← 全部模型

DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 3.2 Flash

DeepSeek R1 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

DeepSeek R1

價格較低

DeepSeek R1

速度較快

DeepSeek R1

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek R1	Gemini 3.2 Flash
Provider	DeepSeek	Google
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$0.55 勝出	N/A
Output Price ($/1M)	$2.19 勝出	N/A
Arena ELO	1310 勝出	N/A
Coding	unknown	N/A
Reasoning	#1 Math & Coding Arena	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~45 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	Yes	No

常見問題

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 3.2 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Gemini 3.2 Flash scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while Gemini 3.2 Flash supports 128K.

Is DeepSeek R1 or Gemini 3.2 Flash open source?

DeepSeek R1 is open source. Gemini 3.2 Flash is proprietary.

相關文章

Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…

Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap

Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line

Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move

Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use

DeepSeek’s low-cost chatbot changed AI pricing

更多比較

DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Fable 5 DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Qwen 3.6 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Claude Fable 5 Gemini 3.2 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code Gemini 3.2 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash