GPT-4o vs LongCat-2.0
GPT-4o leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
GPT-4o
Cheaper
GPT-4o
Faster
GPT-4o
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GPT-4o | LongCat-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meituan |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $2.5 WIN | N/A |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $10 WIN | N/A |
| Arena ELO | 1340 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 30.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | unknown | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~100 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or LongCat-2.0?
GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while LongCat-2.0 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
GPT-4o supports 128K context, while LongCat-2.0 supports 128K.
Is GPT-4o or LongCat-2.0 open source?
GPT-4o is proprietary. LongCat-2.0 is open source.
More Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs Claude Fable 5GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4 FlashLongCat-2.0 vs Claude Opus 4.5LongCat-2.0 vs Llama 4 ScoutLongCat-2.0 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6LongCat-2.0 vs Claude Haiku 4.5LongCat-2.0 vs Qwen 3.6LongCat-2.0 vs Claude Fable 5LongCat-2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeLongCat-2.0 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash