Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6
Claude Opus 4.5 leads in 3 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.5
Cheaper
Qwen 3.6
Faster
Claude Opus 4.5
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.5 | Qwen 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 200K WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $0.2 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $0.8 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1380 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 80.9% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | unknown | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~35 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen 3.6?
Qwen 3.6 is approximately 97% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen 3.6?
Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3.6 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen 3.6 open source?
Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary. Qwen 3.6 is open source.
Related Articles
91 Anthropic GitHub repos showcase Claude Code push
Claude Design turns assets into a team design system
Claude vs GPT vs Gemini: Coding Benchmark Leaderboard
Claude Partner Program turns Anthropic into a channel
Anthropic pushes Claude deeper into enterprise data
Three multimodal models now work in Claude Code
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-4oClaude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3.2Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3.6 vs GPT-4oQwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2