Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-Codex
Claude Opus 4.6 在 3 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
價格較低
GPT-5.3-Codex
速度較快
Claude Opus 4.6
詳細比較
| 類別 | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.3-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 1M 勝出 | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $1.75 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $14 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1549 勝出 | N/A |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s 勝出 | N/A |
| Open Source | No | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.3-Codex?
GPT-5.3-Codex is approximately 48% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.3-Codex?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while GPT-5.3-Codex scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while GPT-5.3-Codex supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.3-Codex open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. GPT-5.3-Codex is proprietary.
相關文章
91 Anthropic GitHub repos showcase Claude Code push
Claude Design turns assets into a team design system
Claude vs GPT vs Gemini: Coding Benchmark Leaderboard
Claude Partner Program turns Anthropic into a channel
Anthropic pushes Claude deeper into enterprise data
Three multimodal models now work in Claude Code
更多比較
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4oClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R1GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.3-Codex vs GLM-5.2GPT-5.3-Codex vs Qwen 3.6GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-4oGPT-5.3-Codex vs DeepSeek R1