← 全部模型

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Claude Opus 4.5 在 5 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.5

價格較低

Claude Opus 4.5

速度較快

Claude Opus 4.5

詳細比較

類別	Claude Opus 4.5	GPT-5.6 Terra
Provider	Anthropic	OpenAI
Context Window	200K 勝出	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$5 勝出	N/A
Output Price ($/1M)	$25 勝出	N/A
Arena ELO	1380 勝出	N/A
Coding	80.9% SWE-bench	N/A
Reasoning	unknown	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~35 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	No	No

常見問題

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores 80.9% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while GPT-5.6 Terra scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K context, while GPT-5.6 Terra supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra open source?

Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary. GPT-5.6 Terra is proprietary.

相關文章

Anthropic’s California deal makes Claude the default public-sector AI

Claude Sonnet 4.6 narrows the SRE gap

GLM 5.2 beats Claude in Semgrep’s IDOR test

Claude Code turns agent setup into terminal work

Anthropic Accuses Alibaba of Massive Claude Distillation

OpenAI narrows GPT-5.6 rollout after U.S. request

更多比較

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6 Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash GPT-5.6 Terra vs Llama 4 Scout GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-5.6 Terra vs GLM-5.2 GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen 3.6 GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Fable 5 GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K2.7 Code GPT-5.6 Terra vs DeepSeek V4 Flash