← 全部模型

Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

Claude Opus 4.8

價格較低

DeepSeek V4 Flash

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderAnthropic DeepSeek
Context Window200K 勝出128K
Input Price ($/1M)$5 $0.14 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)$25 $0.28 勝出
Arena ELO1580 勝出N/A
CodingN/A N/A
ReasoningN/A N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)N/A N/A
Open SourceNo Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is approximately 99% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 supports 200K context, while DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 128K.

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or DeepSeek V4 Flash open source?

Claude Opus 4.8 is proprietary. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open source.

相關文章

Windows Codex and Claude Code fixes that work

DeepSeek V4 Flash turns Agent work cheap

DeepSeek V4 Flash Is Repricing the Post-Coding-Plan Era

Try Claude Opus 4.7 and read its benchmarks

Claude’s security test became a real breach

Claude’s 2026 limit changes are a capacity story, not a product story

更多比較

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax H3Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 4 MaverickClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.3-CodexDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax H3DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.3-Codex