[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-abra-turns-tokenization-into-crypto-banking-play-zh":3,"article-related-abra-turns-tokenization-into-crypto-banking-play-zh":30,"series-blockchain-cbb3e634-3cf7-4dc7-beaf-89bdd3d90112":81},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"content":7,"summary":8,"source":9,"source_url":10,"author":11,"image_url":12,"cover_image":12,"category":13,"language":14,"translated_content":11,"related_article_id":15,"keywords":16,"key_takeaways":22,"views":26,"created_at":27,"published_at":28,"topic_cluster_id":29},"cbb3e634-3cf7-4dc7-beaf-89bdd3d90112","abra-turns-tokenization-into-crypto-banking-play-zh","Abra 把代幣化做成銀行模板","\u003Cp data-speakable=\"summary\">我拆 Abra 怎麼把\u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fus-banks-tokenized-deposit-network-2027-zh\">代幣化\u003C\u002Fa>、收益、借貸串成一個像銀行的 crypto 模板，最後給你可直接套用的產品框架。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我看 crypto 產品看久了，最怕那種只會講幣價的團隊。比特幣漲了說自己厲害，跌了就改口說長期主義，反正永遠有話講，但產品本身沒長進。我也看過太多平台把「Earn」塞進去就當策略，像是把壞掉的結帳頁面擦乾淨，然後跟我說這叫升級。Abra 這次的說法讓我停下來，是因為它不是在賣另一個交易 App，而是在講一個更像銀行的東西：資產上鏈、變流動、拿去當抵押品，再把收益和借貸包進同一套流程裡。這種思路對真的在做金融產品的人，才有用。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>這份拆解的觸發來源是 \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.coindesk.com\u002Fbusiness\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F07\u002Fabra-s-bill-barhydt-says-wall-street-s-next-crypto-bet-is-tokenization\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CoinDesk 對 Abra CEO Bill Barhydt 的專訪\u003C\u002Fa>。原文沒提供觀看數或書籤數，我就不亂掰。它真正丟出來的，是一個很清楚的判斷：Abra 想做的是 tokenization 與 wealth management 平台，而且 Barhydt 認為大家盯著 bitcoin 價格，反而看小了真正重要的事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>他不是在賣 crypto，他是在賣一個銀行式介面\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>\"Crypto should function like a bank.\"\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>這句話我覺得是整篇的起手式。不是「crypto 應該更像賭場」，也不是「crypto 應該更像看盤\u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fopen-source-dev-tools-2026-zh\">工具\u003C\u002Fa>」，而是銀行。這代表使用者心裡期待的不是一個幣價儀表板，而是一個可以存、可以借、可以賺、可以轉、可以拿去做抵押的金融工具箱。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780894096891-1o06.png\" alt=\"Abra 把代幣化做成銀行模板\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>白話翻譯就是：Abra 想把自己做成一個數位資產的金融作業系統，不是單純的交易所。原文提到它讓客戶在同一個平台上交易、賺收益、借款、付款，也在 Abra Financial Holdings 底下往 tokenization 和 wealth management 擴張，服務對象包含 advisory 與 institutional clients。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我以前做過一個資產管理流程，最常見的問題不是功能不夠，而是流程太像內部組織圖。使用者想借錢，結果要先切到另一個頁面；想拿資產去做收益，又要重新理解一套名詞；想把 collateral 移動一下，還得猜系統到底把它放在哪個帳本。這種設計很煩，因為它要求使用者先理解公司內部怎麼分工，再來理解產品。誰有空陪你演這齣。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>實操寫法很簡單：不要先用部門切功能，要用使用者意圖切功能。第一層不是「我們有什麼 feature」，而是「使用者手上的資產現在能做什麼」。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>持有\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>賺收益\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>借出\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>轉移\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>作為抵押品\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>這個列表看起來很土，但土才對。金融產品最怕炫技，最有用的通常是清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>代幣化只有在把死資產變成活資本時才有意義\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>\"Everything is becoming tokenized and liquid via DeFi.\"\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>這裡我覺得 Barhydt 終於講到重點了。代幣化本身不是目的。你把一個資產包成 \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Ftoken\">token\u003C\u002Fa>，不代表世界突然變好；如果那個 token 沒人能用，它就只是比較好看的資料庫欄位。