← 全部模型

DeepSeek V4 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

DeepSeek V4 在 2 / 8 個類別領先

Arena ELO

平手

價格較低

DeepSeek V4

速度較快

平手

詳細比較

類別	DeepSeek V4	Kimi K2.7 Code
Provider	DeepSeek	Moonshot AI
Context Window	128K	256K 勝出
Input Price ($/1M)	$0.14 勝出	$0.6
Output Price ($/1M)	$0.28 勝出	$2.4
Arena ELO	N/A	N/A
Coding	N/A	N/A
Reasoning	N/A	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	N/A	N/A
Open Source	Yes	No

常見問題

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

DeepSeek V4 is approximately 86% cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4 supports 128K context, while Kimi K2.7 Code supports 256K.

Is DeepSeek V4 or Kimi K2.7 Code open source?

DeepSeek V4 is open source. Kimi K2.7 Code is proprietary.

相關文章

OpenAI’s distillation playbook explains the Kimi panic

Kimi K3 Is Forcing Silicon Valley to Pick Sides

Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2: a one-endpoint test

Kimi K3 handles an 820k-line Rust codebase

Kimi K3 Benchmark Evaluation Guide for Coding Agents

Kimi K3 Proves Intelligence Still Costs Too Much

更多比較

DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek V4 vs Llama 4 Scout DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek V4 vs Qwen 3.6 DeepSeek V4 vs Llama 4 Maverick DeepSeek V4 vs GPT-5.3-Codex DeepSeek V4 vs Gemma 4 DeepSeek V4 vs GPT-4o Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Opus 4.5 Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 4 Scout Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen 3.6 Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 4 Maverick Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.3-Codex Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemma 4 Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-4o