Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Cheaper
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Faster
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $3 | $0.1 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $15 | $0.4 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1440 | 1492 WIN |
| Coding | 79.6% SWE-bench | unknown |
| Reasoning | 72.5% OSWorld | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~80 t/s | ~200 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is approximately 97% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 79.6% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1M context, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports 1M.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite open source?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is proprietary. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks higher with ELO 1492 vs 1440.
Related Articles
Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6
Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters
Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Claude Reflect turns usage into retention