真正值錢的是：資產能不能更容易移動、能不能更容易被拿去當抵押、能不能因此生出新的融資或收益路徑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>也就是說，tokenization 的商業價值不在「上鏈」這個動作，而在「上鏈之後，資產可以幹嘛」。這個差別很重要。對機構來說，他們在乎的是 collateral efficiency、settlement speed、asset mobility，不是你今天用了哪條鏈。你如果跟財務長講「我們很 \u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fweb3\">Web3\u003C\u002Fa>」，他大概只會想把會議結束掉。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我之前看過一些 tokenized asset demo，畫面很漂亮，講 provenance、講透明度、講不可竄改，台上聽起來都很完整。結果我一問：這東西怎麼融資？怎麼拿去借？怎麼在資產負債表上\u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnews\u002Fciti-tokenization-forecast-turns-markets-onchain-zh\">變成可\u003C\u002Fa>運用的東西？現場就開始安靜。這就是問題。很多團隊只把 tokenization 當展示層，沒把它當資本效率工具。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>實操寫法：你在評估一個 tokenization 方案時，先問三件事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>這個資產會不會更好移動？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>能不能更容易拿去當 collateral？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>有沒有新的收益或融資方式？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>三題都答不出來，那多半是 demo，不是產品。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>收益是入口，不是口號\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>原文提到 Abra 計畫推出 BTCAF，一個有收益的 bitcoin 產品，接在 tokenized dollar 產品 USDAF 的需求之後。\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>這段我看得很直接：Abra 不是在喊「tokenization 很重要」這種空話，它是在做能賣出去的產品。USDAF 是現在的例子，BTCAF 是下一步。你可以把它理解成：先用 tokenized dollar 讓人摸到門，再用 bitcoin-based yield product 把需求接住。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780894095939-xm6m.png\" alt=\"Abra 把代幣化做成銀行模板\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>白話翻譯就是，使用者不會因為「tokenized wrapper」這幾個字掏錢，但他會因為「這筆閒資金可以開始生收益」而停下來看。收益是使用者看得懂的結果，tokenization 是背後的機制，lending 才是底下的引擎。這三層如果順序搞反，你就會開始對外講一堆基礎設施語言，然後沒人買單。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我看過不少 crypto 團隊很愛跟使用者炫耀架構，講 composability、講 settlement、講 protocol design，像是希望市場對你工程團隊鼓掌。問題是市場不會為架構鼓掌，市場只會為回報、風險、流動性和可近性買單。Abra 這次比較像是把「你的 token 能做什麼」放在前面，而不是「我們的鏈有多漂亮」。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>實操寫法：做收益產品時，先把使用者承諾寫成白話，再去補 smart contract。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>哪個資產在賺？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>收益從哪裡來？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>有沒有鎖倉或流動性限制？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>誰可以用？\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>如果這四個問題答不清楚，先別急著上線。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>借貸才是 crypto 有沒有認真做金融的試金石\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>Abra already allows clients to borrow against bitcoin, ether and solana holdings.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>借貸是整個故事裡最誠實的部分。因為借貸不吃口號，它只吃風控。你說資產有價值是一回事，真的有人願意拿它當抵押、願意放款、願意接受清算規則，那又是另一回事。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Barhydt 說 Abra 正在重點擴張 lending 能力，我覺得這很合理。只要 tokenized asset 可以被拿去當 collateral，借貸就會變成連接 crypto balance sheet 和傳統金融行為的橋。你有資產，拿去借；你拿到現金流，再去做別的事。這才是金融，不是喊話。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我會喜歡這一段，是因為借貸會逼產品長大。它不允許你只講夢想，因為你得回答 liquidation threshold、margin call、誰承擔 downside、系統多久反應這些很煩但很重要的問題。這些問題一出來，很多「\u003Ca href=\"\u002Ftag\u002Fdefi\">DeFi\u003C\u002Fa>-powered」產品就會原形畢露。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>實操寫法：把借貸當成風險產品，不是成長產品。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>清楚顯示 collateral ratio\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>用一句話講完 liquidation trigger\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>還款條件要一眼看懂\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>把促銷文案和風險揭露分開\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>如果你把機制藏起來，等於叫使用者相信感覺。這不是金融，這是賭運氣。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>Wall Street 其實不缺幣價故事，它缺的是資本效率語言\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>In his view, the ability to tokenize assets and make them liquid, transferable and usable as collateral through decentralized finance is a far more consequential development than debates over exchange-traded funds or short-term market cycles.\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>這段是整篇最有策略味的一刀。Barhydt 的意思很明白：重點不是 bitcoin 每週漲跌多少，也不是 ETF 討論有多熱鬧，而是能不能把資產變成可流動、可轉移、可抵押的東西。對機構來說，這才像能放進會議室的語言。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>翻譯一下就是，tokenization 讓 crypto 終於可以用金融界聽得懂的詞說話，而不是一直扮演某種技術圈自嗨。collateral、liquidity、distribution，這些詞本來就是金融的。crypto 如果能對上這些詞，它就不是旁門左道，而是另一種基礎設施。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我自己最受不了那種只會談價格週期的產品會議。交易員聊這個很正常，但如果你是在做產品、做機構銷售、做風控，整天圍著 K 線轉，只會讓事情變窄。真正能撐住的敘事，是 utility，不是情緒。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>實操寫法：把你的對外說法從「去中心化未來」改成可驗證的結果。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>更快的 settlement\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>更高的 collateral efficiency\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>更廣的 distribution\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>可程式化的資產移動\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>這種話雖然不性感，但比較像能過合規會議的東西。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>要上市不是為了面子，是為了把自己放進規則裡\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cblockquote>原文提到，這筆交易在 3 月宣布，估值 7.5 億美元，合併後公司會改名為 Abra Financial Inc.，並計畫在 Nasdaq 以 ABRX 掛牌，前提是監管核准。\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>我把這段看成訊號，不只是融資。公開上市不是單純拿錢，它也在告訴市場：我想被當成金融公司看，不是那種靠敘事撐場面的 crypto 新創。這很重要，因為一旦你想談 wealth management，你的公司結構、監管態度、分銷方式就不能再像隨便做個 App 那樣亂來。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>白話翻譯就是，Abra 想把自己的公司外殼，做成跟它的產品敘事一致的樣子。這樣做的好處是，機構比較知道怎麼看你；壞處是，你會被更嚴格地檢查。老實說，這很合理。你要賣金融產品，就別想只享受科技公司的自由，卻不承擔金融公司的責任。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>我以前看過太多團隊把 entity structure 當成法務收尾工作，等到產品快上線才發現監管路徑不對，整個規劃直接歪掉。這種事很常見，也很蠢。金融產品從來不是先有 UI 再補合規，順序反了就會死得很難看。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>實操寫法：如果你也在做金融或 crypto 產品，先把這幾件事寫清楚。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>你的法人架構\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>你的監管姿態\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>你的分銷對象\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>你的產品能在哪些司法管轄區運作\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>這些不是附錄，這些是產品的一部分。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>可抄的模板\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cpre>\u003Ccode># Onchain wealth management playbook for a crypto-finance product\n\n## Positioning\nWe are not building a generic crypto app.\nWe are building a platform where users can:\n- hold assets\n- earn yield\n- borrow against collateral\n- move assets across accounts\n- access tokenized products\n\n## Core thesis\nTokenization matters only when it makes assets:\n- liquid\n- transferable\n- usable as collateral\n- productive through lending or yield\n\n## Product structure\n1. Asset custody\n2. Tokenized product issuance\n3. Yield generation\n4. Collateralized lending\n5. Distribution to advisory, institutional, and retail users where allowed\n\n## User promise\nTurn idle assets into working capital without making the user manage five different products.\n\n## Messaging\nUse finance language, not crypto jargon.