GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3 235B
Qwen 3 235B leads in 4 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
Cheaper
Qwen 3 235B
Faster
Qwen 3 235B
Detailed Comparison
| Category | GLM-5.2 | Qwen 3 235B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $3 | $0.86 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $80 | $2 WIN |
| Arena ELO | N/A | 1422 WIN |
| Coding | N/A | 70.7% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | N/A | 2056 CodeForces ELO |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~65 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3 235B?
Qwen 3 235B is approximately 97% cheaper than GLM-5.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3 235B?
GLM-5.2 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
GLM-5.2 supports 128K context, while Qwen 3 235B supports 128K.
Is GLM-5.2 or Qwen 3 235B open source?
GLM-5.2 is open source. Qwen 3 235B is open source.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutGLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-5.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Qwen 3.6GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4oGLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek R1GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6Qwen 3 235B vs GPT-4oQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.6