GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Tie
Cheaper
Llama 4 Scout
Faster
Llama 4 Scout
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GLM-5.2 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | Meta |
| Context Window | 128K | 10M WIN |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $1.4 | $0.08 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $4.4 | $0.3 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | N/A |
| Coding | N/A | unknown |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~90 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is approximately 93% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout?
GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Llama 4 Scout scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M.
Is GLM-5.2 or Llama 4 Scout open source?
GLM-5.2 is open source. Llama 4 Scout is open source.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGLM-5.2 vs MiniMax H3GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickGLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.3-CodexGLM-5.2 vs Gemma 4Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4.5Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen 3.6Llama 4 Scout vs Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax H3Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-5.3-CodexLlama 4 Scout vs Gemma 4