Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads in 5 of 8 categories
Arena ELO
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Faster
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Context Window | 1M WIN | 128K |
| Input Price ($/1M) | $0.3 WIN | $2.5 |
| Output Price ($/1M) | $2.5 WIN | $10 |
| Arena ELO | 1362 WIN | 1340 |
| Coding | unknown | 30.8% SWE-bench |
| Reasoning | unknown | unknown |
| Speed (tokens/sec) | ~150 t/s WIN | ~100 t/s |
| Open Source | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is approximately 78% cheaper than GPT-4o per million tokens.
Which is better for coding, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores unknown on coding benchmarks, while GPT-4o scores 30.8% SWE-bench.
Which has a larger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M context, while GPT-4o supports 128K.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-4o open source?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is proprietary. GPT-4o is proprietary.
Which ranks higher on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard?
Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher with ELO 1362 vs 1340.
Related Articles
Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform makes agents a cloud servic…
Google’s Android Bench update exposes Gemini’s gap
Gemini in Siri turns memory into a cost line
Google’s Gemini Live camera editing is the right move
Gemini 3.5 Flash lets you script computer use
Xcode 26.6 Adds Gemini to Apple’s AI Coding Stack