Qwen 3 235B vs Qwen 3.6
兩個模型整體表現接近
Arena ELO
Qwen 3 235B
價格較低
Qwen 3.6
速度較快
Qwen 3 235B
詳細比較
| 類別 | Qwen 3 235B | Qwen 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.86 | $0.2 勝出 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $2 | $0.8 勝出 |
| Arena ELO | 1422 勝出 | N/A |
| Coding | 70.7% LiveCodeBench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 2056 CodeForces ELO | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~65 t/s 勝出 | N/A |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
常見問題
Which is cheaper, Qwen 3 235B or Qwen 3.6?
Qwen 3.6 is approximately 65% cheaper than Qwen 3 235B per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Qwen 3 235B or Qwen 3.6?
Qwen 3 235B scores 70.7% LiveCodeBench on coding benchmarks, while Qwen 3.6 scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Qwen 3 235B supports 128K context, while Qwen 3.6 supports 128K.
Is Qwen 3 235B or Qwen 3.6 open source?
Qwen 3 235B is open source. Qwen 3.6 is open source.
相關文章
更多比較
Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3 235B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3 235B vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3 235B vs GPT-4oQwen 3 235B vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3 235B vs Claude Opus 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutQwen 3.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen 3.6 vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3.6 vs GPT-4oQwen 3.6 vs DeepSeek R1Qwen 3.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6