DeepSeek V4-Pro vs GLM-5.2
GLM-5.2 leads in 2 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Tie
Cheaper
GLM-5.2
Faster
Tie
Detailed Comparison
| Category | DeepSeek V4-Pro | GLM-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | N/A | $3 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | N/A | $80 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | N/A |
| Coding | N/A | N/A |
| Reasoning | N/A | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | N/A |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V4-Pro supports 128K context, while GLM-5.2 supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V4-Pro or GLM-5.2 open source?
DeepSeek V4-Pro is proprietary. GLM-5.2 is open source.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4-Pro vs GPT-4oDeepSeek V4-Pro vs DeepSeek R1DeepSeek V4-Pro vs Claude Opus 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutGLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4oGLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6