Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 在 4 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.5
價格較低
Gemini 2.5 Pro
速度較快
Gemini 2.5 Pro
詳細比較
| 類別 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 200K | 1M 勝出 |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $1.25 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $10 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1380 勝出 | 1360 |
| Coding | 80.9% SWE-bench | 75.6% LiveCodeBench |
| Reasoning | unknown | 84.6% GPQA Diamond |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~35 t/s | ~60 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | No | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is approximately 63% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 75.6% LiveCodeBench.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K context, while Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro open source?
Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary. Gemini 2.5 Pro is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Claude Opus 4.5 ranks higher with ELO 1380 vs 1360.
相關文章
Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6
Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters
Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Claude Reflect turns usage into retention