← 全部模型

DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K3

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

DeepSeek R1

價格較低

Kimi K3

速度較快

DeepSeek R1

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek R1	Kimi K3
Provider	DeepSeek	Moonshot AI
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	N/A	$0.6 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	N/A	$2.5 勝出
Arena ELO	1310 勝出	N/A
Coding	unknown	N/A
Reasoning	#1 Math & Coding Arena	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~45 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	Yes	Yes

常見問題

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek R1 or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek R1 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Kimi K3 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek R1 supports 128K context, while Kimi K3 supports 128K.

Is DeepSeek R1 or Kimi K3 open source?

DeepSeek R1 is open source. Kimi K3 is open source.

相關文章

Kimi K3 Benchmark Evaluation Guide for Coding Agents

Kimi K3 Proves Intelligence Still Costs Too Much

Kimi K3 could pressure the middle tier of AI models

Kimi K3 turns model hype into harness work

Kimi API quickstart adds K2.7 Code and Highspeed

Kimi K2.6 turns a prompt into brand sites

更多比較

DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek R1 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 DeepSeek R1 vs Claude Fable 5 Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Kimi K3 vs Llama 4 Scout Kimi K3 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.6 Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5