GLM-5.2 vs o3
o3 leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
o3
Cheaper
GLM-5.2
Faster
o3
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GLM-5.2 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 128K | 200K WIN |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $3 WIN | $10 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $80 | $40 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1422 WIN |
| Coding | N/A | unknown |
| Reasoning | N/A | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~30 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or o3?
o3 is approximately 40% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or o3?
GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while o3 scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while o3 supports 200K.
Is GLM-5.2 or o3 open source?
GLM-5.2 is open source. o3 is proprietary.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutGLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4oGLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6o3 vs Claude Opus 4.5o3 vs Llama 4 Scouto3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6o3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5o3 vs Qwen 3.6o3 vs GPT-4oo3 vs DeepSeek R1o3 vs Claude Opus 4.6