← 全部模型

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Grok 4.6

DeepSeek V3.2 在 4 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

DeepSeek V3.2

價格較低

DeepSeek V3.2

速度較快

DeepSeek V3.2

詳細比較

類別DeepSeek V3.2Grok 4.6
ProviderDeepSeek xAI
Context Window128K 500K 勝出
Input Price ($/1M)$0.27 勝出$2
Output Price ($/1M)$1.1 勝出$6
Arena ELO1380 勝出N/A
Codingunknown N/A
Reasoningunknown N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)~80 t/s 勝出N/A
Open SourceYes No

常見問題

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V3.2 is approximately 83% cheaper than Grok 4.6 per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.2 or Grok 4.6?

DeepSeek V3.2 scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while Grok 4.6 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V3.2 supports 128K context, while Grok 4.6 supports 500K.

Is DeepSeek V3.2 or Grok 4.6 open source?

DeepSeek V3.2 is open source. Grok 4.6 is proprietary.

相關文章

Grok 4.6 makes frontier AI cheaper for builders

Grok 4.6 matches top models as SpaceX eyes worker data

Grok 4.6 puts frontier IQ on a budget

DeepSeek’s plugin harness turns agents into tools

Grok Bot turns browser chores into cloud work

OpenCode now supports DeepSeek, GLM, Qwen, GPT

更多比較

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 ScoutDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen 3.6DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeDeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax H3DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Grok 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutGrok 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Grok 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGrok 4.6 vs MiniMax H3Grok 4.6 vs Llama 4 MaverickGrok 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-Codex