Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4-Pro

Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 5 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.6

Cheaper

Claude Opus 4.6

Faster

Claude Opus 4.6

Detailed Comparison

Category	Claude Opus 4.6	DeepSeek V4-Pro
Provider	Anthropic	DeepSeek
Context Window	1M WIN	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$5 WIN	N/A
Output Price ($/1M)	$25 WIN	N/A
Arena ELO	1549 WIN	N/A
Coding	80.8% SWE-bench	N/A
Reasoning	65.4% Terminal-Bench	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~40 t/s WIN	N/A
Open Source	No	No

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while DeepSeek V4-Pro scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while DeepSeek V4-Pro supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V4-Pro open source?

Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. DeepSeek V4-Pro is proprietary.

Related Articles

Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6

Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters

Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools

Claude Reflect turns usage into retention

Claude Code’s backdoor scare points to 4 real risks

Anthropic’s Claude Skills define the new agent toolkit

More Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 Scout Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6 Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Fable 5 DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code DeepSeek V4-Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash