Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 在 5 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
價格較低
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
速度較快
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
詳細比較
| 類別 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 200K | 1M 勝出 |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.8 | $0.1 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $4 | $0.4 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1290 | 1492 勝出 |
| Coding | unknown | unknown |
| Reasoning | unknown | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~120 t/s | ~200 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | No | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is approximately 90% cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K context, while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite supports 1M.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite open source?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks higher with ELO 1492 vs 1290.
相關文章
Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6
Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters
Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Claude Reflect turns usage into retention