GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout leads in 4 of 8 categories

Arena ELO

Tie

Cheaper

Llama 4 Scout

Faster

Llama 4 Scout

Detailed Comparison

Category	GLM-5.2	Llama 4 Scout
Provider	Z.ai	Meta
Context Window	128K	10M WIN
Input Price ($/1M)	$3	$0.08 WIN
Output Price ($/1M)	$80	$0.3 WIN
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	unknown
Reasoning	N/A	unknown
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	~90 t/s WIN
Open Source	Yes	Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is approximately 100% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout?

GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout scores unknown.

Which has a larger context window?

GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M.

Is GLM-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout open source?

GLM-5.2 is open source. Llama 4 Scout is open source.

Related Articles

llama.cpp vs vLLM: Choosing the right local LLM engine

Rootly benchmark: Llama 4 trails coding models

GLM-5.2开源：1M上下文冲刺长程任务

llama.cpp’s latest release proves the project still wins by tightenin…

GLM-5.2把前沿模型变成可用工具

Ollama is becoming the default local AI layer

More Comparisons

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6 GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4o GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6 GLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek V3.2 Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.5 Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 3.6 Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4o Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek R1 Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.6 Llama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V3.2