\n\n### Good\n- improve collateral efficiency\n- unlock liquidity\n- simplify access to yield\n- support asset-backed borrowing\n\n### Bad\n- revolutionary ecosystem\n- next-gen token rails\n- seamless Web3 experience\n- cutting-edge financial paradigm\n\n## Build checklist\n- [ ] Define the asset type\n- [ ] Define the yield source\n- [ ] Define the collateral rules\n- [ ] Define liquidation triggers\n- [ ] Define who can access the product\n- [ ] Define how the token moves\n- [ ] Define how the product is distributed\n- [ ] Define the regulatory wrapper\n\n## One-sentence pitch\nWe turn tokenized assets into usable collateral and yield-bearing financial products.\n\n## Landing page copy\nHeadline: Turn digital assets into productive capital.\nSubhead: Earn, borrow, and move tokenized assets through one financial platform.\nCTA: See available products\n\n## Risk disclosure block\nAll yield products involve risk. Collateral values can fall. Borrowers may be liquidated. Access depends on jurisdiction and investor status.\n\n## Internal review questions\n- Would a lender understand this in 30 seconds?\n- Would a compliance team know what we do?\n- Would a user know how they make money?\n- Would a risk team know where the downside sits?\n\n## Launch rule\nIf the product story depends on bitcoin price going up, it is not a durable product story.\n\u003C\u002Fcode>\u003C\u002Fpre>\u003Cp>這段就是我會直接丟給團隊的版本。它不花俏，但它會逼你回答真正該回答的問題：資產是什麼、收益從哪來、抵押規則是什麼、誰能用、風險在哪。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>原始來源是 CoinDesk 這篇：\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.coindesk.com\u002Fbusiness\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F07\u002Fabra-s-bill-barhydt-says-wall-street-s-next-crypto-bet-is-tokenization\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\u002F\u002Fwww.coindesk.com\u002Fbusiness\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F07\u002Fabra-s-bill-barhydt-says-wall-street-s-next-crypto-bet-is-tokenization\u003C\u002Fa>。我這篇的拆解、框架和模板是原創；引文、產品細節和公司敘事則來自原文。","我拆 Abra 怎麼把代幣化、收益、借貸串成一個像銀行的 crypto 模板，最後給你可直接套用的產品框架。","www.coindesk.com","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.coindesk.com\u002Fbusiness\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F07\u002Fabra-s-bill-barhydt-says-wall-street-s-next-crypto-bet-is-tokenization",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780894096891-1o06.png","blockchain","zh","34073b5a-a8b5-4d53-af4e-e7cc1c787525",[17,18,19,20,21],"tokenization","yield","collateralized lending","wealth management","crypto banking",[23,24,25],"代幣化只有在讓資產變得可流動、可抵押、可生收益時才有價值。","Abra 的敘事重點不是幣價，而是把 crypto 做成像銀行一樣的金融介面。","如果你也在做金融產品，先把收益來源、抵押規則和監管包裝寫清楚，再談產品。",1,"2026-06-08T04:47:51.403064+00:00","2026-06-08T04:47:51.379+00:00","1534679b-7605-4ede-a072-791c912656e7",{"tags":31,"relatedLang":40,"relatedPosts":44},[32,34,35,36,38],{"name":19,"slug":33},"collateralized-lending",{"name":18,"slug":18},{"name":17,"slug":17},{"name":20,"slug":37},"wealth-management",{"name":21,"slug":39},"crypto-banking",{"id":15,"slug":41,"title":42,"language":43},"abra-turns-tokenization-into-crypto-banking-play-en","Abra turns tokenization into a crypto banking play","en",[45,51,57,63,69,75],{"id":46,"slug":47,"title":48,"cover_image":49,"image_url":49,"created_at":50,"category":13},"783081bf-049d-42bf-b5f1-79710b99955e","us-banks-tokenized-deposit-network-2027-zh","4 