DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 在 4 / 8 個類別領先
Arena ELO
Gemini 2.5 Flash
價格較低
Gemini 2.5 Flash
速度較快
Gemini 2.5 Flash
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Context Window | 128K | 1M 勝出 |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.55 | $0.3 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $2.19 勝出 | $2.5 |
| Arena ELO | 1310 | 1362 勝出 |
| Coding | unknown | unknown |
| Reasoning | #1 Math & Coding Arena | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~45 t/s | ~150 t/s 勝出 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
DeepSeek R1 is approximately 2% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores unknown.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M.
Is DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash open source?
DeepSeek R1 is open source. Gemini 2.5 Flash is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher with ELO 1362 vs 1310.
相關文章
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
DeepSeek’s low-cost chatbot changed AI pricing