Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
價格較低
Gemini 2.5 Flash
速度較快
Gemini 2.5 Flash
詳細比較
| 類別 | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $0.3 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $2.5 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1549 勝出 | 1362 |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | unknown |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s | ~150 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | No | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is approximately 91% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Flash open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. Gemini 2.5 Flash is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher with ELO 1549 vs 1362.
相關文章
Anthropic extends Claude Fable access after GPT-5.6
Claude's J-space is not consciousness, but it matters
Claude Code MCP setup that connects real tools
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Claude Reflect turns usage into retention