← All Models

Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2 leads in 3 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.7

Cheaper

DeepSeek V3.2

Faster

DeepSeek V3.2

Detailed Comparison

CategoryClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V3.2
ProviderAnthropic DeepSeek
Context Window128K 128K
Input Price ($/1M)N/A $0.27 WIN
Output Price ($/1M)N/A $1.1 WIN
Arena ELO1567 WIN1380
CodingN/A unknown
ReasoningN/A unknown
Speed (tokens/sec)N/A ~80 t/s WIN
Open SourceNo Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V3.2?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 128K context, while DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V3.2 open source?

Claude Opus 4.7 is proprietary. DeepSeek V3.2 is open source.

Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?

Claude Opus 4.7 ranks higher with ELO 1567 vs 1380.

Related Articles

Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6

Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters

Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools

Claude Reflect turns usage into retention

Claude Code’s backdoor scare points to 4 real risks

Anthropic’s Claude Skills define the new agent toolkit

More Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Fable 5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash