GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6
Both models are evenly matched
Arena ELO
GPT-4o
Cheaper
Qwen 3.6
Faster
GPT-4o
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GPT-4o | Qwen 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $2.5 | $0.2 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 | $0.8 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1285 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 30.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | unknown | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~100 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Qwen 3.6?
Qwen 3.6 is approximately 92% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or Qwen 3.6?
GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3.6 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
GPT-4o supports 128K context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.
Is GPT-4o or Qwen 3.6 open source?
GPT-4o is proprietary. Qwen 3.6 is open source.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs GLM-5.2GPT-4o vs DeepSeek R1GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.6GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V3.2Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2