Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4o
GPT-4o leads in 3 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper
GPT-4o
Faster
GPT-4o
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 | $2.5 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 | $10 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1549 WIN | 1340 |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s | ~100 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o is approximately 58% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4o open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. GPT-4o is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher with ELO 1549 vs 1340.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashGPT-4o vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-4o vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o vs Qwen 3.6GPT-4o vs Claude Fable 5GPT-4o vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4 Flash