← 全部模型

GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6

兩個模型整體表現接近

Arena ELO

GPT-4o

價格較低

Qwen 3.6

速度較快

GPT-4o

詳細比較

類別	GPT-4o	Qwen 3.6
Provider	OpenAI	Alibaba
Context Window	128K	128K
Input Price ($/1M)	$2.5	$0.2 勝出
Output Price ($/1M)	$10	$0.8 勝出
Arena ELO	1285 勝出	N/A
Coding	30.8% SWE-bench	N/A
Reasoning	unknown	N/A
Speed (tokens/sec)	~100 t/s 勝出	N/A
Open Source	No	Yes

常見問題

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Qwen 3.6?

Qwen 3.6 is approximately 92% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4o or Qwen 3.6?

GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3.6 scores N/A.

Which has a larger context window?

GPT-4o supports 128K context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.

Is GPT-4o or Qwen 3.6 open source?

GPT-4o is proprietary. Qwen 3.6 is open source.

相關文章

QwenPaw Rebrands as a Personal AI Assistant

Kimi K2.6 and Qwen 3.6 Narrow the Gap

Qwen3.6-27B opens a smaller, sharper path to coding

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: 35B Open Source Model Release

Unsloth Adds Part-by-Part Qwen3.5 Fine-Tuning

AIME 2026 leaderboard: Qwen leads math tests

更多比較

GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-4o vs GLM-5.2 GPT-4o vs DeepSeek R1 GPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.6 GPT-4o vs DeepSeek V3.2 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 Scout Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen 3.6 vs GLM-5.2 Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek R1 Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek V3.2