Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper
Claude Opus 4.6
Faster
Claude Opus 4.6
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 WIN | $10 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 WIN | $30 |
| Arena ELO | 1561 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Claude Opus 4.6 is approximately 25% cheaper than GPT-5.6 Terra per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while GPT-5.6 Terra scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while GPT-5.6 Terra supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. GPT-5.6 Terra is proprietary.
Related Articles
Anthropic is building custom AI chips for Claude
August 2026 model rankings: Claude leads text, Kimi coding
Claude Code Is No Longer the Clear Front-Runner
Anthropic Builds Its Own Chip Team for Claude
Claude 4.5 proves AI progress is still accelerating
Icon’s Claude deal shows clinical trials need AI, not pilots
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.6 vs MiniMax H3Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 MaverickClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-CodexGPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen 3.6GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-5.6 Terra vs MiniMax H3GPT-5.6 Terra vs Llama 4 MaverickGPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5.3-Codex