大美銀擬建代幣化存款網路","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780892276347-ixva.png","2026-06-08T04:17:24.453531+00:00",{"id":52,"slug":53,"title":54,"cover_image":55,"image_url":55,"created_at":56,"category":13},"cbb09427-de23-42a8-ae1d-7387f8cfadc7","secs-peirce-questions-defi-developer-liability-zh","Peirce 質疑 DeFi 開發者責任","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780860774195-j7qj.png","2026-06-07T19:32:25.342556+00:00",{"id":58,"slug":59,"title":60,"cover_image":61,"image_url":61,"created_at":62,"category":13},"e03026a3-7ff2-459d-9d80-fa8fabcb58bb","cayman-crypto-rules-2026-web3-founder-guide-zh","Cayman 2026：Web3 創辦人合規指南","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780854476771-rin8.png","2026-06-07T17:47:24.386022+00:00",{"id":64,"slug":65,"title":66,"cover_image":67,"image_url":67,"created_at":68,"category":13},"5f1390ac-1ee6-465b-84d9-98e1b1a906f1","why-nft-game-studios-stop-issuing-stablecoins-zh","為什麼 NFT 遊戲工作室應該停止發行自己的穩定幣","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780852674698-o7rj.png","2026-06-07T17:17:24.031301+00:00",{"id":70,"slug":71,"title":72,"cover_image":73,"image_url":73,"created_at":74,"category":13},"019eb8ae-0051-42e5-9dd8-89d027547fe0","casper-ai-toolkit-live-x402-payments-zh","Casper 推 AI 工具包，x402 付款上主網","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780810369602-r132.png","2026-06-07T05:32:22.899783+00:00",{"id":76,"slug":77,"title":78,"cover_image":79,"image_url":79,"created_at":80,"category":13},"d6768cdb-e43c-4b70-b015-dca026ebd1de","how-to-buy-linea-assets-on-bitget-wallet-zh","5 分鐘在 Bitget Wallet 買入 Linea 資產","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1780746470651-trap.png","2026-06-06T11:47:23.216233+00:00",[82,87,92,97,102,107,112,117,122,127],{"id":83,"slug":84,"title":85,"created_at":86},"e1b4b518-f86b-410c-8c82-8cfb787ff2ef","moonpay-open-wallet-standard-ai-payments-zh","MoonPay 推 OWS，瞄準 AI 付款","2026-03-28T03:08:33.379969+00:00",{"id":88,"slug":89,"title":90,"created_at":91},"e72bae29-ddbd-437b-aaa4-cd662605394b","next-gen-crypto-simulators-ai-web3-training-zh","新一代加密模擬器更聰明了","2026-04-01T09:36:33.917023+00:00",{"id":93,"slug":94,"title":95,"created_at":96},"b8e39b58-6b9d-4714-92d3-26df18a3e0f4","rtk-cuts-claude-code-token-spend-zh","RTK 讓 Claude Code 少燒 Token","2026-04-01T10:24:29.259497+00:00",{"id":98,"slug":99,"title":100,"created_at":101},"7ff10146-4ca0-4670-a02c-384dde04f610","trm-labs-ai-agents-crypto-investigations-zh","TRM Labs 將 AI agent 帶進加密調查","2026-04-01T10:33:30.166266+00:00",{"id":103,"slug":104,"title":105,"created_at":106},"00668dea-9f0e-4019-b861-03817d5a8877","how-web3-marketing-changed-in-2026-zh","2026 Web3 行銷怎麼變了","2026-04-02T01:36:34.973322+00:00",{"id":108,"slug":109,"title":110,"created_at":111},"e7992274-42ee-40bc-bb05-97250098c56c","ai-agentic-defi-web3-grants-march-2026-zh","AI、Agentic DeFi 與 Web3 補助案","2026-04-02T05:51:36.857954+00:00",{"id":113,"slug":114,"title":115,"created_at":116},"5cef810b-af3d-467a-8b41-627769eca895","why-crypto-is-fixated-on-ai-agents-zh","為何加密圈盯上 AI Agent","2026-04-02T05:54:28.919864+00:00",{"id":118,"slug":119,"title":120,"created_at":121},"d30e6203-d522-41a1-b529-fcf4499cd985","web3-explained-what-it-is-why-it-matters-zh","Web3 是什麼，為何重要","2026-04-02T06:15:32.580114+00:00",{"id":123,"slug":124,"title":125,"created_at":126},"f29e65ae-64df-463b-ba22-afd9dcbd0f8f","trust-wallet-agent-kit-ai-trade-25-chains-zh","Trust Wallet 讓 AI 幫你交易","2026-04-02T06:27:33.183404+00:00",{"id":128,"slug":129,"title":130,"created_at":131},"91022b4c-b53e-4c18-abfe-914a8eca6e28","blockchain-in-ai-real-use-cases-zh","區塊鏈加 AI，真實落地在哪裡","2026-04-02T06:30:44.026286+00:00"]