Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Claude Opus 4.6 leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.6
Cheaper
Claude Opus 4.6
Faster
Claude Opus 4.6
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $5 WIN | N/A |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $25 WIN | N/A |
| Arena ELO | 1549 WIN | N/A |
| Coding | 80.8% SWE-bench | N/A |
| Reasoning | 65.4% Terminal-Bench | N/A |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~40 t/s WIN | N/A |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% SWE-bench on coding benchmarks, while GPT-5.6 Terra scores N/A.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1M context, while GPT-5.6 Terra supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.6 Terra open source?
Claude Opus 4.6 is proprietary. GPT-5.6 Terra is proprietary.
Related Articles
Anthropic’s California deal makes Claude the default public-sector AI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 narrows the SRE gap
GLM 5.2 beats Claude in Semgrep’s IDOR test
Claude Code turns agent setup into terminal work
Anthropic Accuses Alibaba of Massive Claude Distillation
OpenAI narrows GPT-5.6 rollout after U.S. request
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Opus 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Llama 4 ScoutGPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.6 Terra vs GLM-5.2GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen 3.6GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K2.7 Code