns-agents-into-shipped-work-en","MiniMax M2.7 turns agents into shipped work",[89,94,99,104,109,114,119,124],{"slugA":90,"labelA":91,"slugB":92,"labelB":93},"claude-opus-45-vs-gpt-4o","GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5","claude-opus-45-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs Claude Opus 4.5",{"slugA":95,"labelA":96,"slugB":97,"labelB":98},"gpt-4o-vs-llama-4-scout","GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout","llama-4-scout-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs Llama 4 Scout",{"slugA":100,"labelA":101,"slugB":102,"labelB":103},"claude-sonnet-46-vs-gpt-4o","GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6","claude-sonnet-46-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6",{"slugA":105,"labelA":106,"slugB":107,"labelB":108},"claude-haiku-45-vs-gpt-4o","GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5","claude-haiku-45-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5",{"slugA":110,"labelA":111,"slugB":112,"labelB":113},"claude-opus-46-vs-gpt-4o","GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.6","claude-opus-46-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs Claude Opus 4.6",{"slugA":115,"labelA":116,"slugB":117,"labelB":118},"deepseek-r1-vs-gpt-4o","GPT-4o vs DeepSeek R1","deepseek-r1-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek R1",{"slugA":120,"labelA":121,"slugB":122,"labelB":123},"deepseek-v32-vs-gpt-4o","GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V3.2","deepseek-v32-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V3.2",{"slugA":125,"labelA":126,"slugB":127,"labelB":128},"gpt-4o-vs-llama-4-maverick","GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Maverick","llama-4-maverick-vs-minimax-m3","MiniMax M3 vs Llama 4 Maverick"]