Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B leads in 3 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper
Qwen 3 235B
Faster
Qwen 3 235B
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $0.86 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $2 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1549 WIN | 1422 |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s | ~65 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is approximately 90% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen 3 235B?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen 3 235B open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher with ELO 1549 vs 1422.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3 235B vs Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash