DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
兩個模型整體表現接近
Arena ELO
DeepSeek V3.2
價格較低
DeepSeek V4 Flash
速度較快
DeepSeek V3.2
詳細比較
| 類別 | DeepSeek V3.2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.27 | $0.14 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $1.1 | $0.28 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1380 勝出 | N/A |
| Coding | unknown | N/A |
| Reasoning | unknown | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~80 t/s 勝出 | N/A |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is approximately 69% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while DeepSeek V4 Flash scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 128K.
Is DeepSeek V3.2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash open source?
DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open source.
相關文章
DeepSeek V4 Flash turns Agent work cheap
DeepSeek V4 Flash Is Repricing the Post-Coding-Plan Era
DeepSeek’s low-cost chatbot changed AI pricing
5 steps to connect Codex with DeepSeek
Why Claude Code Should Use DeepSeek v4 for 1M Context
Why DeepSeek V4 plus Claude Code is the wrong way to judge coding mod…
更多比較
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax H3DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.3-CodexDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax H3DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.3-Codex