Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2
Kimi K2 leads in 3 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Claude Opus 4.7
Cheaper
Kimi K2
Faster
Kimi K2
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Moonshot |
| Context Window | 128K | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | N/A | $0.55 WIN |
| Output Price ($/1M) | N/A | $2.2 WIN |
| Arena ELO | 1567 WIN | 1380 |
| Coding | N/A | 65.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | N/A | 60.2% BrowseComp |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | N/A | ~50 t/s WIN |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or Kimi K2?
Claude Opus 4.7 scores N/A on coding benchmarks, while Kimi K2 scores 65.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 128K context, while Kimi K2 supports 128K.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Kimi K2 open source?
Claude Opus 4.7 is proprietary. Kimi K2 is open source.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Claude Opus 4.7 ranks higher with ELO 1567 vs 1380.
Related Articles
More Comparisons
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 ScoutClaude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen 3.6Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeClaude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashKimi K2 vs Claude Opus 4.5Kimi K2 vs Llama 4 ScoutKimi K2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Kimi K2 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 vs Qwen 3.6Kimi K2 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeKimi K2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash